search for: collider

So I have whose autoattendant is colliding with their extensions... Quick fix anyone? Second someone presses say a person's extension (101) ... Autoattendant sends them to the first context... [companyx-main-aa] exten => s,1,Background(companyx/companyx-main) exten => s,2,Background(silence/10) exten => s,3,Background(companyx/companyx-main) exten => s,4,Background(silence/10)

Hi, I think I should rename the constants to be a little less likely to collide. I think just upcasing them might be good enough? - Daniel On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Venkatraman, > >>  The current version in SVN fails to compile in sparc machines since >> gcc defines "sparc" as a macro in sparc machines that

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3988 Summary: -a collides with --flags Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: rsync@oldach.net QAContact:

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Lawrence <lawrence at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi, All: > > > > I am trying to extend EarlyCSE.cpp to do more commoning of GEP instruction, > it requires a hashtable with two keys, I defined > > > > typedef ScopedHashTable<DoubleKey, std::pair<Value *, unsigned>, > > DenseMapInfo<Value

Charles, We did notice that there were two categories. Is there a way if we could determine if it is colliding? We do have a USB analyzer so I'll see if that can be used to determine if the UPS is disconnecting due to inactivity on the bus. Thanks! Shade On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 18, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Shade Alabsa

Instead of just upcasing them, can we add prefix ARCH_? --Venkatraman On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Eric Christopher<echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I think I should rename the constants to be a little less likely to >> collide. I think just upcasing them might be good enough? > >

Hi, All: I am trying to extend EarlyCSE.cpp to do more commoning of GEP instruction, it requires a hashtable with two keys, I defined typedef ScopedHashTable<DoubleKey, std::pair<Value *, unsigned>, DenseMapInfo<Value *>, LoadMapAllocator> LoadHTType; I declared a DoubleKey struct similar to CallValue but with two Value * member, However I

Hi everyone, Not sure if you've read http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/SoftIntCodeSign/ . should some kind of advisory be sent to advise people not to rely solely on MD5 checksums? Maybe an update to the man page is due ? : " MD5 has not yet (2001-09-03) been broken, but sufficient attacks have been made that its security is in some doubt. The attacks on MD5 are in the

> On 21 Mar 2019, at 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:07:57PM +0200, Liran Alon wrote: >>>>>> 2) It brings non-intuitive customer experience. For example, a customer may attempt to analyse connectivity issue by checking the connectivity >>>>>> on a net-failover slave (e.g. the VF) but will see no

> On 21 Mar 2019, at 14:37, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:07:57PM +0200, Liran Alon wrote: >>>>>> 2) It brings non-intuitive customer experience. For example, a customer may attempt to analyse connectivity issue by checking the connectivity >>>>>> on a net-failover slave (e.g. the VF) but will see no

All, I have a little namespace collision here. I am trying to use both RubyfulSoup (an HTML parser - which I highly recommend by the way) and the ActionView::Helpers::TextHelper class. Within the TextHelper class, there''s an attempt to create a new "Tag" object. However, Tag is also defined in the RubyfulSoup gem and it is _this_ Tag class whose initialize method is

I would prefer not to; they already live in a protected namespace, so there is no need to mangle them except to protect them from exuberant preprocessor defines, and this would be slightly out of style with other public uses of enumerations in LLVM. - Daniel On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Venkatraman Govindaraju<venkatra at cs.wisc.edu> wrote: > Instead of just upcasing them, can we

On Nov 18, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Shade Alabsa <shade34321 at gmail.com> wrote: > I then noticed that in ups.conf I did not set the pollinterval, we normally set it to 15, so I set it to test on a RHEL 6.6 machine which caused this issue to happen again. On our own custom system we took the poll interval out and prelim testing doesn't showing the repeated disconnects/reconnects. I started

On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Building on 64 bit Cygwin works out of the box. However, I have trouble > with the testsuite. As usual, I'm building outside the source tree: > > - Building the testsuite fails: > > Assembler messages: > Fatal error: can't create regress/unittests/bitmap/tests.o: No such file or directory > Makefile:152:

> On 21 Mar 2019, at 10:58, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:19:22AM +0200, Liran Alon wrote: >> >> >>> On 21 Mar 2019, at 0:10, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:43:41PM +0200, Liran Alon wrote: >>>> >>>>

> On 21 Mar 2019, at 10:58, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:19:22AM +0200, Liran Alon wrote: >> >> >>> On 21 Mar 2019, at 0:10, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:43:41PM +0200, Liran Alon wrote: >>>> >>>>

Looking at the MSI implementation I have a couple of questions: 1) There currently seems to be a hidden requirement of NR_PIRQS in the kernel needing to be no smaller than NR_IRQS in the hypervisor. Otherwise, the pirq returned from PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq may collide with the dynamic IRQs in the kernel or even be out of range altogether. Therefore I think that NR_PIRQS has to become a variable

[ add Ira ] On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 5:27 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> wrote: > > The code hasn't been used since it was added to the tree, and doesn't > appear to actually be usable. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com>

Is it possible for the uid/gid numbers that are generated by the idmap_rid and idmap_hash to collide if there are a large number of users or groups? I cannot seem to find any documentation on the limitations of these plugins. Before using I want to make absolutely sure that there won't be any collisions. In doing some research about Likewise Open, I see it's hashing routine can have

Hi, I''ve been using rails 3 engines and (at least in my experience) the engine''s application controller is overidden by the app''s application controller. Wouldn''t it be better if the app would just load on top of the engine? I mean that if an engine''s application controller has methods or anything else that does not collide with the stuff defined