search for: coddl

Monolithic is trying to solve the wrong problem - it's that simple. Any discussion or attempt to coddle those who think it's necessary is a waste of time. #dictator As part of any potential migration, everyone involved must start to accept certain changes, (large or small) to the workflow. The big challenge here isn't technical, it's mindset. It's convincing any group of people who...

...Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Jonathan Roelofs via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 7/21/16 11:03 AM, C Bergström via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> Monolithic is trying to solve the wrong problem - it's that simple. >> Any discussion or attempt to coddle those who think it's necessary is >> a waste of time. #dictator > > > Christopher, > > AFAICT, you haven't explained *why* it is the wrong problem. Mind > elaborating on that? > > > Jon > > p.s: edicts, appeals to authority, and ad hominems are not us...

...space policies are routinely being weaponized to censor and punish even rather ordinary speech. (I am not politically aligned with the following website, but I'm very much in sync with this article, which enumerates several such excesses: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/ ) In any case, I suspect that I am by now probably belaboring the point. But I appreciate having had the opportunity to present my concerns. Regards, Bill

...v >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 7/21/16 11:03 AM, C Bergström via llvm-dev wrote: >>>> >>>> Monolithic is trying to solve the wrong problem - it's that simple. >>>> Any discussion or attempt to coddle those who think it's necessary is >>>> a waste of time. #dictator >>> >>> >>> Christopher, >>> >>> AFAICT, you haven't explained *why* it is the wrong problem. Mind >>> elaborating on that? >>> >>> &gt...

...ource file requires but doesn't find, not least because there is no `R RHOME`/include. I thus went looking for said Rmath.h and found one to be at: /usr/share/R/include/Rmath.h and so tried to get the cudaBayesreg installer to take notice of that location. I tried a number of approaches to coddling the underlying configure without much success. The small success I did have though then showed up that even though I had an Rmath.h, I didn't have any Rmath libraries, because, it turns out, they are in a seperate package. However, on installing Ubuntu's r-mathlib package, I find that...

One other point about maintaining branches: With the single repository approach, maintaining a long-running branch that touches multiple subprojects (e.g. llvm and clang) becomes *far* simpler. With the umbrella repo, you have to do the submodules trickery I described in the original e-mail. It is complicated, and takes a lot of typing (or requires you to develop custom scripts). But with the

I just did an install of CentOS 5 on one of my machines. However, when I try to use the 'service' command (such as 'service httpd start') I get an error that the service command is not found. Why would that be? Where does this command come from? I can launch the services just fine using the respective /etc/init.d/ entries. -- Cheers, Trey ---- Dieters live life in the

Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev wrote: > However, it is incredibly > important to not expect or demand that a person *you have made feel > unsafe* take the time to explain why. I feel what you have written here to be offensive to the highest degree, and your words make me feel unsafe when contemplating their effect on my prospects for future interaction with this community.

Hi , I'm disperated I've recently installed FreeBSD 4.8 ,and all at the first look was ok , this was only a try in a small partition , and now I have decided to install it in a bigger partition , so I've downloaded the 5.1 ISO (to give it a try too) and I've tried to BURN it with "burncd" . Now, I've noticed that in the DEV directory there are the devices

Hey all, I am in the middle of creating a new user wizard which will generate all the .conf's the new Asterisk user will require to get themselves up and running in Asterisk without having to touch a single configuration file. This is what I have come up with as a rough draft. It is far from complete, so I'm asking people to submit things that should be added, changed, removed

On 07/29/2015 07:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > >> Security is *always* opposed to convenience. > False. OS X by default runs only signed binaries, and if they come > from the App Store they run in a sandbox. User gains significant > security with this, and are completely unaware of it. There is

...y if profanity was an issue in the workplace, for a large development community, that LKML would have run afoul a long time ago. My view - I'm only replying because the reality is that in the workplace sometimes a full lexicon of words are spoken. I really don't like being censored just to coddle overly sensitive people. Context... This big discussion is started, but how will it conclude - would someone just take action. I don't like Chanlder's wall of text, because it doesn't seem simple enough - should I draft up an alternative for review? I'd highly favor common sense...

Greetings list, Hoping someone might have experience with poorly-performing net connections and which devices work best over them. One of our clients has a number of employees that work from home, and are given a SIP phone to take with them and hook up to their broadband. For the most part, this works fine, but there are an increasing number where sound quality is poor ("chops" in and

On 5 May 2016 at 13:23, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > Is the list PG, PG-13, R or at what level do "we" adults all consider > "ok". Even on broadcast tv (in the US) you'll hear some profanity. > (context) > https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/obscene-indecent-and-profane-broadcasts Excellent context! > Some people have pointed

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Dec 29, 2014, at 10:07 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > >> it's not necessary for either code interfaces or data structures >> to change in backward-incompatible ways. > > You keep talking about the cost of coping with change, but apparently you believe