search for: cdevidal

> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris de Vidal [mailto:cdevidal@yahoo.com] > --- "Bradley W. Langhorst" <brad@langhorst.com> wrote: > > the oplock problem with access databases is well > > known... > > I don't think samba alone can fix it. > > (somebody prove me wrong :) > > Samba alone probably cannot fix...

Oops, samba@lists.samba.org, not SALBA (: /dev/idal --- Chris de Vidal <cdevidal@yahoo.com> wrote: > Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:19:56 -0800 (PST) > From: Chris de Vidal <cdevidal@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: oplock problems > To: Brian Johnson <bjohnson@jecinc.on.ca> > CC: salba@lists.samba.org > > --- Brian Johnson <bjohnson@jecinc.on.ca>...

It makes it work! I was reading through the other messages on the list with similar subjects, and found this one: -----Original Message----- From: Matthias Rutzki [mailto:mrutzki@gmx.de] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:51 AM To: david.boynton2@asu.edu; bgmilne@cae.co.za; cdevidal@yahoo.com Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] domain users in local groups with Winbind/Samba/Redhat It was a long message, so I won't quote it again, but if you read back, you'll find this message. I just decided I'd try his pam setup and it worked after I added the likeauth o...

Hi, I'm trying to setup samba server on FreeBSD-4.7-STABLE, with samba version 2.2.7a. It runs so good (better than our snap server :). I need to know if should be possible, that users can modify, save, and all other possible operations on files except delete it. My users config are, more or less: All users have their uid All users are in same gid Some project admins (they are on

Does anybody know more about groups? I am considering switching from NT to Samba domain and have made some test. Unfortunately I need to make two additional groups, except Domain Admin (one of them is Domain Users). Is it possible to make that with the stable version of Samba? And another, but not so important (for now) question. Currently I have a Samba server, providing files and printers

This is more of a pam question then a samba question, but I thought I'd start here and see if I can get an answer. I've gotten pam_winbind.so working with gdm (on RHAT 8) using the following /etc/pam.d/gdm file. I've put + signs to show the lines I added I added to the stock RHAT 8 gdm pam def.: #%PAM-1.0 + auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so + auth

My RedHat 8.0 workstation doesn't want to play nice with Winbind. The rest of our Samba servers (on RedHat 7.3) are working fine, and I am familiar with setting up Winbind. Samba: 2.2.7a (RPM from Samba.org. RedHat's RPMs do same thing.) Kernel 2.4.20 NT 4 domain I'd copied the pam and smb.conf from a working box in testing. Getent passwd and group works, BUT getent group

Hello, I'm installing 2.2.7a, or attempting to at any rate. I've compiled it from source using the following instructions: http://us2.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html Anyways, I've got it set up so that it works. Now I'm trying to get to a point where I can interface it like I have with a different Linux box that is working without any problems. When I did the

Hi, I've been trying to get SSH tunnelling working with Samba. I'm using a Windows XP and a RedHat 8.0 box. I've closely followed the instructions from the HOWTO manual in order to set this up to no avail. I think the problem comes from the fact that my lmhosts file has no effect on the NetBIOS name cache when I preload it with the command 'nbtstat -R'. I checked the

Hi all, Hoping someone might be able to steer me in the right direction and/or help me solve my problem. We have a number of Linux servers (RH6.2 -> RH8) which connect to the same share on a Win2000 Server. We've been working kinda hard to get everything upgraded to either RH7.3 or RH8.0 since we rarely get the opportunity. 2 similar servers (one dev, one prod) access this same window

Before you read this, I want to state (for reasons listed below) that I don't expect an answer (advice is welcomed, but please read this email carefully before answering). I'm sharing this with the community with the hope that better software results from our sad experience... BACKGROUND I've been using NT for 4 years, Netware and Linux for 3 years, and Samba for almost 2. I work

--- "Bradley W. Langhorst" <brad@langhorst.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:43, Chris de Vidal wrote: > > If preventing file corruption is a "drop > everything - > > priority 1 bug" (quoting Jeremy), it should either > be > > documented and/or disabled by default. But if > > performance takes priority over file corruption, > at

I'm sorry I gave the appearance I was slamming you. The tone was supposed to be "Please, help yourself first, here's why... here's ALL of the resources I use to help myself." I've successfully been able to keep questions about Samba to this list down to a minimum by first consulting all of my sources and perhaps you can, too. As I read it again, it had the appearance

--- Shane Kennedy <skenn@indigo.ie> wrote: > Basically, the application freezes in patches, and > eventually, app > hangs. With 8 users accessing 2 identical shares > (I duplicated the iso, > mount both of them, and share both), at least 2 of > them are likely to > have hung within 5 minutes. I'm not sure this would even work well in Windows. CDs make poor

Ohh, hmm. I'll try it at work if I get some time and see what happens. I have a Samba benchmark I can run against one of our unused servers, and I'll try to have 16 "users" access the same iso copied and mounted twice, just as you're doing. I might not get time to do this next week, so in the mean time, a good troubleshooting technique is to strip any as many smb.conf

I've been reading this list for a few weeks now and I've given advice on questions that look challenging but I've deleted MANY questions like these: "How do I (easy question found in the documents)?" Though I don't count myself an expert, I've known enough experts to see that they _HATE_ it when you don't invest some time before asking a question. I too have