Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "clomp".
Did you mean:
clamp
2014 Jul 23
2
[LLVMdev] Adding custom #pragma for clang
I'd like to add a custom #pragma directive in clang for research purposes.
I'm familiar with the LLVM pass-writing interface but new to the rest of
LLVM and clang. I've looked into Simone Pellegrini's work on a #pragma
interface (https://github.com/motonacciu/clomp and
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2013-04/pellegrini-slides.pdf), but I'm in no
position to determine if this approach is applicable for the latest version
of clang, or how to go about updating things. Any advice would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks,
David
-------------- next part --------------
An...
2012 Jun 18
1
[LLVMdev] Any Work Done/ Going on for OpenMP Support in Clang?
Hello;
I saw a discussion went i the llvm mailing list about work on supporting
OpenMP in Clang (llvm-gcc already supports that).(
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-January/046640.html)
I just want to know, anybody has made any progress in it? It would be
really helpful for me.
Thanks a lot;
--
Arnamoy Bhattacharyya
Athabasca Hall 143
Department of Computing Science -
2011 Sep 08
0
Consistently printing the name of an object passed to a function; & a data-auditing question
...ength: ", length(objectX), "\n")}
invisible(object.name)}
This works well when I give it the name of a single object. My problem is
when I try to produce descriptions of a bunch of variables in a row, such as
the variables in a list of variables, or all the variables that I have
clomped together in a data frame. The output is all side effects. Some ways
of passing multiple variables get the name wrong, but the rest right. For
example, if I have a list of variables, and do:
> lapply(varList, testX)
I get an output like this:
##################################
testX( X[[1L]...