From RHEL docs: "The default implementation of LUKS in Red Hat Enterprise Linux is AES 128 with a SHA256 hashing. Ciphers that are available are: AES - Advanced Encryption Standard - FIPS PUB 197 Twofish (A 128-bit Block Cipher) Serpent cast5 - RFC 2144 cast6 - RFC 2612" My question is: What will be the performance impact on my Celeron 1.73 GHz CPU and/or hdd speed? -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
Ljubomir Ljubojevic <office at plnet.rs> wrote:> What will be the performance impact on my Celeron 1.73 GHz CPU and/or > hdd speed?Well, the usual "it depends on your [exact] environment" is the real answer. However from a subjective perspective I've found that the only time that I've really noticed a performance impact is during lots of I/O, such as a *large* tarball extraction. (Presumably writing a large file would be similar.) Eclipse, for example, touches a huge amount of files but encryption on the underyling filesystem is not generally noticable. It can be more noticable on a single core, single thread CPU. If you have a server doing significant continuous I/O, probably benchmarking is the only reasonable way to tell. Devin -- There's too much blood in my caffeine system.
Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:> From RHEL docs: > "The default implementation of LUKS in Red Hat Enterprise Linux is AES > 128 with a SHA256 hashing. Ciphers that are available are: > > AES - Advanced Encryption Standard - FIPS PUB 197 > Twofish (A 128-bit Block Cipher) > Serpent > cast5 - RFC 2144 > cast6 - RFC 2612" > > My question is: > What will be the performance impact on my Celeron 1.73 GHz CPU and/or > hdd speed? >I can't give any numbers, but I've been using luks for years now and while it sure adds a performance hit I don't find it really noticeable (especially on latest cpus) during normal use (web browsing, emails, films, office etc). Think of it this way, that laptop is already slow, at least now it will be secure. :-)
On 01/07/2012 06:40 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:> What will be the performance impact on my Celeron 1.73 GHz CPU and/or > hdd speed?To further add to what has been said, check if your particular CPU supports the AES-NI instruction set which should provide some performance boost: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES_instruction_set Of course, that is, if you choose to use the AES cipher (the default). HTH, Jorge
Reasonably Related Threads
- Samba shows error NT Status: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND when copying 10GB file using robocopy when ecryptfs file system shared using samba
- [LLVMdev] Compiler name: Nāga
- HooDaHek 0.6 Released
- [PATCH v8 00/11] x86: PIE support to extend KASLR randomization
- [PATCH v8 00/11] x86: PIE support to extend KASLR randomization