Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "celunit".
Did you mean:
celunite
2007 Jan 22
0
[LLVMdev] more llvmgcc build issues.
...153 "/usr/include/signal.h" 3 4
void
psignal (signo, message)
unsigned signo;
char *message;
I see that there is a patch for this here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01359.html
Should be simple enough to commit ?
--
cheers
Ramana
Ramana Radhakrishnan
GNU Tools
Celunite Inc (www.celunite.com)
3rd Floor, Business Avenue
Lane 6 North Main Road
Koregaon Park
Pune 411001
Phone (work) - +912026051367
(mobile) - +919890040009
2007 Jan 24
2
[LLVMdev] patch - update libiberty/psignal to latest prototypes.
.../strsignal.c (revision 254)
+++ libiberty/strsignal.c (working copy)
@@ -557,8 +557,8 @@
void
psignal (signo, message)
- unsigned signo;
- char *message;
+ int signo;
+ const char *message;
{
if (signal_names == NULL)
{
--
cheers
Ramana
Ramana Radhakrishnan
GNU Tools
Celunite Inc (www.celunite.com)
2007 Apr 12
3
[LLVMdev] Compiler Name
Suggestions:
Zembla - It's a fictional northern European country in "Pale Fire"
by Nabokov.
Pala - The island utopia in Aldos Huxley's "Island".
Thra - The world of The Dark Crystal.
-bw
2007 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] Compiler Name
Invictus - unconquerable, and Invictus.org doesn't appear to exist.
On Apr 12, 2007, at 1:34 AM, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Suggestions:
>
> Zembla - It's a fictional northern European country in "Pale Fire"
> by Nabokov.
> Pala - The island utopia in Aldos Huxley's "Island".
> Thra - The world of The Dark Crystal.
>
> -bw
>
2007 Jan 21
1
[LLVMdev] problems with llc and hello world .
Hi ,
I've been giving the ARM port of LLVM a spin today and ran into this .
[ramana at venglathur builddir]$ cat hello.c && llvm-gcc hello.c -c
-emit-llvm -O3 -o - | llc -march=arm
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
printf ("hello world\n");
return 0;
}
llc: bytecode didn't read correctly.
llvm and the tools is today's CVS head while
llvm-gcc is
2007 Jan 24
1
[LLVMdev] patch - update libiberty/psignal to latest prototypes.
Devang,
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 10:28 -0800, Devang Patel wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2007, at 4:14 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
> > Hi ,
> >
> > I needed to apply this patch to get the GCC frontend building on an
> > FC5
> > x86 box .
>
> I am curious, what kind of failure are you seeing ?
I should have mentioned in the email : Here's my earlier post