search for: comfirm

...nt? OS:AIX4.3.3 SAMBA:2.2.5 configure option:--with-quotas First, I configured AIX's quota environment, and confirmed quota worked fine. And I accessed to SAMBA, but disk size displayed on Windows explorer did not match with quota size. Imformed disk size is filesystem size of SAMBA server. I comfirmed this step on Redhat6.2, but informed disk size was just quota size. I wonder SAMBA quota function does not support AIX. Is that true? Thanks Tsutomu Miyashita

So bath samba 4.7.6 and 4.8.0 hava this problem. Can it be comfirmed to be a bug? If so, it seems to be an important issue that should be resolved as an important function of a DC. Up to now I only have samba 4.5.x that work normal. But 4.5.x won't have new version any more. While I want to keep my samba to be the newest security version. Hope this problem ge...

Hi, Just to comfirm that I have just clean built the current LLVM and VMKIT revisions and it failed too. The problem seems to be the same one (about escape analysis in LLVM). My configuration is Ubuntu 10.04 and GCC 4.4.3 on x86. Cheers, Chanwit Konrad Hinsen-2 wrote: > > On 6 Jul 2010, at 22:25, Zoe Wolk w...

Can someone comfirm my logic here? If I want a phone to use G729.... I can set it to use G729... do I also need to set it in Asterisk? I'm thinking no... as long as asterisk WILL do G729... if that's all the device accepts it should go to that codec, yes?

...e. > > > > Any extra build routine for 9.12 will do things complicated > > without a sensible reason. I prepared a patch and tested it locally. > > It seems it just works fine during provision and as a dns backend. > > > > Patch attached. > > Thanks for comfirming that. That said, I would prefer the extra 9.12 > (identical) .so from the build system just because otherwise I'll spend > my days telling folks it will work when they ask why it loads 9.11 into > 9.12. > > Andrew Bartlett Thanks. I want to notice that, you'll follow th...

...> Hi all, > Yes, there was a change in the LLVM CallInst API, and I haven't updated > vmkit yet. It should be fixed real soon. > Cheers, > Nicolas > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:50 AM, chanwit <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Just to comfirm that I have just clean built the current LLVM and VMKIT >> revisions and it failed too. >> The problem seems to be the same one (about escape analysis in LLVM). >> My configuration is Ubuntu 10.04 and GCC 4.4.3 on x86. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Chanwit >> &...

I am thinking about building a new host and trying to decide if virt-manager is working on CentOS 8. I thought I saw previously on the mail list that there were some issues but cannot find the thread right now. If anyone has migrated some workloads from 7 and seen any issues let me know. Thanks :)

...# rpm -e ocfs-2.4.9-e-1.0.14-1 # rpm -e ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 3.install rpm (V1.0.9-12) # rpm -ivh ocfs-support-1.0.9-12.i686.rpm # rpm -ivh ocfs-2.4.9-e-1.0.9-12.i686.rpm # rpm -ivh ocfs-tools-1.0.9-12.i686.rpm Actually, there was no problem in the behaviour with this procedure. And, I comfirmed this README. (http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/dist/files/README) This readme says "Running a mix of nodes with 1.0.9 or earlier and 1.0.14 is NOT recommended." But, as for the downgrading from 1.0.14-1 to 1.0.9-12, there is no description in this document. Expert, Is there a pro...

...dge. Here is my setup: The bridge computer is installed with Fedore Core 2 (with the SE Linux patch). As I know that kernel 2.6.5 is already support bridging by default, so I didn't recompile the kernel. Then I installed bridge-utils-0.9.6-1.i386. And no additional configuration is made. After comfirming that the 2 ethernet cards for bridging (eth1 & eth2) are working properly, I build up a bridge by the following commands: #ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 promisc #ifconfig eth2 0.0.0.0 promisc #brctl addbr mybridge #brctl addif eth1 #brctl addif eth2 #ifconfig mybridge up Notice that eth1 is connec...

Hi, this is the first time I install linux on a dell server. Simply I booted from a centos 5.5 x64 dvd but I cant see the disks.. is there something I miss ? thanks very much for any help luigi

...39;t updated >> > vmkit yet. It should be fixed real soon. >> > Cheers, >> > Nicolas >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:50 AM, chanwit <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Just to comfirm that I have just clean built the current LLVM and VMKIT >> >> revisions and it failed too. >> >> The problem seems to be the same one (about escape analysis in LLVM). >> >> My configuration is Ubuntu 10.04 and GCC 4.4.3 on x86. >> >> >> >>...

Hi all, Yes, there was a change in the LLVM CallInst API, and I haven't updated vmkit yet. It should be fixed real soon. Cheers, Nicolas On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:50 AM, chanwit <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Just to comfirm that I have just clean built the current LLVM and VMKIT > revisions and it failed too. > The problem seems to be the same one (about escape analysis in LLVM). > My configuration is Ubuntu 10.04 and GCC 4.4.3 on x86. > > Cheers, > > Chanwit > > > Konrad Hinsen-2 wrote:...

....96 >From above,wool's SS is always 450.7 not matter the number and order of factors. The reasion for SS_g1_dat1 NOT equals to SS_g1_dat2: The total SS is constant,so SS for each factor is decreasing with the number of factors increasing. But when I use dataset "warpbreaks" to comfirm, it failed to confirm.The result shows that wool's SS is always 450.7 not matter the number and order of factors. So which reason of the above two is correct then? Many thanks for your help. My best [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...the LLVM CallInst API, and I haven't updated > > vmkit yet. It should be fixed real soon. > > Cheers, > > Nicolas > > > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:50 AM, chanwit <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Just to comfirm that I have just clean built the current LLVM and VMKIT > >> revisions and it failed too. > >> The problem seems to be the same one (about escape analysis in LLVM). > >> My configuration is Ubuntu 10.04 and GCC 4.4.3 on x86. > >> > >> Cheers, > >&g...

...t? (my config for mail location in dovecot.conf is mail_location= maildir:%h/%d/%n) - in docs the maildir specification uses "Maildir" prefix in path ?i must to use always these prefix to set maildir location? - i use procmail, i think that the message are not in HM format, ?could anybody comfirm these? Salu2 ;)

...yet. It should be fixed real soon. >>> > Cheers, >>> > Nicolas >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:50 AM, chanwit <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> Just to comfirm that I have just clean built the current LLVM and >>> >> VMKIT >>> >> revisions and it failed too. >>> >> The problem seems to be the same one (about escape analysis in LLVM). >>> >> My configuration is Ubuntu 10.04 and GCC 4.4.3 on x86. &...

I''m using rails3. It does not seem to check the authenticity_token when doing a POST using Ajax. I traced this to: module ActionDispatch class Request < Rack::Request ..... def forgery_whitelisted? get? || xhr? || content_mime_type.nil? || ! content_mime_type.verify_request? end end so you don''t check if its a get? or a xhr? (ie ajax request). Is this correct? --

> Nobody has looked into it yet. Likely just an extra build rule > required, I would need to see the 9.11 and 9.12 DLZ header files to > check. > > Aaron Haslett (CC'ed) may be able to help once he fights past the other > BIND9 issues he is looking at. > > Andrew Bartlett Thanks for response. I actually looked it myself. Since there is no DLZ ABI changes since

...>>> > Cheers, > >>> > Nicolas > >>> > > >>> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:50 AM, chanwit <chanwit at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> Hi, > >>> >> > >>> >> Just to comfirm that I have just clean built the current LLVM and > >>> >> VMKIT > >>> >> revisions and it failed too. > >>> >> The problem seems to be the same one (about escape analysis in > LLVM). > >>> >> My configuration is Ubuntu 10.0...

Guys, I've heard about some absurd RAM requirements for 9.1, has anybody tested it? e.g. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36314 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-minimal-ram-requirements-tp5771583.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.