search for: colossal

I would like to use R to perform a logistic regression with about 30,000 independent variables. That's right, thirty thousand. Most will be irrelevant: the intent is to use the regression to identify the few that actually matter. Among other things, this calls for giving glm() a colossal "y ~ ..." formula with thirty thousand summed terms on its right hand side. I build up the formula as a string and then call as.formula() to convert it. Unfortunately, the conversion fails. The parser reports that it has overflowed its stack. :-( Is there any way to pull this off in...

I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about that before I reported the bug. That one appeared in gmane, but Evolution never picked it up. And today I've not seen either of my posts but I know it got there because I did see a reply to my post about the flash plugin and it had a snippet of my post

...ith what I know, and if the book is all I know ... well ... > >> A great reason to avoid Asterisk packages and compile from source >> instead. You'll save yourself a lot of headaches. > > That's how I started, by trying to build version 18 from source. It > failed. Colossally. The compile of sources would run for a while, then > the machine would crash spectacularly--I mean, not just hang or > reboot. It actually turned itself off. I tried it several times, and > each time it failed in the same way, but at a different spot in the > compile process. If...

...I have, I tend to go with what I know, and if the book is all I know ... well ... > A great reason to avoid Asterisk packages and compile from source > instead. You'll save yourself a lot of headaches. That's how I started, by trying to build version 18 from source. It failed. Colossally. The compile of sources would run for a while, then the machine would crash spectacularly--I mean, not just hang or reboot. It actually turned itself off. I tried it several times, and each time it failed in the same way, but at a different spot in the compile process. If ever I could figure...

...terisk at phreaknet.org wrote: > >> >>> A great reason to avoid Asterisk packages and compile from source >>> instead. You'll save yourself a lot of headaches. >> >> That's how I started, by trying to build version 18 from source. It >> failed. Colossally. The compile of sources would run for a while, >> then the machine would crash spectacularly--I mean, not just hang or >> reboot. It actually turned itself off. I tried it several times, and >> each time it failed in the same way, but at a different spot in the >> comp...

Hello I have a time-comsuming program which need to simplify, I have tested the annotated program as follow: > #define function which will be call > calsta <- function(c, n=100000) + { + i <- seq(from=0, length=c) + logx <- lchoose(NT-n, CT-i) + lchoose(n, i) + logmax <- max(logx) + logmax + log(sum(exp(logx - logmax))) + } > CT=6000 #assignment to CT >

...s set up a PCI topology where the devices *aren't* behind the IOMMU or are protected by RMRRs or whatever. Then old kernels would work correctly on new hosts, new kernels would work correctly except on old iommu-providing hosts, and Xen would work. In fact, on Xen, it's impossible without colossal hacks to support non-IOMMU-respecting virtio devices because Xen acts as an intermediate IOMMU between the Linux dom0 guest and the actual host. The QEMU host doesn't even know that Xen is involved. This is why Xen and virtio don't currently work together (without my patches): the device t...

...s set up a PCI topology where the devices *aren't* behind the IOMMU or are protected by RMRRs or whatever. Then old kernels would work correctly on new hosts, new kernels would work correctly except on old iommu-providing hosts, and Xen would work. In fact, on Xen, it's impossible without colossal hacks to support non-IOMMU-respecting virtio devices because Xen acts as an intermediate IOMMU between the Linux dom0 guest and the actual host. The QEMU host doesn't even know that Xen is involved. This is why Xen and virtio don't currently work together (without my patches): the device t...

...t bin daemon nobody named sys tty disk users I want to make certain things happen with this, but being a slight Samba newbie (and generally impatient of anything windows related) I do not know the best way forward (or if what I want is even possible). The situation: Consider sets of people A = a colossal set of about 10000 people, each of which can authenticate against the AD referenced above. B = a set of about 30 people - a subset of A (every member of B is a member of A) C, D, E = smaller sets of about 4-5 people each. The intersection of C, D, E is non-zero. The union of C, D and E is a subset...

...say 'n', it then asks *again* for VDPA drivers (VDPA_MENU). And then when you say 'n' to *that* it asks you for Vhost driver for vDPA-based backend (VHOST_VDPA). This kind of crazy needs to stop. Doing kernel configuration is not supposed to be like some truly horrendously boring Colossal Cave Adventure game where you have to search for a way out of maze of twisty little passages, all alike. Linus

...> that before I reported the bug. [snip] > I use gmail and ISTR a discussion recently about some issues with that. That's actually surprising that you've gotten any copies at all. Gmail has never delivered a copy of mail I've sent to a list where I'm a subscriber (which is colossally stupid). So it's totally normal. If you want to be sure a message you've sent was delivered to the list, the surest way is to check the archives. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/ --keith -- kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us

...e noise on the mailing list about ESP II protocol for UPStation GXT and similar Liebert models -- someone had at least decoded part of the protocol. Has any work at all been done to facilitate using these units with NUT? I came upon, for free, a GXT 1500 and external battery pack. This unit is colossal: on-line protection and a great runtime to boot. But enough bragging about the hardware. I'd like to put it into service, but I don't have a working piece of software to do so. I'm familiar with NUT and use it with an APC unit I have at home. It appears as though the contact closure...

...dows.org; wx-discuss@lists.wxwindows.org Subject: [wx-dev] wxWindows name change Dear wxFolk, As you may be aware, the project is changing its name to avoid conflict with Microsoft. See: http://www.wxwindows.org/name.htm The new name is wxWidgets: the page above explains why it was chosen. A colossal amount of time has now been spent on this issue, so we hope to put this behind us as soon as possible and get back to more interesting work. We would be grateful for any further discussion on this topic to be directed at the new mailing list wx-discuss (see http://www.wxwindows.org/maillst2.htm fo...

Hi, Following an upgrade to 3.0.23, it appears that my UNIX password sync/chat is no longer working (although I can't confirm it wasn't broken in 3.0.21, it was working before). The XP clients throw up a "no permission to change password" error when the users attempt to renew passwords. I've carefully checked my password chat script and it appears to be OK. The logs

Now that many more architectures build vhost, a couple of these (um, and arm with deprecated oabi) have reported build failures with randconfig, however fixes for that need a bit more discussion/testing and will be merged separately. Not a regression - these previously simply didn't have vhost at all. Also, there's some DMA API code in the vdpa simulator is hacky - if no solution surfaces

Now that many more architectures build vhost, a couple of these (um, and arm with deprecated oabi) have reported build failures with randconfig, however fixes for that need a bit more discussion/testing and will be merged separately. Not a regression - these previously simply didn't have vhost at all. Also, there's some DMA API code in the vdpa simulator is hacky - if no solution surfaces

On 29/03/13 18:34, David Chisnall wrote: > handlers, and so on), and a generic structure for the unwind library. > It then passes it to _Unwind_RaiseException(), which is the generic > unwind routine. Excuse me if this sounds silly, but what "library" does the _Unwind_ series of functions come from? Is this a kind of target ABI instrinsic library, or must I link with a

...ogistic regression with about > > 30,000 independent variables. That's right, thirty thousand. Most > > will be irrelevant: the intent is to use the regression to identify > > the few that actually matter. > > > > Among other things, this calls for giving glm() a colossal "y ~ ..." > > formula with thirty thousand summed terms on its right hand side. I > > build up the formula as a string and then call as.formula() > to convert > > it. Unfortunately, the conversion fails. The parser > reports that it > > has overflowed it...

...e configured this for production purposes, only for test > setups (like we, with the knowledge about the limitations). > I'm fine with that. In fact, I proposed these patches before QEMU had this feature in the first place. >> >> In fact, on Xen, it's impossible without colossal hacks to support >> non-IOMMU-respecting virtio devices because Xen acts as an >> intermediate IOMMU between the Linux dom0 guest and the actual host. >> The QEMU host doesn't even know that Xen is involved. This is why Xen >> and virtio don't currently work togethe...

...e configured this for production purposes, only for test > setups (like we, with the knowledge about the limitations). > I'm fine with that. In fact, I proposed these patches before QEMU had this feature in the first place. >> >> In fact, on Xen, it's impossible without colossal hacks to support >> non-IOMMU-respecting virtio devices because Xen acts as an >> intermediate IOMMU between the Linux dom0 guest and the actual host. >> The QEMU host doesn't even know that Xen is involved. This is why Xen >> and virtio don't currently work togethe...