search for: colossally

I would like to use R to perform a logistic regression with about 30,000 independent variables. That's right, thirty thousand. Most will be irrelevant: the intent is to use the regression to identify the few that actually matter. Among other things, this calls for giving glm() a colossal "y ~ ..." formula with thirty thousand summed terms on its right hand side. I build up the

I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about that before I reported the bug. That one appeared in gmane, but Evolution never picked it up. And today I've not seen either of my posts but I know it got there because I did see a reply to my post about the flash plugin and it had a snippet of my post

...ith what I know, and if the book is all I know ... well ... > >> A great reason to avoid Asterisk packages and compile from source >> instead. You'll save yourself a lot of headaches. > > That's how I started, by trying to build version 18 from source. It > failed. Colossally. The compile of sources would run for a while, then > the machine would crash spectacularly--I mean, not just hang or > reboot. It actually turned itself off. I tried it several times, and > each time it failed in the same way, but at a different spot in the > compile process. If ev...

...I have, I tend to go with what I know, and if the book is all I know ... well ... > A great reason to avoid Asterisk packages and compile from source > instead. You'll save yourself a lot of headaches. That's how I started, by trying to build version 18 from source. It failed. Colossally. The compile of sources would run for a while, then the machine would crash spectacularly--I mean, not just hang or reboot. It actually turned itself off. I tried it several times, and each time it failed in the same way, but at a different spot in the compile process. If ever I could figure ou...

...terisk at phreaknet.org wrote: > >> >>> A great reason to avoid Asterisk packages and compile from source >>> instead. You'll save yourself a lot of headaches. >> >> That's how I started, by trying to build version 18 from source. It >> failed. Colossally. The compile of sources would run for a while, >> then the machine would crash spectacularly--I mean, not just hang or >> reboot. It actually turned itself off. I tried it several times, and >> each time it failed in the same way, but at a different spot in the >> compil...

Hello I have a time-comsuming program which need to simplify, I have tested the annotated program as follow: > #define function which will be call > calsta <- function(c, n=100000) + { + i <- seq(from=0, length=c) + logx <- lchoose(NT-n, CT-i) + lchoose(n, i) + logmax <- max(logx) + logmax + log(sum(exp(logx - logmax))) + } > CT=6000 #assignment to CT >

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com> wrote: > On 2015-07-28 19:10, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> The trouble is that this is really a property of the bus and not of >> the device. If you build a virtio device that physically plugs into a >> PCIe slot, the device has no concept of an IOMMU in the first place. > > If one would build a

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com> wrote: > On 2015-07-28 19:10, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> The trouble is that this is really a property of the bus and not of >> the device. If you build a virtio device that physically plugs into a >> PCIe slot, the device has no concept of an IOMMU in the first place. > > If one would build a

Hello, Server: Ubuntu Lucid server version Role: Samba file server (I administer it) Authentication: Against a Windows AD (I do not administer it) using winbind. No other authentication scheme is practicable/possible - I do NOT want to manage passwords locally on this machine. LDAP: Not explicitly configured - local policies require a binary *.so file that does not work with Debian based systems

On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:11 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > The new vdpa subsystem with two first drivers. So this one is really annoying to configure. First it asks for vDPA driver for virtio devices (VIRTIO_VDPA) support. If you say 'n', it then asks *again* for VDPA drivers (VDPA_MENU). And then when you say 'n' to *that* it asks you for

...> that before I reported the bug. [snip] > I use gmail and ISTR a discussion recently about some issues with that. That's actually surprising that you've gotten any copies at all. Gmail has never delivered a copy of mail I've sent to a list where I'm a subscriber (which is colossally stupid). So it's totally normal. If you want to be sure a message you've sent was delivered to the list, the surest way is to check the archives. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/ --keith -- kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us

About 8 months ago there was some noise on the mailing list about ESP II protocol for UPStation GXT and similar Liebert models -- someone had at least decoded part of the protocol. Has any work at all been done to facilitate using these units with NUT? I came upon, for free, a GXT 1500 and external battery pack. This unit is colossal: on-line protection and a great runtime to boot. But enough

Ok guys, its official -- wxWindows will become wxWidgets (see below). Curt -----Original Message----- From: Julian Smart [mailto:julian@anthemion.co.uk] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 10:57 AM To: wx-users@lists.wxwindows.org; wx-dev@lists.wxwindows.org; wx-discuss@lists.wxwindows.org Subject: [wx-dev] wxWindows name change Dear wxFolk, As you may be aware, the project is changing its name

Hi, Following an upgrade to 3.0.23, it appears that my UNIX password sync/chat is no longer working (although I can't confirm it wasn't broken in 3.0.21, it was working before). The XP clients throw up a "no permission to change password" error when the users attempt to renew passwords. I've carefully checked my password chat script and it appears to be OK. The logs

Now that many more architectures build vhost, a couple of these (um, and arm with deprecated oabi) have reported build failures with randconfig, however fixes for that need a bit more discussion/testing and will be merged separately. Not a regression - these previously simply didn't have vhost at all. Also, there's some DMA API code in the vdpa simulator is hacky - if no solution surfaces

Now that many more architectures build vhost, a couple of these (um, and arm with deprecated oabi) have reported build failures with randconfig, however fixes for that need a bit more discussion/testing and will be merged separately. Not a regression - these previously simply didn't have vhost at all. Also, there's some DMA API code in the vdpa simulator is hacky - if no solution surfaces

On 29/03/13 18:34, David Chisnall wrote: > handlers, and so on), and a generic structure for the unwind library. > It then passes it to _Unwind_RaiseException(), which is the generic > unwind routine. Excuse me if this sounds silly, but what "library" does the _Unwind_ series of functions come from? Is this a kind of target ABI instrinsic library, or must I link with a

Dear Prof. Ripley, you mention the theory of perceptrons. Could you please point me to an introduction paper or book? Thanks in previous, Dominik > -----Original Message----- > From: ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk [mailto:ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk] > Sent: dimanche, 10. novembre 2002 18:55 > To: Ben Liblit > Cc: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: Re: [R] building a formula for

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com> wrote: > On 2015-07-28 20:22, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com> wrote: >>> On 2015-07-28 19:10, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>> The trouble is that this is really a property of the bus and not of >>>> the device.

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com> wrote: > On 2015-07-28 20:22, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com> wrote: >>> On 2015-07-28 19:10, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>> The trouble is that this is really a property of the bus and not of >>>> the device.