search for: coexisting

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: - Cannot boot Windows 2000 - Only one CPU is detected in SMP dom0 - Destroying VMX with 4G memory may make xend hang on IA-32e IA-32: + Build&Boot UP xen0 without problem + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX domain + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 WindowsXP SP1/SP2

We have tested latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset.Here is the test summary. issues: - No bocking issues. IA-32: Build&Boot SMP xen0 without problem Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX domain Can bootup unmodified IA-32 WindowsXP SP1/SP2 in VMX domain Can bootup VMX & XenU with different memory size(VMX:128MB,256MB,512MB.XenU:256MB)

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: - Cannot boot Windows 2000 - Only one CPU is detected in SMP dom0 - Destroying VMX with 4G memory may make xend hang on IA-32e IA-32: + Build&Boot UP xen0 without problem + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX domain + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 WindowsXP SP1/SP2 in

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: - Only one CPU is detected in SMP dom0 - Destroying VMX with 4G memory may make xend hang on IA-32e IA-32: + Build&Boot UP xen0 without problem + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX domain + Can bootup unmodified IA-32 WindowsXP SP1/SP2 in VMX domain + Can bootup

Hi everyone ! This is probably a silly question -but I'll go ahead and ask anyway- .Can R and S+2000 coexist on the same system (ie are there any potential conflicts between the two applications?).I have a Windows 2000 and a windows NT system. Many thanks ! Charis Tzagarakis. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11651 Bug ID: 11651 Summary: Can we allow --inplace and --sparse to coexist when --whole-file is in play? Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

We have tested latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset.Here is the test summary. Issues: - IA-32 VMX guest will hang when booting on IA-32PAE host with acpi=1 and apic=1.(Bug 594) - Failed to created VMX after tens of VMXs have been created & destroyed on IA-32e.(Bug593) IA-32: Build&Boot SMP xen0 without problem Can bootup unmodified IA-32 2.4/2.6 linux in VMX

I have an existing install of Samba4 ( I think beta6 vintage ), which uses ntvfs and bind9. It's only providing AD and Group Policy. I have a seperate file server running 3.6.x. I want to add a server to the domain running the most recent RC. I know they are using internal by default and s3fs for the file shares on sysvol. Can s3fs coexist with ntvfs? Can the internal DNS coexist with

Hi, Let's say an interface ethX exists. I created vlan on ethX on hypervisor - ethX.h. I also created vlan on same ethX inside VM - exthX.v. Can both ethX.h and ethX.v coexist? - Meaning can both of these interfaces pingable at same time? Thanks, Sucheta. ________________________________ This message and any attached documents contain information from QLogic Corporation or its

Hi, Let's say an interface ethX exists. I created vlan on ethX on hypervisor - ethX.h. I also created vlan on same ethX inside VM - exthX.v. Can both ethX.h and ethX.v coexist? - Meaning can both of these interfaces pingable at same time? Thanks, Sucheta. ________________________________ This message and any attached documents contain information from QLogic Corporation or its

Hi all, We have tested IPF/Xen on 3.0.3rc1. The testing mainly focus on the VTI domains. It includes guest booting, memory size, vcpu number, guest installation, SMP guest, guest coexist, xm command, Xwindows and Windows 2k3. The testing results are good. There are only 6 issues found. All of them are not new. 1. VTI domain and XenU domain might meet “Can not allocate memory”. This is bug.

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Here is the test summary: Issues: - Cannot boot Four VMX at same time on IA32 host - Cannot boot Windows XP SP1/SP2 on IA32e host - Create IA32-PAE VMX on IA32e host will make VMX kernel panic - Create IA32 VMX on IA32e host will make VMX hang - Destroying VMX with 4G memory may make xend hang on IA-32e IA-32: -

Is it still considered best practice to uninstall sssd to ensure there are no conflicts with winbind? I ask because Red Hat is installing sssd by default even on a minimal install of RHEL 8.8 (may apply to earlier releases of RHEL 8). This caught me off guard as MINIMAL is supposed to mean something... ::sigh:: I only discovered this by accident when checking to ensure the /etc/nsswitch.conf

I am running Dovecot 1.2.16 and considering moving up to 2.0.8. I have found <http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0> but there's not a lot about deploying a 2.0 server alongside an existing 1.2. Any hints on a seamless approach to this, especially one that might allow me to upgrade individual users in place, without moving their maildirs into a new tree and still avoid issues with

Hi, currently I got the following problem: The system contains a HFC-PCI card, it's running without problems under zaphfc. Now this system also should send/receive faxes. Receiving faxes works with rxfax (spandsp) but txfax is not comfortable enough and doesnt bring the demanded results. So an older external ISDN modem and mgetty-sendfax is used for sending faxes. I'd like to send the

Hi, in my local network i have two samba server (2.2.8a) : [samba-2.2.8a-ldap PDC and OpenLDAP server]-> contains scripts,policies [samba-2.2.8a-ldap File server] -> contains data (160GB) Recently i upgrade PDC to samba 3.0.12 and OpenLDAP server(2.2.23). The PDC works correctly but when the scripts mount a share from samba FS not works because still using old ldap attributes. I'm

Hello, thanks for the time to read this. I am doing a proof of concept in the following context. I have a NT 4.0 domain and because I don't want AD, I am moving towards a MIT Kerberos managed domain which still gives me SSO and thru kerberized SAMBA, file sharing. What I have setup so far is XP workstations SSO into the MIT Kerberos domain, I can access shares on the Samba server

Railsters: I just installed fixture_scenarios ... http://fixture-scenarios.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/fixture_scenarios ...into a project with some RSpec specifications. They all went kablooey. I didn''t even create a scenario; the system just started calling its version of fixtures(). The normal tests pass and the RSpec ones unanimously emit: TypeError in ''Context (verbose

We have tested Xen for 3.0.3rc1. The test includes Guest installation, device model, control panel, guest os and basic function tests. Here are issues found in our tests, For the first 6 issues, I think it''s better to be fixed in 3.0.3: 1. Para-virtualization driver doen''t work for HVM guests The hvm guest always hanged or met kernel panic when trying to load xenbus.ko. So vbd

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (3): ================================================= 1).time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://losvmm-bridge.sh.intel.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 You can reproduce it on SMP windows, it will not happen on UP Windows 2) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network