search for: cleav

hello every one, How to function more than one loop in R? I have the following problem to be solved with the a method of three loops, can you help me please? The data is attached with this message. The data is composed of two parts, cleaved (denoted by ?cleaved?) and non cleaved (denoted by ?noncleaved?). ? to access to the ith peptide, you can use X$Peptide[i] ? to access to the ith label, you can use X$Label[i] define a set of amino acids using string or other format if you want amino.acid<-"ACDEFGHIKLMNPQRSTVWY" d...

...ries <- getSymbols(tckr, from="2000-01-01", to="2013-01-01",auto.assign=FALSE) I'm too much of a newbie to suggest how to fix this (or what else it might be) so I thought I'd report it to the list and see what happens. If any of this code doesn't work (I've cleaved it out of a bigger project) just let me know and I'll fill in any missing pieces. Regards, Bit Rocker [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...www.voip-info.org :( . I know conference bridging is standard (as long as you have a Zaptel driver loaded). Is it the standard work around to transfer calls into a MeetMe extension and then join the conference, thereby effectively creating a 3-way call but a little more onerously? Thanks, Geoff Cleaves Barcelona

I haven't gotten anything from the list since my email of 09:34 EST. Do I have a problem, or is the list quiet? Please cc me offlist, if this goes through. mark

...eason to chunk the data I can think of is bitrate peeling: chunking means that entire chunks/packets can be skipped to drop channels. But this clearly isn't the best way to go about peeling because, as I said, audio channels tend to be tightly coupled. We don't go from stereo to mono by cleaving off the right or left channel, but by summing, and if we simply drop a surround channel, we'll also break any multichannel panning law. Thus if we want to enable peeling, we have to use things akin to mid/side coding (like the UHJ hierarchy) or joint progressive coding over the entire se...

I made a few updates to OggPCM2 http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggPCM2 reflecting the latest discussions. Could everyone have a look at it and see if they agree. Otherwise, what do you feel should be changed? Anyone wants to speak in support of chunked PCM? For all those that are just tired of this mess like me, please express yourself in the new spec I created: OggPCM3

On May 1, 2015, at 12:31 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > Proposal > Re-architect the linker based on the section model where it’s appropriate. > Stop simulating different linker semantics using the Unix model. Instead, directly implement the native behavior. Preface: I have never personally contributed code to LLD, so don’t take anything I’m about to say too seriously.

I have one module, kibana, that defines a file snippet for the apache module to fulfill (e.g., /etc/https/conf.d/kibana.conf). The apache::params class defines a variable of the path of where this snippet should be placed, $config_d. The snippet uses this variable in its definition. However, it seems that the snippet never resolves the $apache::params::config_d variable, and I''m

Hi guys, After working for a long period of time on LLD, I think I found a few things that we should improve in the LLD design for both development ease and runtime performance. I would like to get feedback on this proposal. Thanks! *Problems with the current LLD architecture *The current LLD architecture has, in my opinion, two issues. *The atom model is not the best model for some architectures