search for: cint2006

.../254.gap/254.gap 0.24% -0.98% 13.90% 1.50% SPEC/CINT2000/255.vortex/255.vortex 0.00% 0.00% 94.96% -6.59% SPEC/CINT2000/256.bzip2/256.bzip2 0.00% -0.09% 37.42% 1.84% SPEC/CINT2000/300.twolf/300.twolf 0.00% 0.00% 9.59% 0.96% SPEC/CINT2006/400.perlbench/400.perlbench 0.33% 0.40% 35.88% -2.45% SPEC/CINT2006/401.bzip2/401.bzip2 0.00% -0.94% 69.38% -0.94% SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc 0.76% 0.00% 48.35% 1.20% SPEC/CINT2006/429.mcf/429.mcf 0.00% -1.78% 11.88% 0.61% SPEC/...

...5687 0.0539 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan/automotive-susan.compile 6.33% > 1.0136 1.0778 0.0021 > External/SPEC/CINT95/134_perl/134_perl.compile 6.31% 6.3453 6.7457 0.0206 > External/SPEC/CFP2006/433_milc/433_milc.compile 6.29% 3.6706 3.9015 0.0293 > External/SPEC/CINT2006/462_libquantum/462_libquantum.compile 6.26% 0.9149 > 0.9722 0.0070 > MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff.compile 6.25% 0.8954 0.9514 0.0059 > External/SPEC/CINT2000/175_vpr/175_vpr.compile 6.23% 3.0709 3.2621 0.0103 > External/skidmarks10/skidmarks.compile 6.20% 1.9730 2.0953 0.0087 &g...

...iSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/Output/toast -2.7% External/SPEC/CINT95/134.perl/Output/134.perl -2.6% MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/jpeg/jpeg-6a/Output/cjpeg -2.6% MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/Output/oggenc -2.5% MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/Output/dbms -2.5% External/SPEC/CINT2006/473.astar/Output/473.astar -2.5% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/Output/simple_types_loop_invariant -2.5% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/loader/Output/loader -2.4% MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/Output/sim -2.4% External/SPEC/CFP2006/433.milc/Output/433.milc -2.4% External/SPEC/CINT95/124.m88ksim/...

...MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan/automotive-susan.compile 6.33% >> 1.0136 1.0778 0.0021 >> External/SPEC/CINT95/134_perl/134_perl.compile 6.31% 6.3453 6.7457 0.0206 >> External/SPEC/CFP2006/433_milc/433_milc.compile 6.29% 3.6706 3.9015 0.0293 >> External/SPEC/CINT2006/462_libquantum/462_libquantum.compile 6.26% 0.9149 >> 0.9722 0.0070 >> MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff.compile 6.25% 0.8954 0.9514 0.0059 >> External/SPEC/CINT2000/175_vpr/175_vpr.compile 6.23% 3.0709 3.2621 0.0103 >> External/skidmarks10/skidmarks.compile 6.20% 1.9730...

...ns/aha/aha.exec 12.07% 3.5424 3.9698 0.0002 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/bmm/bmm.exec 11.38% 2.2970 2.5585 0.0007 > External/SPEC/CFP2000/179_art/179_art.exec 10.95% 1.4190 1.5744 0.0013 > MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod.exec 6.81% 11.8149 12.6195 0.0267 > External/SPEC/CINT2006/458_sjeng/458_sjeng.exec 5.72% 6.0263 6.3711 0.0076 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign.exec 3.98% 29.8022 30.9869 0.0810 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3_1/fhourstones3_1.exec 3.88% 2.0729 2.1534 > 0.0010 > External/SPEC/CINT2000/256_bzip2/256_bzip2.exec 2.68% 10.3792 1...

...12.07% 3.5424 3.9698 0.0002 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/bmm/bmm.exec 11.38% 2.2970 2.5585 0.0007 >> External/SPEC/CFP2000/179_art/179_art.exec 10.95% 1.4190 1.5744 0.0013 >> MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod.exec 6.81% 11.8149 12.6195 0.0267 >> External/SPEC/CINT2006/458_sjeng/458_sjeng.exec 5.72% 6.0263 6.3711 0.0076 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign.exec 3.98% 29.8022 30.9869 0.0810 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3_1/fhourstones3_1.exec 3.88% 2.0729 2.1534 >> 0.0010 >> External/SPEC/CINT2000/256_bzip2/256_bzip2.exec...

...od/lencod <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.10=2> -1.01% 12.8763 12.7461 0.0244 CTMark/SPASS/SPASS <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.5=2> -1.01% 12.5048 12.3791 0.0340 Performance Improvements - Compile Time Δ Previous Current σ External/SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.14=2> -1.64% 54.0801 53.1930 - External/SPEC/CINT2006/400.perlbench/400.perlbench <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.7=2> -1.25% 19.1481 18.9091 - External/SPEC/CINT2006/445.gobmk/445.gobmk <ht...

...ly, this release has been very difficult and the list of regressions very high. The list has finally dwindled down to the following regressions: Linux/x86: SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench [ JIT Codegen, JIT] MultiSource/Applications/minisat/minisat [CBE] Darwin/x86: External/SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc [CBE, but works on mainline..] Darwin/ppc: SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench [ CBE ] External/SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc [ CBE] If anyone would like to volunteer to help track down these issues, it would be very much appreciated. You can grab the source tarballs...

> On Aug 18, 2020, at 16:59, Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote: > > Thanks for all the work. The reductions in stores look promising. Do you also have performance numbers how much this improves the execution time? Did you observe any regressions where MSSA resulted in fewer removed stores? I did not gather numbers for execution time yet, but I’ll try to share some

...1% >> 12.8763 12.7461 0.0244 >> CTMark/SPASS/SPASS >> <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.5=2> -1.01% >> 12.5048 12.3791 0.0340 >> >> >> Performance Improvements - Compile Time Δ Previous Current σ >> External/SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc >> <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.14=2> -1.64% >> 54.0801 53.1930 - >> External/SPEC/CINT2006/400.perlbench/400.perlbench >> <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.7=2> -1.25% >> 19.1481 18.90...

Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".

It appears that lnt has the capability to run the SPEC2000/2006/2017(maybe) tests from looking at the options and from poking around in the mailing list archives. Or does it? I experimented a bit and cannot get it to work right. However, it isn't really documented anywhere so maybe I didn't set it up properly. Plus there's all the mention of llvmgcc... So is anyone doing

...nts/2/graph?test.10=2> -1.01% 12.8763 12.7461 0.0244 >>> CTMark/SPASS/SPASS <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.5=2> -1.01% 12.5048 12.3791 0.0340 >>> >>> Performance Improvements - Compile Time Δ Previous Current σ >>> External/SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.14=2> -1.64% 54.0801 53.1930 - >>> External/SPEC/CINT2006/400.perlbench/400.perlbench <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.7=2> -1.25% 19.1481 18.9091 - >>> External/SPEC/CINT2006/...

...-1.49% X86_64 results on Intel Xeon E5-2690: Performance Regressions - execution_time Change MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2 5.62% Performance Improvements - execution_time Change SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake -4.43% External/SPEC/CINT2006/456.hmmer/456.hmmer -2.50% External/SPEC/CINT2006/464.h264ref/464.h264ref -1.60% MultiSource/Benchmarks/nbench/nbench -1.19% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects -1.07% I had a brief look at the regressions and they all look to be caused by getting bad luck...

...ts/2/graph?test.10=2> -1.01% 12.8763 12.7461 0.0244 >>> CTMark/SPASS/SPASS <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.5=2> -1.01% 12.5048 12.3791 0.0340 >>> >>> Performance Improvements - Compile Time Δ Previous Current σ >>> External/SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.14=2> -1.64% 54.0801 53.1930 - >>> External/SPEC/CINT2006/400.perlbench/400.perlbench <http://michaelsmacmini.local/perf/v4/nts/2/graph?test.7=2> -1.25% 19.1481 18.9091 - >>> External/SPEC/CINT2006/...

On CINT2006 ARM64/ref input/lto+pgo I practically measure no performance difference for the 7 benchmarks that compile. This includes bzip2 (although different source base than in CINT2000), mcf, hmmer, sjeng, h364ref, astar, xalancbmk On Sep 15, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:...

...le=on> > 1.89% 0.0688 0.0701 0.0003 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2FFreeBench%2Fpifft%2Fpifft.compile=on> > 1.89% 0.9002 0.9172 0.0024 > External/SPEC/CINT2006/403_gcc/403_gcc.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.External%2FSPEC%2FCINT2006%2F403_gcc%2F403_gcc.compile=on> > 1.88% 74.4328 75.8311 0.0762 > External/SPEC/CINT95/126_gcc/126_gcc.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/...

I'm planning on implementing a register allocator on LLVM and I've noticed that the LLVM test suite supports SPEC's CINT2006 benchmarks with some makefiles. Since SPEC seems to be way too expensive, but some (all?) of its programs are available for free, I was thinking of making my own SPEC-based test suite. How hard would it be for me to integrate whole-program benchmarks in LLVM? Thanks in advance. -------------- next...

> > * This claim is only partially tested, but I'm running the allocator right > now with the base constraints plus an extension which adds coalescing costs > and it's just passed CINT2006 without error. Not bad given that the > coalescing extension only took a couple of hours to write > Following up on this footnote - The PBQPBuilderWithCoalescing builder is now in the mainline. If anyone's looking for an example of how to add custom constraints this is a good one. Chee...

...because it needs to keep the bytecode in memory too? > MultiSource/Applications/minisat/minisat [CBE] CBE didn't fail for me with the prerelease package, instead JIT failed on minisat. Do you want me to retry with llvm 2.3 from the release branch? > > Darwin/x86: > External/SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc [CBE, but works on mainline..] > > Darwin/ppc: > SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench [ CBE ] > External/SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc [ CBE] Don't have a Mac, so I can't help here. Best regards, --Edwin