search for: chrism

...ally safe to export to everyone. Typical use # is to export it to your SMTP server so it can do SMTP AUTH lookups # using it. path = /var/spool/postfix/private/auth mode = 0660 user = postfix group = postfix } } } heres a sample line from one of the passwd files: chrism:{CRAM-MD5}a67a65704086a046b3f875d1eaac8cb5c6fd13406507fead30d9bcb1bf82b:1003:1003::/home/vmail/example.com and to login through SASL I am trying to use the username chrism at example.com when I use the full email address like this to login like this I get this output into my postfix log: Jul 10 1...

I've gotten roped into helping a local charity with some computing/infrastructure snafus. It seems their last good Samaritan installed Ubuntu all over the place and is "unavailable" now to clean up the mess. CentOS has made me somewhat lazy because everything just works out of the box for the most part and you've got the occasional "yum update". :) These are

I'm just wondering what folks are using to benchmark/tune large arrays these days. I've always used bonnie with file sizes 2-3 times physical RAM. Maybe there's a better way? Cheers,

I was asked this question today and frankly, I didn't know the answer. So I thought I'd post it here.... If you don't need to access greater than 4GB RAM, is there any benefit to running the 64-bit version of CentOS vs the 32-bit one? That's assuming, of course, that the target machine utilizes a 64-bit capable processor. I hadn't seen any noticeable difference, but I

.../www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8254569&type=product&id=1169512522677 I'm thinking about getting out of Dodge today to unwind so if you pick it up early today I can come up and help you install it and then just come home later in the day. Cheers, your son -- Chris Mauritz chrism at imntv.com EVP & Chief Technology Officer Global Music International http://www.imntv.com

I typed, "rm public/index.html" Got back, "''rm is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file." Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To

...way? This puts more of the burden on you, to conjure up a whole new project, but you're the one who wants it, so that seems fair. ☺ Then the people with more complicated CI setups, like Apple and Sony, can add the new thing at their leisure without worrying about the kind of disruption that ChrisM anticipates. It's not like the SCM history of debuginfo-tests is all that important; it's a *really* small project. --paulr From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Zachary Turner via llvm-dev Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2017 3:50 PM To: David Blaikie Cc: l...

I am looking for a way to upload a file to Rails 3 app, but without generating a temp file. Googling the issue gave me some insight in how the file upload works. As I understand Rails creates a temp file when the file size is larger than 20kb. Is there a way to change this limit and avoid the temp file generation? Another solution I was looking in was creating a Rack App and so avoid the file

What does this mean? chrism@server:~$ smbclient -L server added interface ip=192.168.1.1 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: Domain=[ACMELABS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.0.6] tree connect failed: code 0 chrism@server:~$ Thanks, Chris

...being part of a larger community means being willing to do things, sometimes, not exactly the “right” way, due to logistical reasons. I am not opposed to what you would like to do, I’m just furrowing my brow at the timeframe in which to do it. > > That said, I'd still like to hear from ChrisM and MikeE about why it will take so long, because on the surface it seems like a low-impact move. Past experience has taught me, anything I think is going to be simple and quick to fix, rarely ever turns out that way. While there will be a significant amount of work to change the way our bots wor...

...a larger community means being willing to do things, sometimes, not exactly the “right” way, due to logistical reasons. I am not opposed to what you would like to do, I’m just furrowing my brow at the timeframe in which to do it. > >> >> That said, I'd still like to hear from ChrisM and MikeE about why it will take so long, because on the surface it seems like a low-impact move. > > Past experience has taught me, anything I think is going to be simple and quick to fix, rarely ever turns out that way. While there will be a significant amount of work to change the way ou...

...t;> things, sometimes, not exactly the “right” way, due to logistical reasons. >>> I am not opposed to what you would like to do, I’m just furrowing my brow >>> at the timeframe in which to do it. >>> >>> >>> That said, I'd still like to hear from ChrisM and MikeE about why it >>> will take so long, because on the surface it seems like a low-impact move. >>> >>> >>> Past experience has taught me, anything I think is going to be simple >>> and quick to fix, rarely ever turns out that way. While there wil...

...imes, not exactly the “right” way, due to logistical reasons. >>>> I am not opposed to what you would like to do, I’m just furrowing my brow >>>> at the timeframe in which to do it. >>>> >>>> >>>> That said, I'd still like to hear from ChrisM and MikeE about why it >>>> will take so long, because on the surface it seems like a low-impact move. >>>> >>>> >>>> Past experience has taught me, anything I think is going to be simple >>>> and quick to fix, rarely ever turns out that w...

I have two identical servers. The only difference is that the first one has Maxtor 250G drives and the second one has Seagate 320G drives. OS: CentOS-4.4 (fully patched) CPU: dual Opteron 280 Memory: 16GB Raid card: 3ware 9550Sx-8LP Raid volume: 4-disk Raid 5 with NCQ and Write Cache enabled On the first server I have decent performance. Nothing spectacular, but good enough. The second one

I have two identical servers. The only difference is that the first one has Maxtor 250G drives and the second one has Seagate 320G drives. OS: CentOS-4.4 (fully patched) CPU: dual Opteron 280 Memory: 16GB Raid card: 3ware 9550Sx-8LP Raid volume: 4-disk Raid 5 with NCQ and Write Cache enabled On the first server I have decent performance. Nothing spectacular, but good enough. The second one

All, I would like to announce our Official CentOS CD/DVD Vendor Program. We currently have 3 vendors, and 2 more who are putting together their information. (Not bad ... the official program has been going for less than 12 hours :) The details of the program (how to get in it, what they give back to the CentOS Project, etc.) are here: http://www.centos.org/images/CentOS_CD_Vendors.pdf Here is

All, I would like to announce our Official CentOS CD/DVD Vendor Program. We currently have 3 vendors, and 2 more who are putting together their information. (Not bad ... the official program has been going for less than 12 hours :) The details of the program (how to get in it, what they give back to the CentOS Project, etc.) are here: http://www.centos.org/images/CentOS_CD_Vendors.pdf Here is

My Rails App makes quite a few calls (all different queries) to our Postgres DB. Each time I make a find_by_sql method call, a connection opens and then stays idle. Of course, after 500 or so of these idle postgres processes running, the DB refuses to let me make any more (and I can''t really add more to the postgres.conf). How do I make sure these connections get closed after each query?

Anyone else on the list using these tools? I grabbed the latest iteration using yum from Dag's repository, but I get random segfaults on a fully-patched 4.4 system on dual Opteron 275's from some of the utilities. Perhaps, it's some 64-bit vs 32-bit-ism? I'm not much of a programmer (actually, I'm a terrible programmer) so any suggestions would be very much appreciated.

Postfix appears to be running normally and is accepting/receiving mail as usual, but... I'm seeing lines like this in the message log: Sep 1 06:55:23 fender postfix/smtpd[11969]: sql_select option missing Sep 1 06:55:23 fender postfix/smtpd[11969]: auxpropfunc error no mechanism available Those seem to be sasl related, right? I'm not using sasl support (yet). Any clues to this