search for: check1

...s to me. This is what I get with kernel.geom.mirror.debug=2: ata2-master: pio=PIO4 wdma=WDMA2 udma=UDMA133 cable=40 wire ad4: 476940MB <SAMSUNG HD501LJ CR100-13> at ata2-master SATA300 ad4: 976773168 sectors [969021C/16H/63S] 16 sectors/interrupt 1 depth queue GEOM: new disk ad4 ad4: nVidia check1 failed ad4: Adaptec check1 failed ad4: LSI (v3) check1 failed GEOM_MIRROR[2]: Tasting ad4. ad4: LSI (v2) check1 failed magic: GEOM::MIRROR version: 4 name: gm0 mid: 2403671335 did: 1321347210 all: 2 genid: 0 syncid: 1 priority: 0 slice: 4096 bal...

...to do so when the second nest check was before the hatch date (incubation), or when the first nest check was after the hatch date (brood-rearing). But I can't figure out a quick way to split the interval when it contained both incubation and brood-rearing activities. I'd like to go from: Check1 Check2 HatchDate 101 121 110 to: Check1 Check2 HatchDate Stage 101 109 110 I 110 121 110 B because even though the nest wasn't actually checked on the day of hatching, we know that it tra...

Dear list, I have a question I'm trying to use the following command in R, but it gives me an error message.The command is: data<-ddply(data,c("year","name"), transform, check1=ifelse(check1==1 & check2==1, 1,NULL)) so in my data frame I already have the check1 variable, if the conditions (check1==1 & check2==1) is respected, check has to have 1 as value, whereas if it is not I want that variable to maintain its value. Anyone knows, how to do this, by doing th...

...1, ck2, ck3) : object 'ck1' not found", in one of the iterations and stop.  Since I am not experienced in programming, can anyone give me a suggestion to inspect this error? The followings are the functions I created : ################### # functions in the convg # ################### check1 <- function(sumgt,beta1.0,gamma.0,sigma.0){    if (any(!is.finite(sumgt))){        count1 <- count1+1        return(c(count1,beta1.0,gamma.0,sigma.0))    }   else {return(c(NaN,NaN,NaN,NaN))}  } check2 <- function(v0,maxit,iter,beta1.0,gamma.0,sigma.0){     if (is.nan(sum(v0))==TRUE | any(...

I have specified path for 'username map' in smb.conf. I have a single entry in smb.conf: brajesh_01:~ # cat $mapfile root = SFSDEV\administrator brajesh_01:~ # I have a share 'share1' on file system fs1 which is exported to the Windows users. When I create a folder 'check1' inside the share share1, then user and group permission is properly assigned to the mapped user 'root' as expected. Please see here: brajesh_01:~ # ls -l /vx/fs2/ total 0 drwxrwxr-x+ 2 root root 96 2010-01-14 06:55 check1 brajesh_01:~ # If I delete the mapping and create another...

...hich you could reuse as another pattern. Something like (syntax TBD): > > CHECK<NAME>: mov [[REG:r[0-9]+]], #42 > CHECK-NOT: <NAME> I.e. without adding a new optinons for FileCheck, something like the following? # RUN: llvm-sometool --print-string | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK1 # RUN: llvm-sometool --no-print-string | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK2 CHECK1<NAME>: mov [[REG:r[0-9]+]], #42 CHECK2-NOT: <NAME> It might work probably. We already have the ability to name parts of the output checked: // CHECK: Dynamic Relocations { // CHECK-NEXT: {{.*}}...

....age), cal.fun = "raking") # Warning message: # In regcalibrate.survey.design2(design, formula, population, aggregate.stage # = aggregate.stage, :Sample and population totals have different names. # check weights--M and F seem reversed when "calibrate" used library(reshape2) check1 <- with(rake.svy, cbind(variables, weight = 1/prob)) dcast(check1, Gender~Age, sum, value.var = "weight", margins = TRUE) check2 <- with(cal.svy, cbind(variables, weight = 1/prob)) dcast(check2, Gender~Age, sum, value.var = "weight", margins = TRUE)

It’s a good thought in general Adam, but I worried about following scenarios: 1) As Dibyendu already mentioned Check1 + Check2 is not very clear. If your intent is superset/union of check1 & check2 then I’m not sure it will always help passes those needs smaller checks (i.e. loop distribution) Every pass has a different need of runtime check, i.e. vectorizer checks each memory against all others except (rea...

...version once and keep amending the checking block: checks_1+checks_2.) Adam > On May 24, 2015, at 9:35 PM, Nema, Ashutosh <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com> wrote: > > It’s a good thought in general Adam, but I worried about following scenarios: > > 1) As Dibyendu already mentioned Check1 + Check2 is not very clear. If your intent is superset/union > of check1 & check2 then I’m not sure it will always help passes those needs smaller checks (i.e. loop distribution) > > Every pass has a different need of runtime check, i.e. vectorizer checks each memory against all othe...

...TBD): > > > > > > CHECK<NAME>: mov [[REG:r[0-9]+]], #42 > > > CHECK-NOT: <NAME> > > > > I.e. without adding a new optinons for FileCheck, something like the > following? > > # RUN: llvm-sometool --print-string | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK1 > > # RUN: llvm-sometool --no-print-string | FileCheck %s --check-prefix= > CHECK2 > > > > CHECK1<NAME>: mov [[REG:r[0-9]+]], #42 > > CHECK2-NOT: <NAME> > > > > It might work probably. We already have the ability to name parts of > > the out...

Dear all, I'm looking for primary help at aggregating table() results and at writing a loop (if useful) My dataset ( http://goo.gl/gEPKW ) is composed of 23k rows, each one representing a point in the space of which we know the land cover over 10 years (column y01 to y10). I need to analyse it with a temporal sliding window of 5 years (y01 to y05, y02 to y06 and so forth) For each period

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dibyendu Das" <Dibyendu.Das at amd.com> > To: "Adam Nemet" <anemet at apple.com>, "Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Ashutosh Nema" <Ashutosh.Nema at amd.com>, "Hal > Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 5:45:27 AM > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev]

Hello, I've just spent several hours going over several Google searches trying to find a way to configure rsync to log into a file named "/var/log/rsync.log". So far, every instance where I've found someone asking about rsync logging remained unanswered (which is kind of weird in itself). As far as I can tell, the only way to do this is to setup rsync as a daemon process so

Hi all, There have been a few cases recently where I've noticed two test cases in the same lit test that do the same thing except invert the CHECK, to show that something is NOT present. I'm talking about something like the following: # RUN: llvm-sometool --print-string | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=STRING # RUN: llvm-sometool --no-print-string | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-STRING #

Hi, I've made a selfStart function for use with gnls and the following piece of code works nicely: check1 <- gnls(y ~ spot.shape.fct(xcord, ycord, background, spotintensity, rho, sigma, delta, mux, muy), start=getInitial(y ~ spot.shape.fct(xcord, ycord, background, spotintensity, rho,...

...1f0 altiobase=0x03f6 bmaddr=0xffa0 ata0: mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat2=50 ata0-master: ATAPI 00 00 ata0-slave: ATAPI 14 eb ata0: mask=03 stat0=50 stat1=10 ata0-master: ATA 01 a5 ata0: devices=09 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ... ad0: success setting UDMA2 on Intel chip Creating DISK ad0 ar: FreeBSD check1 failed ad0: <Maxtor 4D040H2/DAH017K0> ATA-6 disk at ata0-master ad0: 38146MB (78125000 sectors), 77504 C, 16 H, 63 S, 512 B ad0: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, UDMA33 ad0: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=5 cblid=1 My question is, why did the kernel set UDMA33 mode instead of UDMA66 mode? Yes, I h...

...01e1f3f 0..30=31 cylinders, 0..31=32 heads, 1..63=63 sectors 0 accounted for Device configuration finished. bpf: lo0 attached bpf: ppp0 attached new masks: bio 68d000, tty 630492, net 670c92 bpf: sl0 attached bpf: faith0 attached ad0: success setting UDMA5 on VIA chip Creating DISK ad0 ar: FreeBSD check1 failed ad0: <MAXTOR 6L080L4/A93.0500> ATA-5 disk at ata0-master ad0: 76345MB (156355584 sectors), 155114 C, 16 H, 63 S, 512 B ad0: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, UDMA100 ad0: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=6 cblid=1 ad2: success setting PIO1 on generic chip Creating DISK ad2 ar: FreeBSD check1 fai...

Thomas, Have spoken to Soren, from my bootlog he believes that the problem is in atapicam causing the system to lock up. He is happy to answer some questions but doesnt have time to delve into atapicam himself. Did you author atapicam, I have seen your name on the sourcecode, can you help me further? Whats next? Thanks Adam. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was

...ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A isa_probe_children: probing PnP devices BIOS Geometries: 0:03fffe3f 0..1023=1024 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors 0 accounted for Device configuration finished. bpf: lo0 attached ad0: success setting UDMA5 on Intel chip Creating DISK ad0 ar: FreeBSD check1 failed ad0: <WDC WD1600BB-00DAA3/75.13B75> ATA-6 disk at ata0-master ad0: 152627MB (312581808 sectors), 310101 C, 16 H, 63 S, 512 B ad0: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, UDMA100 ad0: piomode=4 dmamode=2 udmamode=5 cblid=1 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ad0s1: type 0xa5, start 0, end = 31258180...

...nters tick every 1.000 msec lo0: bpf attached rr232x: no controller detected. ata2-master: pio=PIO4 wdma=WDMA2 udma=UDMA133 cable=40 wire ad4: 152627MB <WDC WD1600JD-00HBB0 08.02D08> at ata2-master SATA150 ad4: 312581808 sectors [310101C/16H/63S] 16 sectors/interrupt 1 depth queue ad4: nVidia check1 failed ad4: Adaptec check1 failed ad4: LSI (v3) check1 failed ad4: LSI (v2) check1 failed ad4: FreeBSD check1 failed ATA PseudoRAID loaded GEOM: new disk ad4 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a start_init: trying /sbin/init -------------- next part -------------- -------------- next part ---...