search for: checkmarks

Hi Rowland, my users are known to the OS, they also have the correct permissions to alter the settings. Doing so on the CLI does work when logged in via SSH. When opening the Security Tab the users and groups are displayed, only on directories there are no checkmarks under Read, Write etc. I also cannot set any checkmarks for Read, Write etc. When viewing the Security Tab of a file everything works and I can see and set the checkmarks. Do you know what could be wrong? Greetings, Felix -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lis...

...s 'getent passwd <username>' produce ? Rowland > , they also have the correct permissions to alter the settings. > Doing so on the CLI does work when logged in via SSH. > > When opening the Security Tab the users and groups are displayed, only on directories there are no checkmarks under Read, Write etc. > I also cannot set any checkmarks for Read, Write etc. > > When viewing the Security Tab of a file everything works and I can see and set the checkmarks. > > Do you know what could be wrong? > > Greetings, > Felix > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachrich...

.... Why o why does a server has a DHCP IP.. But ok.. That your choise. Disable ipv6 on the windows server try again. That just a checkmark and much less risk. That "should" work also. Or set dedicated ip's. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Paul Littlefield [mailto:info at paully.co.uk] > Verzonden: woensdag 4 maart 2020 16:47 > Aan:

Hello. Package Manager reports (with a green checkmark) that I have java-1.6.0 installed on my machine (running Cent 5.3), but it seems to not be running. I used http://java.com/en/download/help/testvm.xml and got "Something is wrong. Java is not working." Perhaps I'm confused on which program I need to use java-coded apps. PM lists this app as "OpenJDK Runtime

On 24/04/19 19:51, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai, > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >> Rowland Penny via samba >> Verzonden: woensdag 24 april 2019 12:13 >> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] User mapping/login issue >> >> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:38:58 +0200

...s 'getent passwd <username>' produce ? Rowland > , they also have the correct permissions to alter the settings. > Doing so on the CLI does work when logged in via SSH. > > When opening the Security Tab the users and groups are displayed, only on directories there are no checkmarks under Read, Write etc. > I also cannot set any checkmarks for Read, Write etc. > > When viewing the Security Tab of a file everything works and I can see and set the checkmarks. > > Do you know what could be wrong? > > Greetings, > Felix > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachrich...

...name>' produce ? > > Rowland > >> , they also have the correct permissions to alter the settings. >> Doing so on the CLI does work when logged in via SSH. >> >> When opening the Security Tab the users and groups are displayed, only on directories there are no checkmarks under Read, Write etc. >> I also cannot set any checkmarks for Read, Write etc. >> >> When viewing the Security Tab of a file everything works and I can see and set the checkmarks. >> >> Do you know what could be wrong? >> >> Greetings, >> Felix >&...

I would like to use Photomatix Pro 3.1.3 on my WINE install. I was able to successfully install it after installing corefonts and .NET 2.0 using winetricks. The program opens fine but none of the buttons, checkmarks, or other window dressings appear: [Image: http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/7739/photomatix.png ] I have several other applications installed in WINE and none of them exhibit this strange behavior. Moreover, I installed Photomatix 3.0.3 and it also looks like this, but Photomatix 2.5.4 looks norma...

On 3/1/23 17:54, Eric Blake wrote: > I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the > grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have > Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms. > > This series got me to a green checkmark: > https://gitlab.com/ebblake/nbdkit/-/pipelines/793156983 > > but depends on an as-yet

...commending it. I have already set 'nt acl support = yes' in smb.conf file. In Win2K, when I try to access the security properties on a Samba share I have full rights to, all users are shown as not having any permissions. If I attempt to change ACL information, the check boxes get checkmarks, but when I close and re-open, all checkmarks are gone. When I click the advanced button, permissions are shown accurately. When I attempt to access security permissions on a directory (Samba share) I have full rights on from a Windows NT server I get a "The system cannot find the file sp...

Ps. Smb1 in Win10 ! I mean ofcourse.. Step 1: Go to Start button and type Control Panel. You will get Control Panel; Desktop app. Click on it. Step 2: You will get a window with a list of software on it, go to the left side of the panel and click Turn Windows Features On or Off. Step 3: You need to remove the checkmark beside SMB 1.0/CFs File Sharing Support to disable SMB1 for good. If you

Hi Rowland, when saying 'I' I theoretically meant any user that has write access to the share. It should be possible to right click the directory in windows, the go to security tab and remove the write permissions on the directory. This behaviour already works with files, I'm trying to figure out how to make it also work for directories. Greetings, Felix -----Ursprüngliche

...; >> Rowland >> >>> , they also have the correct permissions to alter the settings. >>> Doing so on the CLI does work when logged in via SSH. >>> >>> When opening the Security Tab the users and groups are displayed, only on directories there are no checkmarks under Read, Write etc. >>> I also cannot set any checkmarks for Read, Write etc. >>> >>> When viewing the Security Tab of a file everything works and I can see and set the checkmarks. >>> >>> Do you know what could be wrong? >>> >>>...

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:32 AM Philippe LeCavalier < support at plecavalier.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:43 AM Philippe LeCavalier < > support at plecavalier.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > First off, I really don't know what to provide so please just ask what is > needed. Here's what I think is relevant starting with a brief description:

Hai, I see Rowland helped a bit already and good things going here.. For you setup, this is how i do my setup. First your data path /fs/gf /fs/othere_path.. I normaly start with : chmod 2775 /fs chown root:"Domain Admins" ( optional share \\server\fs$ ) chmod 2775 /fs/gf chown root:"Domain Admins" ( or chmod -R ... but i dont know if you already did setup more )

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 25 april 2019 11:09 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] User mapping/login issue > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:24:36 +0200 > L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > > > Ps.

Here are some notes/observations I've done on my setup that works for me. Hopefully it will be added to some r-forge documentation/wiki. I use: Windows Vista Business SP2 32bit TortoiseSVN 1.6.7 (Build 18415 - 32 Bit , 2010/01/22 17:55:06) PuTTY v0.60 (with Pageant v0.60) I have a deprecated r-forge project ('r-oo') that I will use through out. My r-forge username is

On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 06:43:11PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 3/1/23 17:54, Eric Blake wrote: > > I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the > > grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have > > Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms. > > > > This series got me to a green checkmark: > >

Hello, I've recently saw a discussion on this list, about a standardised way of emptying POP3 mailboxes on the server - but no solution came up. Please provide a suggestion for the following situation: - I am running a stock POP3 dovecot server, on Fedora 12 (dovecot version 1.2.9) - passwd-file authentication via /etc/imap.passwd - users are virtual, sharing the same UID/GID; -

Ok that looks good. Ont to try on the pc your testing. Disable ipv6 ( just remove the checkmark dont remove it. ) from the network adapter. *( optional : http://www.bvanleeuwen.nl/faq/?p=1142 ipv6 admx template. ) I have a setup with this admx, i completely disabled ipv6 in my lan. And as Rowland also is telling.. Dns domain = foo Realm = FOO Workgroup = FOO