search for: collide

So I have whose autoattendant is colliding with their extensions... Quick fix anyone? Second someone presses say a person's extension (101) ... Autoattendant sends them to the first context... [companyx-main-aa] exten => s,1,Background(companyx/companyx-main) exten => s,2,Background(silence/10) exten => s,3,Background(companyx/companyx-main) exten => s,4,Background(silence/10)

Hi, I think I should rename the constants to be a little less likely to collide. I think just upcasing them might be good enough? - Daniel On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Duncan Sands<baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Venkatraman, > >>  The current version in SVN fails to compile in sparc machines since >> gcc defines "sparc" as a macro in...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3988 Summary: -a collides with --flags Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: rsync@oldach.net...

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Lawrence <lawrence at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi, All: > > > > I am trying to extend EarlyCSE.cpp to do more commoning of GEP instruction, > it requires a hashtable with two keys, I defined > > > > typedef ScopedHashTable<DoubleKey, std::pair<Value *, unsigned>, > > DenseMapInfo<Value

Charles, We did notice that there were two categories. Is there a way if we could determine if it is colliding? We do have a USB analyzer so I'll see if that can be used to determine if the UPS is disconnecting due to inactivity on the bus. Thanks! Shade On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 18, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Shade Alabsa

...an we add prefix ARCH_? --Venkatraman On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Eric Christopher<echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I think I should rename the constants to be a little less likely to >> collide. I think just upcasing them might be good enough? > > It should, this is the pattern generally emitted by all of the backends. > >>>> >>>>  $ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep sparc >>>>  #define sparc 1 >>>>  #define __sparc__ 1 >>>>  #de...

Hi, All: I am trying to extend EarlyCSE.cpp to do more commoning of GEP instruction, it requires a hashtable with two keys, I defined typedef ScopedHashTable<DoubleKey, std::pair<Value *, unsigned>, DenseMapInfo<Value *>, LoadMapAllocator> LoadHTType; I declared a DoubleKey struct similar to CallValue but with two Value * member, However I

Hi everyone, Not sure if you've read http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/SoftIntCodeSign/ . should some kind of advisory be sent to advise people not to rely solely on MD5 checksums? Maybe an update to the man page is due ? : " MD5 has not yet (2001-09-03) been broken, but sufficient attacks have been made that its security is in some doubt. The attacks on MD5 are in the

...ces >>>>> created by users? >>>> >>>> This is kinda controversial, but maybe separate netns names into 2 groups: hidden and normal. >>>> To reference a hidden netns, you need to do it explicitly. >>>> Hidden and normal netns names can collide as they will be maintained in different namespaces (Yes I?m overloading the term namespace here?). >>> >>> Maybe it's an unnamed namespace. Hidden until userspace gives it a name? >> >> This is also a good idea that will solve the issue. Yes. >> >>&g...

...ces >>>>> created by users? >>>> >>>> This is kinda controversial, but maybe separate netns names into 2 groups: hidden and normal. >>>> To reference a hidden netns, you need to do it explicitly. >>>> Hidden and normal netns names can collide as they will be maintained in different namespaces (Yes I?m overloading the term namespace here?). >>> >>> Maybe it's an unnamed namespace. Hidden until userspace gives it a name? >> >> This is also a good idea that will solve the issue. Yes. >> >>&g...

All, I have a little namespace collision here. I am trying to use both RubyfulSoup (an HTML parser - which I highly recommend by the way) and the ActionView::Helpers::TextHelper class. Within the TextHelper class, there''s an attempt to create a new "Tag" object. However, Tag is also defined in the RubyfulSoup gem and it is _this_ Tag class whose initialize method is

...n > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Eric Christopher<echristo at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Aug 25, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think I should rename the constants to be a little less likely to >>> collide. I think just upcasing them might be good enough? >> >> It should, this is the pattern generally emitted by all of the backends. >> >>>>> >>>>>  $ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep sparc >>>>>  #define sparc 1 >>>>>  #define __spa...

On Nov 18, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Shade Alabsa <shade34321 at gmail.com> wrote: > I then noticed that in ups.conf I did not set the pollinterval, we normally set it to 15, so I set it to test on a RHEL 6.6 machine which caused this issue to happen again. On our own custom system we took the poll interval out and prelim testing doesn't showing the repeated disconnects/reconnects. I started

On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Building on 64 bit Cygwin works out of the box. However, I have trouble > with the testsuite. As usual, I'm building outside the source tree: > > - Building the testsuite fails: > > Assembler messages: > Fatal error: can't create regress/unittests/bitmap/tests.o: No such file or directory > Makefile:152:

...how do we avoid conflicting with namespaces >>> created by users? >> >> This is kinda controversial, but maybe separate netns names into 2 groups: hidden and normal. >> To reference a hidden netns, you need to do it explicitly. >> Hidden and normal netns names can collide as they will be maintained in different namespaces (Yes I?m overloading the term namespace here?). > > Maybe it's an unnamed namespace. Hidden until userspace gives it a name? This is also a good idea that will solve the issue. Yes. > >> Does this seems reasonable? >>...

...how do we avoid conflicting with namespaces >>> created by users? >> >> This is kinda controversial, but maybe separate netns names into 2 groups: hidden and normal. >> To reference a hidden netns, you need to do it explicitly. >> Hidden and normal netns names can collide as they will be maintained in different namespaces (Yes I?m overloading the term namespace here?). > > Maybe it's an unnamed namespace. Hidden until userspace gives it a name? This is also a good idea that will solve the issue. Yes. > >> Does this seems reasonable? >>...

Looking at the MSI implementation I have a couple of questions: 1) There currently seems to be a hidden requirement of NR_PIRQS in the kernel needing to be no smaller than NR_IRQS in the hypervisor. Otherwise, the pirq returned from PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq may collide with the dynamic IRQs in the kernel or even be out of range altogether. Therefore I think that NR_PIRQS has to become a variable defaulting to 256 but getting initialized from a hypervisor reported value (perhaps in start_info, or else from a new (sub-)hypercall). 2) While pci_restore_msi_state()...

...u_lock, > - flags); > - locked_pgdat = NULL; > - } > - put_devmap_managed_page(page); > - continue; > - } > - This collides with Ira's bug fix [1]. The MEMORY_DEVICE_FSDAX case needs this to be converted to be independent of "public" pages. Perhaps it should be pulled out of -mm and incorporated in this series. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190605214922.17684-1-ira.weiny at intel.com/

Is it possible for the uid/gid numbers that are generated by the idmap_rid and idmap_hash to collide if there are a large number of users or groups? I cannot seem to find any documentation on the limitations of these plugins. Before using I want to make absolutely sure that there won't be any collisions. In doing some research about Likewise Open, I see it's hashing routine can have thi...

...experience) the engine''s application controller is overidden by the app''s application controller. Wouldn''t it be better if the app would just load on top of the engine? I mean that if an engine''s application controller has methods or anything else that does not collide with the stuff defined with the app, couldn''t it be used? Isn''t this the default behaviour of ruby, that you can just reopen a class and add methods to it possibly overriding them but not deleting the rest of the class? Regards, Luís Ferreira -- You received this message be...