search for: chriscox

Manually.? Direct edit of passwd and group.Sent from my Sprint Phone.------ Original message------From: Rowland penny via sambaDate: Fri, Feb 28, 2020 2:04 AMTo: samba at lists.samba.org;Cc: Subject:Re: [Samba] auto_private_groups analogue?On 28/02/2020 00:00, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: > Maybe a workaround?? We use winbind and default domain.? Therefore > there are two records from

On 28/02/2020 13:24, chriscox--- via samba wrote: > Manually.? Direct edit of passwd and group.Sent from my Sprint Phone.------ Original message------From: Rowland penny via sambaDate: Fri, Feb 28, 2020 2:04 AMTo: samba at lists.samba.org;Cc: Subject:Re: [Samba] auto_private_groups analogue?On 28/02/2020 00:00, Christopher C...

...m:1 auth:1 winbind:1 vfs:2 idmap:1 quota:1 acls:1 locking:1 msdfs:1 dmapi:1 registry:1 scavenger:1 dns:1 ldb:1 tevent:1 auth_audit:3 -----Message d'origine----- De?: Jean-Louis Renaud <jean_louis.renaud at yahoo.fr> Envoy??: mardi 12 novembre 2019 21:02 ??: 'Christopher Cox' <chriscox at endlessnow.com> Objet?: RE: [Samba] Tracking of SAMBA users activity WHAOU! that's exactly what I was looking for and even more. thank you very much -----Message d'origine----- De?: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> De la part de Christopher Cox via samba Envoy??: mard...

What I'm offering is a solution. Again, what I proposed is a functional workaround. It's actually pretty natural and obvious when you get right down to it. On 2/28/20 8:00 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 28/02/2020 13:24, chriscox--- via samba wrote: >> Manually.? Direct edit of passwd and group.Sent from my Sprint Phone.------ >> Original message------From: Rowland penny via sambaDate: Fri, Feb 28, 2020 >> 2:04 AMTo: samba at lists.samba.org;Cc: Subject:Re: [Samba] auto_private_groups >> analogue?...

On 2/28/20 11:29 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 28/02/2020 17:18, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> What I'm offering is a solution. >> >> Again, what I proposed is a functional workaround.? It's actually pretty >> natural and obvious when you get right down to it. >> > No it isn't. If you try to add a local user to a domain joined Unix

On 5/11/20 10:11 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/05/2020 15:56, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> Of course, this really isn't "the problem".? Nothing wrong with apparmor or >> selinux.? The problem is assuming a "one set of rules fits all" mentality. >> >> I actually like apparmor.? But maybe if people knew how to use it to make

On 9/3/20 4:36 PM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 10:20:09PM +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> >> Red-Hat could make this more obvious >> by removing sssd-winbind-idmap, their documentation says it use isn't >> supported. > > Actually on a more serious note, Red Hat could make the > messaging around this a little clearer.

On 10/20/20 3:25 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 20/10/2020 21:09, Derek Lambert wrote: >> I really dislike Raspian, and there's not a 64bit release yet. >> >> Does the official Debian distro use Heimdal? Ubuntu? > > Cannot really speak for the rpi, I just use mine as a Unix domain member running > raspbian, but it is basically only the distros based on

On 7/6/20 1:09 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 06/07/2020 18:33, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> >> IMHO, these discussion are beneficial.? "compat" traces back to NIS (mostly), >> so usually means a "combo" search of "+/-" style NIS or other allow/deny >> sources in addition to /etc/passwd (group, etc.). >> >> This

On 9/27/19 1:39 PM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:36:42PM -0500, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> On 9/27/19 1:32 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> ....snippity... >>> I repeat, smbclient never had anything to do with network browsing, so >>> it is unlikely to have anything to do with Network Discovery. Perhaps >>> you

On 9/27/19 5:38 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:36:42PM -0500, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> On 9/27/19 1:32 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> ....snippity... >>> I repeat, smbclient never had anything to do with network browsing, so >>> it is unlikely to have anything to do with Network Discovery. Perhaps >>> you are

On 4/29/20 5:55 PM, miguel medalha via samba wrote: > I don't know exactly what you are trying to achieve, but isn't the notion of > "home folder" somewhat a thing of the past? I use Folder Redirection with > Windows 10 clients (and Windows 7 before) and it works like a charm. User > Profile folders are created automatically at first login. Furthermore, it > gives

On 9/27/19 10:39 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/09/2019 16:19, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> With the removal of SMB1 (by default) and everywhere (e.g. Windows), I >> noticed that when I open up a computer (\\computer-name) I can see the >> shares that I have access to... that is, from a Windows Explorer (in >> my case Win10).? Is there any way to

On 10/14/19 12:00 PM, Roy Eastwood via samba wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Gerard Seibert via samba >> Sent: 14 October 2019 17:09 >> To: samba at lists.samba.org >> Cc: Gerard Seibert >> Subject: Re: [Samba] Detect version of smb being employed >> >> On Mon, 14 Oct 2019

Of course, this really isn't "the problem". Nothing wrong with apparmor or selinux. The problem is assuming a "one set of rules fits all" mentality. I actually like apparmor. But maybe if people knew how to use it to make their own policies instead of accepting (note: In this case the "accept" is through the distribution's install) the assumptions of

With the removal of SMB1 (by default) and everywhere (e.g. Windows), I noticed that when I open up a computer (\\computer-name) I can see the shares that I have access to... that is, from a Windows Explorer (in my case Win10).? Is there any way to get something like this working using smbclient without SMB1? All this is without (AFAIK) enabling the Function Discovery stuff.? How does Windows

On 6/15/20 11:29 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: ... snippity > You also have 'unix password sync = Yes', you should remove this, you cannot > have users in /etc/passwd and AD. Actually, as far as a base statement, you can have both, that is, the idea of a username in Windows AD and the same username in /etc/passwd. The namespaces are not cojoined. However, that doesn't

On 9/27/19 1:39 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:36:42PM -0500, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> On 9/27/19 1:32 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> ....snippity... >>> I repeat, smbclient never had anything to do with network browsing, so >>> it is unlikely to have anything to do with Network Discovery. Perhaps >>> you are

On 9/27/19 12:48 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/09/2019 18:33, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> >> I understand the "Function Discovery" side and wsdd (which is fine for >> local same network discovery somewhat similar to Network >> Neighborhood). I'm saying that even without that if I browse to just a >> computer in Windows

On 9/27/19 1:11 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/09/2019 18:57, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> On 9/27/19 12:48 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 27/09/2019 18:33, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> I understand the "Function Discovery" side and wsdd (which is fine >>>> for local same network discovery