search for: check_1

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "check_1".

Did you mean: check1
2015 May 23
2
[LLVMdev] Alias-based Loop Versioning
...t; <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Ashutosh Nema" <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com>, "Hal > Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 5:45:27 AM > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Alias-based Loop Versioning > > > > > I am not clear what check_1+check_2 really means. For ex: if check_2 > is a subset of check_1 and check_1+check_2 implies union, then the > new check_1+check_2 may be overly conservative resulting in lost > opportunities. > That's correct. However, it is not clear that these opportunities are important in pr...
2015 May 25
0
[LLVMdev] Alias-based Loop Versioning
...t; <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Ashutosh Nema" <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com>, "Hal > Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 5:45:27 AM > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Alias-based Loop Versioning > > > > > I am not clear what check_1+check_2 really means. For ex: if check_2 > is a subset of check_1 and check_1+check_2 implies union, then the > new check_1+check_2 may be overly conservative resulting in lost > opportunities. > That's correct. However, it is not clear that these opportunities are important in pr...
2015 May 28
1
[LLVMdev] Alias-based Loop Versioning
...;, "Ashutosh Nema" <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com>, "Hal >> Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 5:45:27 AM >> Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Alias-based Loop Versioning >> >> >> >> >> I am not clear what check_1+check_2 really means. For ex: if check_2 >> is a subset of check_1 and check_1+check_2 implies union, then the >> new check_1+check_2 may be overly conservative resulting in lost >> opportunities. >> > > That's correct. However, it is not clear that these opportu...
2015 May 21
3
[LLVMdev] Alias-based Loop Versioning
There is a work taking place by multiple people in this area and more is expected to happen and I’d like to make sure we’re working toward a common end goal. I tried to collect the use-cases for run-time memory checks and the specific memchecks required for each: 1. Loop Vectorizer: each memory access is checked against all other memory accesses in the loop (except read vs read) 2. Loop
2012 Mar 21
2
Check results between two data.frame
...large (400*100 roughly), so I would like to create a matrix to identify which ones are not same in the two dataframes. So I added 'CHECK_XY' in my code but when I run it, I got 'Error in CHECK_XY[i, j] = c("good") : subscript out of bounds'. Could anyone help please?? CHECK_1<- function (x = "file1", y = "file2") { NROW <- nrow(x) NCOL <- ncol(x) CHECK_XY <- as.matrix(NA, NROW, NCOL) for (i in 1:nrow(x)) { for (j in 1:ncol(x)) { if (x[i, j] == y[i, j]) { CHECK_XY[i, j] = c("good&quo...
2015 Feb 25
0
4.1.17 compile error on AIX
...py_3.o,strsep_3.o,strupr_3.o,strpool_3.o,estrdup_3.o,erealloc_3.o,simple_exec_3.o,strcollect_3.o,rtbl_3.o,rand_3.o,cloexec_3.o,xfree_3.o,replace_3.o,closefrom_3.o,resolve_3.o,socket_3.o,roken_gethostby_3.o,strerror_r_3.o -> libroken-samba4.so} -> task failed (err #1): {task: cc_link check_1.o,error_1.o,tdb_1.o,traverse_1.o,freelistcheck_1.o,lock_1.o,dump_1.o,freelist_1.o,io_1.o,open_1.o,transaction_1.o,hash_1.o,summary_1.o,rescue_1.o -> libtdb.so} -> task failed (err #1): {task: cc_link check_1.o,free_1.o,hash_1.o,io_1.o,lock_1.o,open_1.o,summary_1.o,ntdb_1.o,transacti...
2014 Dec 11
0
Compilation Error during make
...py_3.o,strsep_3.o,strupr_3.o,strpool_3.o,estrdup_3.o,erealloc_3.o,simple_exec_3.o,strcollect_3.o,rtbl_3.o,rand_3.o,cloexec_3.o,xfree_3.o,replace_3.o,closefrom_3.o,resolve_3.o,socket_3.o,roken_gethostby_3.o,strerror_r_3.o -> libroken-samba4.so} -> task failed (err #1): {task: cc_link check_1.o,error_1.o,tdb_1.o,traverse_1.o,freelistcheck_1.o,lock_1.o,dump_1.o,freelist_1.o,io_1.o,open_1.o,transaction_1.o,hash_1.o,summary_1.o,rescue_1.o -> libtdb.so} make: The error code from the last command is 1. Stop. -Lester
2012 Aug 29
0
Problem building samba 4.0.0beta7 on Solaris 10
...t status Waf: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/samba-4.0.0beta7/bin' Build failed: -> task failed (err #1): {task: cc_link ntdbtorture_3.o,ilog_2.o,hash_1.o,replace_2.o,timegm_2.o,snprintf_2.o,strptime_2.o,getpass_2.o,getifaddrs_2.o,xattr_2.o,debug_4.o,str_4.o,tally_5.o,likely_10.o,check_1.o,free_1.o,hash_1.o,io_1.o,lock_1.o,open_1.o,summary_1.o,ntdb_1.o,transaction_1.o,traverse_1.o -> ntdbtorture} I had submitted a bug report (Bug ID 9064) which was against beta4, but I've updated it with the above information. I'd be grateful either for a full fix or pointers to what t...