search for: cmalke

.... 2. I don't want to have the huge effort right now, to port a library that was mainly developed by and on x86_64 *just because* I want compiler-rt to work on ARM. This can work in several ways: A. I compile the whole lot, but only grab the compiler-rt library when packaging. B. I change the CMalke files to only compiler RT on ARM, or any other architecture that wants only RT C. We split the libraries If the consensus is that the sanitizers are a lot bigger than RT and should split for that reason, I'm fine with it. If not, I'm also fine with having a CMake configuration to only buil...

...t right now, to port a library that was mainly developed by and on x86_64 *just because* I want compiler-rt to work on ARM. >> >> This can work in several ways: >> >> A. I compile the whole lot, but only grab the compiler-rt library when packaging. >> B. I change the CMalke files to only compiler RT on ARM, or any other architecture that wants only RT >> C. We split the libraries >> >> If the consensus is that the sanitizers are a lot bigger than RT and should split for that reason, I'm fine with it. If not, I'm also fine with having a CMake...

Hi all, Can anyone explain me what was the rationale behind putting the sanitizer libraries in compiler-rt? The sanitizers only work properly in x86_64 and I don't see anyone even testing to any other platform, while compiler-rt should be a substitute for libgcc on all platforms, at least that's the goal, and linking the success of the RT library to the success of the sanitizers is a bit