search for: chmodding

Hello :-) According to my reading of the rsyncd.conf man page, "incoming chmod" accepts comma-separated "chmod" strings as defined by the chmod(1) man page optionally prefixed by D or F to make them apply to directories or files. The local chmod(1) man page does not mention strings. It refers to modes which may be symbolic or octal/numeric. Accordingly I tried incoming

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Recent versions of rsync have a "regression test" called "chmod-option" that when run fails, this should be causing rsync to be rejected as broken by all distros and sysadmins. A bit of research show that no one has mentioned this test since it was last worked on in late September, nor does it show up as a current bug

Is it possible to set the u-g-o bits in a Rsync ? What I want to do is synce files from one machine to another (public web machine) so that all the files are READ-ONLY and, of course, the sub folders READ+EXECUTE-ONLY. Can't find any command line options or rsync.conf settings. Would be nice to have a --chmod-file=xxxx and a --chmod-folder=xxxx option, and with the same type of function in

Hi, There are 3 lld tests[1] that run the command `chmod 400` or `chmod u-w` and then check that lld generates a permission denied error when trying to write to the files. These tests fail when run as root, because `chmod 400` is not enough to prevent root from writing to files. Is there some other way we can tests this, or should we just not support running tests as root? A related question I

I want to change the permissions on directories, recursively to: drwxr-xr-x but keep the files within the directory tree as: -rw-r--r-- But I can't find an option for chmod to only affect directories. I suppose it won't hurt (in this case) to set the x for the files, but I want some consistancy.

There is an error in the chmod(1) man page. tingo at kg-v2$ uname -a FreeBSD kg-v2.kg4.no 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #6: Fri Apr 27 23:50:55 CEST 2012 root at kg-v2.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 tingo at kg-v2$ apropos ^sticky sticky(7) - sticky text and append-only directories tingo at kg-v2$ man 1 chmod | grep sticky 1000 (the sticky bit). See chmod(2)

background: One of our developers is just getting started with Capistrano, just getting together a rudimentary deploy.rb, copied from one of our contract developers who is just getting started a bit too. I''m the systems manager and a complete Rails and Ruby newbie (who, by the way, cannot thank Zed Shaw enough for mongrel and Bradley Taylor enough for mongrel_cluster :-)

Hi, quick patch to ssh-copy-id to make it set the file modes more correctly. Thanks, Matthew --- contrib/ssh-copy-id.orig Thu Sep 27 21:47:44 2001 +++ contrib/ssh-copy-id Thu Sep 27 21:47:52 2001 @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ exit 1 fi -{ eval "$GET_ID" ; } | ssh $1 "test -d .ssh || mkdir .ssh ; cat >> .ssh/authori zed_keys ; chmod g-w . .ssh .ssh/authorized_keys" +{ eval

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11027 Bug ID: 11027 Summary: Sticky bit not set when using --chmod=D+t alone, without --perms Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

Hello.. I've asked this question before without getting any further help really.. When a new user is added using "adduser" on 5.x (havn't really checked if it's the same under 4.x or not), the default homedir permission is 755 (drwxr-xr-x) which to me, looks a bit insecure? It's of course pretty easy to solve it by a simple chmod, but yet, isn't there anyway to

i am invoking op from a python proggy which does an op.system() of op chmod 640 /usr/local/etc/tac_plus.conf i get "Permission denied by op" % ls -l /usr/local/etc/op.access -r-------- 1 root wheel 149 Jan 13 07:41 /usr/local/etc/op.access % cat /usr/local/etc/op.access # 2007.01.13 # #DEFAULT users=src # chown /usr/sbin/chown $* ; users=src chmod /bin/chmod $* ; users=src

Is it possible to set the permissions on the destination side? As I understand it, --chmod just pretends certain permissions are coming from the sending side. I'd like to be able to set permissions to readonly in the destination while coming from a --copy/link-dest which may more may not have had it's permissions changed.

Which is the Kernel API (Xenbus API) that is available to do a similar action as "xenstore-chmod"?? Thx, Venkat _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Running rsync 2.6.8 as daemon on Fedora core 4. Have the following in the rsyncd.conf file... [test] path = /home/test/greenlight # use chroot = true max connections = 3 lock file = /var/lock/rsyncd/test.lock uid = 503 gid = 503 auth users = test incoming chmod = Dg=s,Dug=rwx,Do-rwx,Fug=rw,Fo-rwx Uploading a tree from windows with

On 05/02/18 05:53, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Dave Gordon via rsync > <rsync at lists.samba.org <mailto:rsync at lists.samba.org>> wrote: > > [...fake-super symlink saved as a file...] > > This results in the copy being world-writable. > > Indeed. The file initially gets created as a mode-600 file, but the code > later

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4138 Summary: Incoming chmod can't override inherited directory setgid Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

Hi OpenSSH developers, I'm using OpenSSH on a daily basis and I'm very pleased with the work you've done. I am contributing to some Open Source software hosted at Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/tsp and we recently hit some sftp unexpected behavior: https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?105838 when using chmod sftp client command it appears that setuid / setgid bits are

Hello, I've got a CentOS box and users are putting Windows long files on it, files with " " and " - " in their filenames. I'm trying to adjust the permissions as well as user and group membership and i'd like the changes to be sticky. On the tld i've set permissions of 2755 and am trying to batch convert the files and subfolders in it. I've done this: find

Hi, Until a few months ago, when I had to setup a web server under CentOS, I assigned (I'm not sure about the correct english verb for "chown"ing) all the web pages to the apache user and group. To give you an example, let's say I have a static website under /var/www/myserver on a CentOS server running Apache. Then I would configure permissions for the web content like this: #

I read this (http://www.petur.eu/blog/?p=459) blog post today. It's about that a remote user with root privilegs to a FreeBSD jail & user privileges to the jails host machine can obtain root privileges on the host machine. Can someone confirm if this bugg/exploit works?