search for: cogburn

Reid Spencer wrote: > Its certainly possible to generate .ll files but its probably about the > same amount of work to use the LLVM API and there are significant speed > and validity benefits to doing so. Does this mean that LLVM is moving away from the idea of a truly abstract IR language, to being a set of development libraries for use by build-time-dependent frontends?

Misha Brukman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:11:22PM -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote: >> Reid Spencer wrote: >> > Its certainly possible to generate .ll files but its probably about >> > the same amount of work to use the LLVM API and there are >> > significant speed and validity benefits to doing so. >> >> Does this mean that LLV...

On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:11:22PM -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote: > Reid Spencer wrote: > > Its certainly possible to generate .ll files but its probably about > > the same amount of work to use the LLVM API and there are > > significant speed and validity benefits to doing so. > > Does this mean that LLVM is moving away from th...

On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 01:17 -0400, Ed Cogburn wrote: > One of LLVM's powerful (IMHO) selling points was the > concept of a *complete*, abstract IR language which any independent > frontend could write to (sending llvm-as unoptimized, even ugly, but > correct, IR assembly that gets converted to optimized native code), without &g...

Hi everyone, On Sunday 12 September 2004 08:03 pm, Chris Lattner wrote: > > I think that all of the major platforms should be natively supported by > lib/System. They would, through the APR. Its not a major issue to me (and I'm a nobody here anyway), but I don't understand why you would insist on this software independence *now*, when LLVM is at a very early, and still

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> As you mention above, you should use malloc and cast the return value. >>> If you want to get the desired size in a target-independent way (always >>> good), you should do something like this: > > ... > >> Chris you should maybe add this example to the getelementptr >>

Reid Spencer wrote: > Yes, that's right! > > In fact, shortly the process of doing that will get easier with the > llvmc (compiler driver) tool that I'm working on. [another newbie delurks] Hi, Reid. Been tinkering with LLVM about 2 weeks now. I've been using the Stacker Compiler as an example so far for my own little project. Is this tool you mentioned coming