search for: checkbuilt

I installed R-2.9.0 yesterday, and followed the instructions in the R for Windows FAQ, 2.8 What's the best way to upgrade? It reads "run update.packages(checkBuilt=TRUE, ask=FALSE) in the new R and then delete anything left of the old installation." I did this but it returned an error. It's the checkBuilt=TRUE which causes it, though I don't know why: leaving it out or changing it to checkBuilt=FALSE do not return errors. > update.packages(...

update.packages(checkBuilt = TRUE) fails with: > update.packages(checkBuilt = TRUE) rpanel : Version 1.0-6 installed in /usr/lib64/R/library built under R 2.15.0 Version 1.1-1 available at http://mirrors.softliste.de/cran Update (y/N/c)? y trying URL 'http://mirrors.softliste.de/cran/src/contrib/rpanel_1.1-1.tar....

The checkBuilt argument to update.packages() currently defaults to FALSE. This means that packages built and installed under R 3.6.2 will not be updated by R 4.0.0, and leads to confusion (e.g. https://stackoverflow.com/q/60356442/2554330, where tidyverse can't be updated because some of its many depende...

...t are included in base R, since R is looking in my private library first and when it finds the package it tries to use it. But it’s an outdated version. The easiest solution I can think of is to update both libraries, but when I run update.packages(lib.loc=”private library location” ask = FALSE, checkBuilt=TRUE) it’s not updating them. So I was wondering if there is a way to update all packages that occur in all libraries? (Note that I can think of other solutions to my problem, but they are all time consuming and defeats the purpose of why I want a private library i.e. it makes updating R e...

update.packages(ask=F, checkBuilt=T) FUNCIONA BIEN, ESTOY ACTUALIZANDO El 4/5/20, Emilio L. Cano <emilopezcano en gmail.com> escribió: > Sí la hay, yo antes lo hacía. Pero ahora pienso como Hadley: > https://twitter.com/hadleywickham/status/1254387031842701312 > <https://twitter.com/hadleywickham/status/12543870...

> On 19 Jul 2015, at 06:05 , Jose Claudio Faria <joseclaudio.faria at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > >> version > _ > platform x86_64-w64-mingw32 > arch x86_64 > os mingw32 > system x86_64, mingw32 > status Patched > major 3 > minor 2.1 > year 2015 > month

On 29/07/2015 12:55 PM, Michael Friendly wrote: > On 7/19/2015 3:50 AM, peter dalgaard wrote: > >> For some, but not allI repositories I get the error message below: > >> >Error in install.packages(update[instlib == l, "Package"], l, contriburl = > >> >contriburl, : > >> > specifying 'contriburl' or 'available' requires a

On 06/08/2015 7:16 PM, Jose Claudio Faria wrote: > I'd like to see a reproducible example before I declared it to be a > bug that needs fixing. > > Do note the news item in R-patched (soon to be R 3.2.2): > > | - download.packages()| failed for |type| equal to either |"both"| > or |"binary"|. (Reported by Dan Tenenbaum.) > >

...encies were built under a prior > version of R. > > Reading ?update.packages() I did not see an option that would > automatically update dependences built under an earlier version of R. Is > there such an option that I missed? > I think you want update.packages(ask = FALSE, checkBuilt = TRUE) to automatically update all packages and their dependencies. With the default checkBuilt=FALSE, R just sees whether a dependency is a high enough version number. But packages installed under R x.y.z are not usable in R x.y+1.w. Duncan Murdoch > Alternatively, is there a funct...

On 7/19/2015 3:50 AM, peter dalgaard wrote: >> For some, but not allI repositories I get the error message below: >> >Error in install.packages(update[instlib == l, "Package"], l, contriburl = >> >contriburl, : >> > specifying 'contriburl' or 'available' requires a single type, not type = >> >"both" >> >

R-3.5.0 is installed here. When I tried to update installed packages errors were reported when their dependencies were built under a prior version of R. Reading ?update.packages() I did not see an option that would automatically update dependences built under an earlier version of R. Is there such an option that I missed? Alternatively, is there a function I can run that will rebuild all

> > I'd like to see a reproducible example before I declared it to be a bug > that needs fixing. > > Do note the news item in R-patched (soon to be R 3.2.2): > > | - download.packages()| failed for |type| equal to either |"both"| or > |"binary"|. (Reported by Dan Tenenbaum.) > > install.packages() can call download.packages(), so this might

I have just upgraded from 2.9.2 to 2.10.1 on my XP machine. I rec'd the following error message: Error in strsplit(x[ok], "[.-]") : 5 arguments passed to .Internal(strsplit) which requires 6 I also tried update.packages(checkBuilt=TRUE, ask = FALSE) > update.packages(checkBuilt=TRUE, ask=FALSE) Error: could not find function "update.packages" Has anyone else experienced this - what is the fix ? Thanks in advance. Steve Friedman Ph. D. Spatial Statistical Analyst Everglades and Dry Tortugas National Park 950...

R-help, I recently updated R from 2.13.0 to 2.13.1 (32-bit Windows version) and now have a problem updating packages. I am running Windows 7 as operating system. As the FAQ suggests, I uninstalled 2.13.0 before installing 2.13.1. On first opening R, I ran "update.packages(checkBuilt=TRUE, ask=FALSE) ras also recommended and selected the NS Cran mirror. On doing this the following error messages occurs: update.packages(checkBuilt=TRUE, ask=FALSE) --- Please select a CRAN mirror for use in this session --- Warning in install.packages(update[instlib == l, "Package"], l...

Dear all, Since some weeks, look like the following CRAN mirrors are no longer accessible for package update: http://cran.univ-lyon1.fr http://mirror.ibcp.fr/pub/CRAN/ > update.packages(ask='graphics',checkBuilt=TRUE) Warning: unable to access index for repository http://cran.univ-lyon1.fr/bin/windows/contrib/2.14 update.packages(ask='graphics',checkBuilt=TRUE) Warning: unable to access index for repository http://mirror.ibcp.fr/pub/CRAN/bin/windows/contrib/2.14 Furthermore, attempting to conne...

Hello, > version _ platform x86_64-w64-mingw32 arch x86_64 os mingw32 system x86_64, mingw32 status Patched major 3 minor 2.1 year 2015 month 07 day 16 svn rev 68681 language R version.string R version 3.2.1 Patched (2015-07-16 r68681) nickname World-Famous Astronaut I

...the original update.packages) With much respect, Tal ############################### update.packages.2 <- function (lib.loc = NULL, repos = getOption("repos"), contriburl = contrib.url(repos, type), method, instlib = NULL, ask = TRUE, available = NULL, oldPkgs = NULL, ..., checkBuilt = FALSE, type = getOption("pkgType"), subset) { force(ask) text.select <- function(old) { update <- NULL for (k in seq_len(nrow(old))) { cat(old[k, "Package"], ":\n", "Version", old[k, "Installed"],...

...> fit <- coxph(Surv(exit, event) ~ x, data = mort) > | > | I get > | > | Error in fitter(X, Y, strats, offset, init, control, weights = weights, : > | object 'Ccoxmart' not found > | > | I was told on R-help that I need to > | > | > update.packages(checkBuilt = TRUE) > | > | (and it works), but > | > | 1. I get two versions of recommended packages, one in > | /usr/lib/R/library, and one in > > That is from apt / dpkg -- ie pre-packaged. > > | ~/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.4 > | I could fix a write permission in /usr/lib...

...library(survival, lib.loc = "/usr/lib/R/library") > fit <- coxph(Surv(exit, event) ~ x, data = mort) I get Error in fitter(X, Y, strats, offset, init, control, weights = weights, : object 'Ccoxmart' not found I was told on R-help that I need to > update.packages(checkBuilt = TRUE) (and it works), but 1. I get two versions of recommended packages, one in /usr/lib/R/library, and one in ~/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.4 I could fix a write permission in /usr/lib/R or run R as root. 2. Installing from scratch should have this fixed automatically, right? Thanks, G?r...

...libgfortran.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Error in library(Hmisc) : .First.lib failed for 'Hmisc' If I manually do a re-install, then Hmisc and the other packages are fine. I ?THINK? that if I had been using version 2.2.0, and now I have 2.2.1, then the checkBuilt option would force a rebuild on all packages. Right? I'm pasting in below the script that I run nightly to update all packages and install any new ones in CRAN. Can anybody suggest changes that might cause a rebuild of packages that need rebuilding? ## PJ 2005-11-05 options(repos = "h...