search for: celunite

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "celunite".

2007 Jan 22
0
[LLVMdev] more llvmgcc build issues.
...153 "/usr/include/signal.h" 3 4 void psignal (signo, message) unsigned signo; char *message; I see that there is a patch for this here. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01359.html Should be simple enough to commit ? -- cheers Ramana Ramana Radhakrishnan GNU Tools Celunite Inc (www.celunite.com) 3rd Floor, Business Avenue Lane 6 North Main Road Koregaon Park Pune 411001 Phone (work) - +912026051367 (mobile) - +919890040009
2007 Jan 24
2
[LLVMdev] patch - update libiberty/psignal to latest prototypes.
.../strsignal.c (revision 254) +++ libiberty/strsignal.c (working copy) @@ -557,8 +557,8 @@ void psignal (signo, message) - unsigned signo; - char *message; + int signo; + const char *message; { if (signal_names == NULL) { -- cheers Ramana Ramana Radhakrishnan GNU Tools Celunite Inc (www.celunite.com)
2007 Apr 12
3
[LLVMdev] Compiler Name
Suggestions: Zembla - It's a fictional northern European country in "Pale Fire" by Nabokov. Pala - The island utopia in Aldos Huxley's "Island". Thra - The world of The Dark Crystal. -bw
2007 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] Compiler Name
Invictus - unconquerable, and Invictus.org doesn't appear to exist. On Apr 12, 2007, at 1:34 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: > Suggestions: > > Zembla - It's a fictional northern European country in "Pale Fire" > by Nabokov. > Pala - The island utopia in Aldos Huxley's "Island". > Thra - The world of The Dark Crystal. > > -bw >
2007 Jan 21
1
[LLVMdev] problems with llc and hello world .
Hi , I've been giving the ARM port of LLVM a spin today and ran into this . [ramana at venglathur builddir]$ cat hello.c && llvm-gcc hello.c -c -emit-llvm -O3 -o - | llc -march=arm #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { printf ("hello world\n"); return 0; } llc: bytecode didn't read correctly. llvm and the tools is today's CVS head while llvm-gcc is
2007 Jan 24
1
[LLVMdev] patch - update libiberty/psignal to latest prototypes.
Devang, On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 10:28 -0800, Devang Patel wrote: > On Jan 24, 2007, at 4:14 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > > > Hi , > > > > I needed to apply this patch to get the GCC frontend building on an > > FC5 > > x86 box . > > I am curious, what kind of failure are you seeing ? I should have mentioned in the email : Here's my earlier post