Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "clusterdev01".
2019 Nov 29
2
Re: What's the best way to make use of VLAN interfaces with VMs?
...w interface.
>>
>> This would seem to be a common situation. What is the best way to
>> work around this?
>>
>> Both the host bridge and the host VLAN interface already have their
>> assigned IP addresses and appear like this in libvirt:
>>
>> [root@clusterdev01 ]# ifconfig
>> br1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>> inet 192.168.0.110 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
>> 192.168.0.255
>> inet6 fe80::1e98:ecff:fe1b:276d prefixlen 64 scopeid
>> 0x20<link>
>> e...
2019 Dec 03
1
Re: What's the best way to make use of VLAN interfaces with VMs?
...bytes 173404 (169.3 KiB)
> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
> TX packets 112 bytes 9490 (9.2 KiB)
> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>
> // ping to another host with the same bridge br1 defined on 192.168.0.120
> [root@clusterdev01 ~]# ping 192.168.0.120
> PING 192.168.0.120 (192.168.0.120) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.120: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.481 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.120: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.244 ms
> 64 bytes from 192.168.0.120: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.242 ms
> 64 bytes fr...
2019 Dec 03
0
Re: What's the best way to make use of VLAN interfaces with VMs?
... RX packets 3429 bytes 173404 (169.3 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 112 bytes 9490 (9.2 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
// ping to another host with the same bridge br1 defined on 192.168.0.120
[root@clusterdev01 ~]# ping 192.168.0.120
PING 192.168.0.120 (192.168.0.120) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.120: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.481 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.120: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.244 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.120: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.242 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.120: icmp_se...
2019 Nov 27
2
What's the best way to make use of VLAN interfaces with VMs?
...me. So I started to look for ways to allow
my VMs to bind to this new interface.
This would seem to be a common situation. What is the best way to work
around this?
Both the host bridge and the host VLAN interface already have their
assigned IP addresses and appear like this in libvirt:
[root@clusterdev01 ]# ifconfig
br1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.0.110 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255
inet6 fe80::1e98:ecff:fe1b:276d prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 1c:98:ec:1b:27:6d txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
...
2019 Nov 27
0
Re: What's the best way to make use of VLAN interfaces with VMs?
...gt; my VMs to bind to this new interface.
>
> This would seem to be a common situation. What is the best way to work
> around this?
>
> Both the host bridge and the host VLAN interface already have their
> assigned IP addresses and appear like this in libvirt:
>
> [root@clusterdev01 ]# ifconfig
> br1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 192.168.0.110 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255
> inet6 fe80::1e98:ecff:fe1b:276d prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
> ether 1c:98:ec:1b:27:6d txqueuelen 1...