search for: celerons

Hi Phil Here it is: [root at totorbex ~]# lspci -nn .00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series SoC Transaction Register [8086:2280] (rev 21) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:22b1] (rev 21) 00:10.0 SD Host controller

On 29/03/2020 14:31, Patrick DERWAEL wrote: > Hi Phil > > Here it is: > > > [root at totorbex ~]# lspci -nn > .00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium > Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series SoC Transaction Register [8086:2280] > (rev 21) > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation > Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor

Hey all, I''m thinking about moving my 2.0.7 install over to 3.0.0 for eventual use in a production environment. Two questions: 1) Do people think 3.0.0 is ready for production - or is it just a testing/unstable playpen? 2) What do I have to change - just the xen-2.0.7.gz for do I have to recompile the dom0/domU kernels too? Cheers, Matthew Walster

Hi all, i'm going to install asterisk with a 4 BRI (HFC chipset) on a Celeron at 2.6 GHz I don't known Celeron performance, but i listen that is not very good. Could I have some performance isuue with this kind of processor ? Thanks for all Giordano -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I am interested in the thoughts of the people who know the architecture of Asterisk quite well.. What I am interested in is the performace difference of Celeron vs P4 vs Xeon.. I know Intel marketing says that servers should be Xeon, Workstations should be P4 and desktops should be Celeron and they are priced to the specific target market.. I am on a tight budget and so I am looking for the

(a) Mark (mhr) suggested I buy a bare bones box, when I reported the problem with the mainboard in this Dell Dimension 2400 box. Possibly I can have the mainboard repaired (and the PSU, if it is also having problems), and if so, I will give this one to my Stepson and go the bare bones box route and have a more powerful box for myself. I looked at two (2) very low end Desktop mainboards in the

Hi Leon, I don't have the infra (nor the knowledge or expertise) to create a LiveCD I didn't think about Fedora. This is indeed a good pointer, I will definitely try that Actually, I'm not too worried about the basics, but rather about the wifi, audio & video drivers (one of the boxes is a multimedia system) Thanks!

> Could you please try with a Debian kernel image There is one? I do not find it in either etch or sid (or on Alioth). Do I have to recompile a kernel?

I'm looking to switch to Mac platform. Anyone had any experience with that? I'm expecting on a power G4 laptop later this week.... hope R behaves... -- dok

I have a small network with a Linux machine (named CONTEC) and a XP machine (named CELERON) If issue the command smbclient -L localhost -N Domain=[CONTEC] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.2-7.FC1] Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- homes Disk Home Directories Aurat Disk Copia directory HP IPC$

Can't find any recommended system specs on the website. What are they? Will it run well on a Celeron 1GHz? How about a 700Mhz? I'm asking because the company I'm hosting through is running a special on 700Mhz and 1Ghz servers, and if Icecast will run on these, I may just go ahead and lease 4-5 more to move my icecast stuff onto dedicated servers.

Hello, I'm doing bootstrap in R 2.4.1 in order to compute standard errors of an estimator. I'm running the same program on 4 computers. The core of the program is a nlm minimization of a function, which is (I believe) nicely coded using (t)apply and all the vectorized stuff. I'm slightly puzzled by the differences in the speed of computation. The program works twice as fast on a

Hello, I''ve setuped an ethernet bridge on a debian sarge 3.1 with l7-filter + ipp2 shapper rules The server is a supermicro p4sci + celeron pentium 4 base 3ghz + 512Mb + 2 ethernet e1000 One interface is connected to a cisco catalyst switch The other interface is connected directly to a CMTS (a sort of router for cable modem) configured as bridge too. More than 20Mbps of bandwith

Hi everyone, I am having problems with "oopses" since I introduced HTB on my company''s PC-based routers. It seems that only routers with high network load are affected. The average network load on the two most problematic routers are 10Mbps in/out and 2.5Mbps in/out. The other machines with less than 1Mbps average traffic seems unaffected. We have been getting oopses on

In Timo's thread about RAM today, I noticed dmidecode and I got the data for my Dell Dimension 2400 (Celeron CPU) box, which is below. I won this box in a raffle, during February 2005. After I got the box, I got conflicting information, from Crucial.com and from Dell Latin America, regarding the maximum RAM configuration. To be conservative, I bought two 256 MB DIMMS from Crucial.com, early

I believe I have some hardware or configuration related performance issues running samba 3.0.14a-3sarge. Our server is an Intel Celeron 2 Ghz with 512 MB of RAM and a 3ware card using SATA disks in a RAID 5 configuration (3ware controller card). We have a gigabit network and are using Intel Gigabit ethernet cards e1000). When copying large files to the samba shares on the system, the

̨ʤÏòÄãÎʺÃ! ÎÒ¹«Ë¾³¤ÆÚ´Óʹú¼ÊóÒ×,ΪÍÚ¾òÊг¡Ç±Á¦¡¢À©´ó¾­Óª¹æÄ£,ÒâÔÚ¹óµØ Ñ°ÕÒÁôÒ×´°¿Ú,Ìؽ«´Ë¼Ûͬ±í³Ê¹óµ¥Î»²Î¿¼.ÎÒ˾ÌṩһÁ÷Æ·ÖÊ,Ò»Á÷·þÎñ,ËÍ»õÉÏÃÅ, »õµ½¸¶¿î, ÅúÁí¾ù¿É.»¶Ó­¸÷½çÅóÓÑÀ´µç´¹Ñ¯¼°Ö§³Ö.¶àл!!! ̨ʤ¹«Ë¾ ÖйúITóÒײ¿ :ÇØ Áú ͼ ÇëÎðÖ±½Ó»Ø¸´£¬ÓÐÒâÕßÇëÀ´µç ------0139-59726696 Ò»:±Ê¼Ç±¾µçÄÔ(È«ÇòÁª±£µ¥,ÈýÄê) ±Ê¼Ç±¾µçÄÔÊÖ»úÉÏÍøרÓÃPC¿¨----------1450Ôª A . Ë÷Äá SONY SR/27K(4500Ôª)

̨ÕýÏòÄãÎʺÃ! ÎÒ¹«Ë¾³¤ÆÚ´Óʹú¼ÊóÒ×,ΪÍÚ¾òÊг¡Ç±Á¦¡¢À©´ó¾­Óª¹æÄ£,ÒâÔÚ¹óµØ Ñ°ÕÒÁôÒ×´°¿Ú,Ìؽ«´Ë¼Ûͬ±í³Ê¹óµ¥Î»²Î¿¼.ÎÒ˾ÌṩһÁ÷Æ·ÖÊ,Ò»Á÷·þÎñ,ËÍ»õÉÏÃÅ, »õµ½¸¶¿î, ÅúÁí¾ù¿É.»¶Ó­¸÷½çÅóÓÑÀ´µç´¹Ñ¯¼°Ö§³Ö.¶àл!!! ̨ÍåÕýÈÙ¹ú¼ÊóÒ×¹«Ë¾ ÖйúITóÒײ¿ :Áø½ðÃú ÇëÎðÖ±½Ó»Ø¸´£¬ÓÐÒâÕßÇëÀ´µç ------0138-50738839 Ò».µçÄÔÅä¼þ(RMB.Ôª): A:Ö÷°å: ΢ÐÇ 845Pro2-LE(Socket,i845,SDRAM,AC97Éù¿¨)---530 845Pro

From RHEL docs: "The default implementation of LUKS in Red Hat Enterprise Linux is AES 128 with a SHA256 hashing. Ciphers that are available are: AES - Advanced Encryption Standard - FIPS PUB 197 Twofish (A 128-bit Block Cipher) Serpent cast5 - RFC 2144 cast6 - RFC 2612" My question is: What will be the performance impact on my Celeron 1.73 GHz CPU and/or hdd

Here's the story so far. I had a problem serving a printer from samba 2.2.3-6 (the -6 is specific to Debian I think) to a Windows XP client and found reports of Signal 11 in samba's logfile, so I filed a bug report (Debian Bug#135115) and also sent the log etc to samba@samba.org. The problem is now cured and I can print again, following changes I made to both the client and server.