search for: cipe

Hi, during the past weeks i tried to set up a network through a cipe tunnel, building a vpn to some road warriers. With few words, the tunnel is etablished, and at the tcp/ip level everything works fine. NET A : 192.168.0.0/26 NET B : 192.168.102.0/26 trans-net : 192.168.101.0/26 in ascii-art, it looks like this: eth0:192.168.0.5 +-----------+ cipcb0:192.1...

Hello everyone, Last week the CVS version of tinc gained the ability to run under Windows, in a Cygwin environment (http://www.cygwin.com), making use of the virtual network driver from the CIPE project (http://cipe-win32.sourceforge.net/). Preparations were also being made to support Windows without Cygwin. Today James Yonan of OpenVPN (http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/) anounced a port of OpenVPN to Windows without needing a Cygwin environment, using a virtual network driver also derived...

Hi - I''ve been looking around for simple answers to this for a while now, but haven''t been able to find any HOW-TO type documentation. I am administering a site with a remote location connected primarily via a cipe tunnel over a SHDSL connection. We also have a direct PSTN connection between the sites. Seeing as phone calls here are not timed I plan to keep the PSTN connection alive even when the cipe tunel is active. I am looking for information as to the best way to set up this network, so that if the cipe...

Hello, I have running tinc on my several linux boxes and now I am trying to install tinc on my WinXP box. I can't understand what kind of VPN interface I should install - CIPE or TAP which included into the windows tinc package ? Another question is about variable "Interface =" in the tinc.conf file. What name should I use ? Regards, Igor Belokopytov Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/ Ti...

...e startings of a good network setup here but I'm getting snowed under with other work. I'm looking for interested parties able to provide me with high level linux consultancy services to complete our setup, specifically: - SAMBA 3.0 BDC configuration tieing in to existing Win2K AD PDC over CIPE VPN (ideally also Win2K AD PDC config / optimisation to suit) - Configuration of group policies / profiles using SAMBA BDC / Win2K AD PDC - Joining Win2K Workstations and WinXP Pro laptops to BDC - Setup backup solutions for Win2K Desktops, XP Pro Laptops, using linux tools on the SAMBA BDC and se...

...longest "backward compatible" run of any vendor. Why? Because they adopt things early -- like GLibC 2, GCC 3, NPTL, etc... Heck, pretty much everything released for CL/EL2 (GLibC 2.2, GCC 2.96/3.0 -- RHL7.x/RHEL2.1) still runs on my latest Fedora Core 4 Test systems. > How was the CIPE author supposed to know that what would be > released as FC2 would have a changed kernel interface? My God, I actually can't believe you could even make such a statement. At this point, it's _futile_ to even really debate you anymore, you keep talking from a total standing of "assu...

...that routing stays correct and manageable. I will be using the following services: - 2.4 kernel (2.6 ?? QOS) (Why should I use 2.6 ?) - netfilter (firewalling) - shorewall (admin :) ) - zebra/ospfd (routing) - snmp (netflow, nic counters) - sshd - remote syslog - some kind of vpn (cipe for wireless ?) That''s my list of things I will be using. I am thinking about using the debian sarge tree, because I really like debian in the way it works (updating etc...). Maybe other distributions are more suiteable. I am willing to use a better/more suiteable distribution, that'&...

...unning with nufone account for inbound and outbound calls from the world... everything works quite nicely except that I noticed last night that when I have a call active from * to nufone, web surfing on the network slows to a crawl... additionally, I have a VPN tunnel to another office (using CIPE) and while inter-office (i.e. - SIP to SIP) calls are fine, I cannot call from the remote office to the outside world (SIP -> CIPE tunnel -> * -> IAX2 -> nufone) - the call goes through, but it breaks up and is not inteligible... now, I realize that there is a LOT of overhead in th...

...here -- they will blame Red Hat for issues with CentOS, or not realize that Red Hat really did take time, effort and extensive consideration to get it to work, and couldn't. And not only that, but when other distros ran into the same issues. > I'm not sure I believe that in the case of CIPE, since the 1.6 version > specifically addresses the changes in the 2.6 kernel and was available > well before FC3 or RHEL4 releases which did not include it again. Both FC3 and RHEL3 started with FC2. And FC2 has already been through 6 months of development and Fedora Core 3 was already ent...

...-boundary=2 -march=pentium4 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL/include/linux/modversions.h -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=module -c -o module.o module.c In file included from /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL/include/linux/if.h:23, from cipe.h:21, from module.c:15: /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL/include/linux/socket.h:264: invalid suffix on integer constant/usr/src/linux-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL/include/linux/socket.h:264: syntax error before numeric constant/usr/src/linux-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL/include/linux/socket.h:264: `memcpy_f...

...h CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RR=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_RANDOM=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_WRANDOM=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_DRR=y My configuration: A host with two ppp links. Ontop of these two ppp dialup links i have created two CIPE tunnels, one on each link. Both A and B are under my control. +----+ cipcb0/ppp0 +-----+ | |----------------------| | | A | | B | | | cipcb1/ppp1 | | | |----------------------| | +----+ +-----+ >From A''...

I've set up a CIPE VPN, between my notebook computer and my Linux based firewall. While the VPN generally works well, I've noticed a strange problem with file sharing from the local network to the notebook. I set up the VPN, with the idea of accessing my systems at home via a dial up ISP, to my home network...

...RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3. The patch I installed is routes-2.4.16-6.diff. I got no errors installing it. I added the multipath support, and recompiled it. The make dep and the make bzImage went fine. I got error during the make modules. These are the errors: Output.c: in function ''cipe_xmit'' Output.c:175 too few arguments to function ''ip_route_output'' Make[3]: *** [output.o] error 1 Make[3]: leaving directory ''/usr/src/linux-2.4.18-3/drivers/addon/cipe'' Make[2]: *** [_modsubdir_cipe] error 2 Make[2]: leaving directory ''/usr/sr...

From: Dag Wieers > Bryan, stop generalising and dramatising. What dramatising? At some point, several people decide that anything they dislike was said by me. Several other people said far more negative comments about CIPE than myself. Those comments have now been attributed to me. I purposely avoided making it about whether or not CIPE should or shouldn't not be included, just why it wasn't based on what I found. I recognize 99% of the people on this list didn't do that. > It's not you against...

...irewall Public IPs and NAT now the internet is intracity, within one provider and decently safe (6 hops), but still some sort of encryption would be nice... (otherwise I'd just use ip tunnel). How do I allow both BETA and X.Y.Z.0/24 to connect to the private IPs? Should I use CIPE? IPSEC? something else? any good howtos? Preferably something fast and reliable, doesn't need to be that easy to set up :) I'm basically looking for comments, I have looked around on google, and it seems there's _tons_ of options, but IPSEC seems to be winning out... am I correct in...

I have a set of RFC1918 networks -- a subdivided class C network where my local network is 192.168.0.0/25 and the remote is 192.168.0.128/25. I am using CIPE over an aDSL connection to make my local and remote nets talk to each other. My Samba server is located behind my firewall, i.e., NOT on the machine with the cipe interface. I cannot get name resolution for the remote Samba server even though the name is both in DNS and LMHOSTS. I CAN with SMB...

...a freeze point; Red Hat has > chosen the very documented 2-2-2 6-6-6 scheme, and sticks to its schedule, > for the most part. Or, to put it very bluntly, just exactly which of the > over a thousand packages are worth waiting on? And who decides which package > holds up progress? CIPE, the example used here, is relatively insecure to > begin with and interoperates with nobody. I don't see how you can call setting up a WAN with many CIPE nodes, then finding it unavailable in the next release 'long term stability'. > Better to use IPsec (which > virtually...

...ually exclusive -- especially the farther you move away from the economies of scale. I just find it humorous that several people who use CentOS, a free redistribution of RHEL (where Red Hat doesn't see a dime), are not complaining about Linus & co. for the kernel, not complaining about the CIPE team and their lack of movement on kernel 2.6, not volunteering to even look at the Bugzilla reports to find out what issues were blantantly repeatable, let alone other distros that have the same issues ... But blaming solely Red Hat for this issue (and this is just one example). But I expect tha...

...9;t properly use ssh for tunneling VNC or SMB shares or even cvs (with -Z option activated). P.S.: All the test I have made are based on ADSL 256/128 and RDSI connections. Also notice that all the VPN solutions I have tested provide for some method to control packet length to avoid problems .( CIPE, POPTOP, OpenVPN) so maybe is just a matter of "copy and paste" some free available code. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

...a small start-up company that installs traditional PBX (Nortel mainly) systems, data network infrastructure, commercial audio/video, residential audio/video/voice/data and we do lighting control systems... I've got two home offices about 30 miles apart - running some basic lan services over a CIPE link between here and there... this all started because I'd like to find a way to integrate the phone lines/system better... What really has me intriqued at the moment is the idea of using a VoIP service provider to make and recieve calls with an (800) for customers to call in on... iconne...