David Winsemius
2016-Apr-23 14:43 UTC
[R] CRAN package check results tabulated ... wasRe: Number of package in Ubuntu
> On Apr 23, 2016, at 6:56 AM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: > > >> On Apr 22, 2016, at 11:51 AM, mylisttech at gmail.com wrote: >> >> Dear Experts , >> >> I am using R with Spark on Windows and now there is a need to move to Ubuntu. I wanted to know if most of the packages that are available on windows , would they be available on Ubuntu/Linux? If not can I compile the source code of those package ? Has any one of you used the packages on Ubuntu ? > > You can get the status of efforts to compile packages on the various machine avaialbe to CRAN at the CRAN package checks page: > > https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html >After scraping that page with rvest::read_html I then used `table` to summarize. I posted the full output at the end of this but here are the relevant rows for Debian (for the Ubuntu option) and the Windows platforms tested:> res_tbl$`r-develLinuxx86_64(Debian GCC)` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 261 59 4150 28 3994 35 25 $`r-develWindowsix86+x86_64` ERROR ERROR* NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 295 124 1 3962 25 4064 36 45 $`r-patchedLinuxx86_64` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 259 54 4153 28 3998 35 25 $`r-releaseLinuxx86_64` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 268 54 2578 18 5569 45 20 $`r-releaseWindowsix86+x86_64` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 324 70 2187 16 5885 46 24 $`r-oldrelWindowsix86+x86_64` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN WARN* 532 159 1605 13 6028 45 168 2 I think the various "NOTE" and "WARN" categories in most cases should be interpreted as "probably OK". It's those initial <blank>'s and ERROR categories that would most likely be the ones affecting users. -- David Winsemius Alameda, CA, USA --------- full tables-------- Tabulate on just the first letter of hte result:> t(res_tbl2)blank E N O W r-develLinuxx86_64(Debian GCC) 261 59 4178 4029 25 r-develLinuxx86_64(Fedora Clang) 265 66 4191 4001 29 r-develLinuxx86_64(Fedora GCC) 265 60 4204 3991 32 r-develOS Xx86_64(Clang) 294 70 4075 4081 32 r-develWindowsix86+x86_64 295 125 3987 4100 45 r-patchedLinuxx86_64 259 54 4181 4033 25 r-patchedSolarissparc 364 131 4082 3909 66 r-patchedSolarisx86 343 106 4091 3965 47 r-releaseLinuxx86_64 268 54 2596 5614 20 r-releaseOS Xx86_64(Mavericks) 255 174 2337 5718 68 r-releaseWindowsix86+x86_64 324 70 2203 5931 24 r-oldrelWindowsix86+x86_64 532 159 1618 6073 170 Tablulate on full message:> res_tbl$`r-develLinuxx86_64(Debian GCC)` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 261 59 4150 28 3994 35 25 $`r-develLinuxx86_64(Fedora Clang)` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 265 66 4179 12 3982 19 29 $`r-develLinuxx86_64(Fedora GCC)` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 265 60 4191 13 3972 19 32 $`r-develOS Xx86_64(Clang)` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 294 70 4066 9 4068 13 32 $`r-develWindowsix86+x86_64` ERROR ERROR* NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 295 124 1 3962 25 4064 36 45 $`r-patchedLinuxx86_64` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 259 54 4153 28 3998 35 25 $`r-patchedSolarissparc` ERROR ERROR* NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN WARN* 364 129 2 4006 76 3839 70 65 1 $`r-patchedSolarisx86` ERROR ERROR* NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 343 105 1 4062 29 3945 20 47 $`r-releaseLinuxx86_64` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 268 54 2578 18 5569 45 20 $`r-releaseOS Xx86_64(Mavericks)` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 255 174 2335 2 5716 2 68 $`r-releaseWindowsix86+x86_64` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN 324 70 2187 16 5885 46 24 $`r-oldrelWindowsix86+x86_64` ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN WARN* 532 159 1605 13 6028 45 168 2
boB Rudis
2016-Apr-24 11:51 UTC
[R] CRAN package check results tabulated ... wasRe: Number of package in Ubuntu
Or grab https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results.rds and read it w/o the need for scraping. On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 10:43 AM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote:> >> On Apr 23, 2016, at 6:56 AM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: >> >> >>> On Apr 22, 2016, at 11:51 AM, mylisttech at gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> Dear Experts , >>> >>> I am using R with Spark on Windows and now there is a need to move to Ubuntu. I wanted to know if most of the packages that are available on windows , would they be available on Ubuntu/Linux? If not can I compile the source code of those package ? Has any one of you used the packages on Ubuntu ? >> >> You can get the status of efforts to compile packages on the various machine avaialbe to CRAN at the CRAN package checks page: >> >> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html >> > > After scraping that page with rvest::read_html I then used `table` to summarize. I posted the full output at the end of this but here are the relevant rows for Debian (for the Ubuntu option) and the Windows platforms tested: > >> res_tbl > $`r-develLinuxx86_64(Debian GCC)` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 261 59 4150 28 3994 35 25 > > $`r-develWindowsix86+x86_64` > > ERROR ERROR* NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 295 124 1 3962 25 4064 36 45 > > $`r-patchedLinuxx86_64` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 259 54 4153 28 3998 35 25 > > $`r-releaseLinuxx86_64` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 268 54 2578 18 5569 45 20 > > $`r-releaseWindowsix86+x86_64` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 324 70 2187 16 5885 46 24 > > $`r-oldrelWindowsix86+x86_64` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN WARN* > 532 159 1605 13 6028 45 168 2 > > I think the various "NOTE" and "WARN" categories in most cases should be interpreted as "probably OK". It's those initial <blank>'s and ERROR categories that would most likely be the ones affecting users. > > -- > > David Winsemius > Alameda, CA, USA > > --------- full tables-------- > Tabulate on just the first letter of hte result: > >> t(res_tbl2) > blank E N O W > r-develLinuxx86_64(Debian GCC) 261 59 4178 4029 25 > r-develLinuxx86_64(Fedora Clang) 265 66 4191 4001 29 > r-develLinuxx86_64(Fedora GCC) 265 60 4204 3991 32 > r-develOS Xx86_64(Clang) 294 70 4075 4081 32 > r-develWindowsix86+x86_64 295 125 3987 4100 45 > r-patchedLinuxx86_64 259 54 4181 4033 25 > r-patchedSolarissparc 364 131 4082 3909 66 > r-patchedSolarisx86 343 106 4091 3965 47 > r-releaseLinuxx86_64 268 54 2596 5614 20 > r-releaseOS Xx86_64(Mavericks) 255 174 2337 5718 68 > r-releaseWindowsix86+x86_64 324 70 2203 5931 24 > r-oldrelWindowsix86+x86_64 532 159 1618 6073 170 > > Tablulate on full message: >> res_tbl > $`r-develLinuxx86_64(Debian GCC)` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 261 59 4150 28 3994 35 25 > > $`r-develLinuxx86_64(Fedora Clang)` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 265 66 4179 12 3982 19 29 > > $`r-develLinuxx86_64(Fedora GCC)` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 265 60 4191 13 3972 19 32 > > $`r-develOS Xx86_64(Clang)` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 294 70 4066 9 4068 13 32 > > $`r-develWindowsix86+x86_64` > > ERROR ERROR* NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 295 124 1 3962 25 4064 36 45 > > $`r-patchedLinuxx86_64` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 259 54 4153 28 3998 35 25 > > $`r-patchedSolarissparc` > > ERROR ERROR* NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN WARN* > 364 129 2 4006 76 3839 70 65 1 > > $`r-patchedSolarisx86` > > ERROR ERROR* NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 343 105 1 4062 29 3945 20 47 > > $`r-releaseLinuxx86_64` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 268 54 2578 18 5569 45 20 > > $`r-releaseOS Xx86_64(Mavericks)` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 255 174 2335 2 5716 2 68 > > $`r-releaseWindowsix86+x86_64` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN > 324 70 2187 16 5885 46 24 > > $`r-oldrelWindowsix86+x86_64` > > ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN WARN* > 532 159 1605 13 6028 45 168 2 > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
David Winsemius
2016-Apr-25 21:04 UTC
[R] CRAN package check results tabulated ... wasRe: Number of package in Ubuntu
> On Apr 24, 2016, at 4:51 AM, boB Rudis <bob at rudis.net> wrote: > > Or grab https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results.rds and > read it w/o the need for scraping. >I had not realized there was a repository like that. However, I'm not sure what it means. It's not the same as the package listing on the webpage I referenced, since loading it into R gives a dataframe with more than ten times as many rows. Is there a description of that file somewhere? Does its much larger size indicate that it holds the entire archives file as well as the current CRAN offerings?> str(dfrm)'data.frame': 99497 obs. of 10 variables: $ Flavor : Factor w/ 12 levels "r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... $ Package : chr "A3" "a4Base" "a4Core" "a4Preproc" ... $ Version : chr "1.0.0" NA NA NA ... $ Priority : chr NA NA NA NA ... $ Maintainer: chr "Scott Fortmann-Roe <scottfr at berkeley.edu>" NA NA NA ... $ Status : chr "OK" NA NA NA ... $ Flags : chr "" NA NA NA ... $ T_install : num 0.664 8.491 3.184 4.511 5.063 ... $ T_check : num 14.1 NA NA NA 47.5 ... $ T_total : num 14.79 8.49 3.18 4.51 52.6 ... On the other hand my efforts appear to have unnecessarily duplicated the material that is already obviously displayed in the summary table at the top of that page if one only adds the Note column totals to those of the OK column. <Heel of palm to side of head.> -- David.> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 10:43 AM, David Winsemius > <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: >> >>> On Apr 23, 2016, at 6:56 AM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Apr 22, 2016, at 11:51 AM, mylisttech at gmail.com wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear Experts , >>>> >>>> I am using R with Spark on Windows and now there is a need to move to Ubuntu. I wanted to know if most of the packages that are available on windows , would they be available on Ubuntu/Linux? If not can I compile the source code of those package ? Has any one of you used the packages on Ubuntu ? >>> >>> You can get the status of efforts to compile packages on the various machine avaialbe to CRAN at the CRAN package checks page: >>> >>> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html >>> >> >> After scraping that page with rvest::read_html I then used `table` to summarize. I posted the full output at the end of this but here are the relevant rows for Debian (for the Ubuntu option) and the Windows platforms tested: >> >>> res_tbl >> $`r-develLinuxx86_64(Debian GCC)` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 261 59 4150 28 3994 35 25 >> >> $`r-develWindowsix86+x86_64` >> >> ERROR ERROR* NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 295 124 1 3962 25 4064 36 45 >> >> $`r-patchedLinuxx86_64` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 259 54 4153 28 3998 35 25 >> >> $`r-releaseLinuxx86_64` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 268 54 2578 18 5569 45 20 >> >> $`r-releaseWindowsix86+x86_64` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 324 70 2187 16 5885 46 24 >> >> $`r-oldrelWindowsix86+x86_64` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN WARN* >> 532 159 1605 13 6028 45 168 2 >> >> I think the various "NOTE" and "WARN" categories in most cases should be interpreted as "probably OK". It's those initial <blank>'s and ERROR categories that would most likely be the ones affecting users. >> >> -- >> >> David Winsemius >> Alameda, CA, USA >> >> --------- full tables-------- >> Tabulate on just the first letter of hte result: >> >>> t(res_tbl2) >> blank E N O W >> r-develLinuxx86_64(Debian GCC) 261 59 4178 4029 25 >> r-develLinuxx86_64(Fedora Clang) 265 66 4191 4001 29 >> r-develLinuxx86_64(Fedora GCC) 265 60 4204 3991 32 >> r-develOS Xx86_64(Clang) 294 70 4075 4081 32 >> r-develWindowsix86+x86_64 295 125 3987 4100 45 >> r-patchedLinuxx86_64 259 54 4181 4033 25 >> r-patchedSolarissparc 364 131 4082 3909 66 >> r-patchedSolarisx86 343 106 4091 3965 47 >> r-releaseLinuxx86_64 268 54 2596 5614 20 >> r-releaseOS Xx86_64(Mavericks) 255 174 2337 5718 68 >> r-releaseWindowsix86+x86_64 324 70 2203 5931 24 >> r-oldrelWindowsix86+x86_64 532 159 1618 6073 170 >> >> Tablulate on full message: >>> res_tbl >> $`r-develLinuxx86_64(Debian GCC)` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 261 59 4150 28 3994 35 25 >> >> $`r-develLinuxx86_64(Fedora Clang)` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 265 66 4179 12 3982 19 29 >> >> $`r-develLinuxx86_64(Fedora GCC)` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 265 60 4191 13 3972 19 32 >> >> $`r-develOS Xx86_64(Clang)` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 294 70 4066 9 4068 13 32 >> >> $`r-develWindowsix86+x86_64` >> >> ERROR ERROR* NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 295 124 1 3962 25 4064 36 45 >> >> $`r-patchedLinuxx86_64` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 259 54 4153 28 3998 35 25 >> >> $`r-patchedSolarissparc` >> >> ERROR ERROR* NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN WARN* >> 364 129 2 4006 76 3839 70 65 1 >> >> $`r-patchedSolarisx86` >> >> ERROR ERROR* NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 343 105 1 4062 29 3945 20 47 >> >> $`r-releaseLinuxx86_64` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 268 54 2578 18 5569 45 20 >> >> $`r-releaseOS Xx86_64(Mavericks)` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 255 174 2335 2 5716 2 68 >> >> $`r-releaseWindowsix86+x86_64` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN >> 324 70 2187 16 5885 46 24 >> >> $`r-oldrelWindowsix86+x86_64` >> >> ERROR NOTE NOTE* OK OK* WARN WARN* >> 532 159 1605 13 6028 45 168 2 >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.David Winsemius Alameda, CA, USA