search for: check_summary

We've added a column at http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html of test results using the Sun Studio compiler: it is intended that these will be updated weekly. The Sun Studio compiler is that used on Solaris: these runs were on the Linux version. All the other platforms are using gcc 4, so this provides an opportunity for checking for use of gcc-spe...

...Solaris: the R-admin manual in this version contains detailed instructions on what works for us (Solaris Studio 12.2 and 12u1, and gcc4 on Sparc) and what doesn't (gcc on amd64) and why. Package maintainers should review the results for their packages at http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html and submit updates if needed as soon as possible and definitely well before April 13. That page is in the process of migration to R-prerel: for now the most useful columns are r-devel (Fedora), r-devel (Windows, really R-prerel) and the Solaris x86 column. Brian Ripley (for the R-core tea...

...vailable on Ubuntu/Linux? If not can I compile the source code of those package ? Has any one of you used the packages on Ubuntu ? You can get the status of efforts to compile packages on the various machine avaialbe to CRAN at the CRAN package checks page: https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html -- David Winsemius Alameda, CA, USA

...FYI, this problem is causing most of the Bioconductor packages to be red on Windows on our daily build/check report: http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/2.7/bioc-LATEST/ OTOH I don't see anything like that on the check summaries for CRAN packages: http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html Maybe because CRAN only runs R CMD check which is still Perl-based? Thanks, H. -- Herv? Pag?s Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M2-B876 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpages at f...

...part of that work, Duncan has written a parser which has revealed many problems in package help files, and we have added its checks to 'R CMD check' in the R-devel version of R. You can see the results for CRAN packages as part of the daily check at http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html: they will show up as 'WARN' in the first two columns: click on the link to see the details for the package you are interested in. The dialect of Rd markup for which the parser checks differs in some ways from that described previously: see http://developer.r-project.org/parseRd.p...

Dear Experts , I am using R with Spark on Windows and now there is a need to move to Ubuntu. I wanted to know if most of the packages that are available on windows , would they be available on Ubuntu/Linux? If not can I compile the source code of those package ? Has any one of you used the packages on Ubuntu ? Thanks in Advance.

...inux? If not can I compile the source code of those package ? Has any one of you used the packages on Ubuntu ? > > You can get the status of efforts to compile packages on the various machine avaialbe to CRAN at the CRAN package checks page: > > https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html > After scraping that page with rvest::read_html I then used `table` to summarize. I posted the full output at the end of this but here are the relevant rows for Debian (for the Ubuntu option) and the Windows platforms tested: > res_tbl $`r-develLinuxx86_64(Debian GCC)` ERROR...

...can I compile the source code of those package ? Has any one of you used the packages on Ubuntu ? >> >> You can get the status of efforts to compile packages on the various machine avaialbe to CRAN at the CRAN package checks page: >> >> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html >> > > After scraping that page with rvest::read_html I then used `table` to summarize. I posted the full output at the end of this but here are the relevant rows for Debian (for the Ubuntu option) and the Windows platforms tested: > >> res_tbl > $`r-develLinuxx86_64(De...

Dear users, I've noticed some time ago that some of the packages I use (especially doBy) could not run (yet) on R 2.11. So I kept on using R 2.10. But I think it should be fine by now. So my question is how do I check whether a package is compatible with the last version of R? How can I check whether it works perfectly or whether there are still some bugs to be fixed? I could ask the

...intention is that in R 2.8.0 the out-of-the-box default devices will all be functions, so point 1 will apply. (dev.new will be more sophisticated there.) Many of the packages concerned are now showing ERROR in the 'r-devel Linux x86_64' section of http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html -- Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fa...

...l https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-January/056411.html The MinGW-w64 snapshots have moved back to gcc pre-4.4.4 (from pre-4.5.0) with static linking to C++ and Fortran run-time DLLs, and seem more stable. Currently the CRAN package check pages at http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html are showing 101/2182 failures, but ca 40 packages are failing on all 64-bit platforms in R-devel, and 21 further CRAN packages (plus Rgraphviz and a couple of Omegahat packages) are available on CRANextras after manual tweaking. At one point we had installed all the BioC dependencies of...

The packages link on CRAN (http://cran.at.r-project.org/) seems to be broken. Paul Object not found! The requested URL was not found on this server. The link on the referring page<http://cran.at.r-project.org/navbar.html> seems to be wrong or outdated. Please inform the author of that page <http://cran.at.r-project.org/navbar.html> about the error.

I'm having trouble building some packages while running Debian Lenny (testing) and suspect that the issues are related to the default use of gcc-4.3. With Lenny, build-essentials depends on 4.3, so I'd like to leave it installed but have also installed 4.2.1. How do I tell ./configure the path to 4.2.1 ? I"m sure it's an option, but I don't see it documented in the R-admin

A while ago I decided to simply download and install every package on CRAN (disk space is cheap these days...). In the process, I kept loose track of which packages generated one or more 'compilation errors' during the install process (machine runs 64-bit Fedora 8, gcc 4.1 etc. etc). Most of the errors seemed to occur in packages I have little need for at present, but as a courtesy, I

It seems that many package authors do not proofread the help installed with their packages. The Rd converter is not a parser, and it will silently produce incorrect results on incorrect input (and some correct input). Here are a few hints about some common errors: 1) When you run R CMD check you get a PDF manual at <pkg>.Rcheck/<pkg>-manual.pdf. Read through it looking for

Hi I have submitted a package (rioja) to CRAN. It checks OK for all R versions and OS's except r-release-macosx-ix86 where it fails when checking the examples. Specifically, it fails because R can't find the package vegan which is needed in a function. Here is the snippet from the check results: ### Begin snippet checking examples ... ERROR Running examples in 'rioja-Ex.R'

## Hello.. I have asked a similar question, but this is not fixed as before. ## I am running the following using Ubuntu OS: R version 2.13.1 (2011-07-08) Copyright (C) 2011 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0 Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) ## when I do this: > install.packages("mapproj", dependencies=T) ## I get this: Installing package(s)