search for: cc'ed

incoming-centos at rjl.com wrote: > On 04/27/2018 07:55 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Does anyone know if it's even possible to NOT cc myself when I hit reply >> all? >> >> Geez, that's what's in the sent folder.... > > Check your settings for account setting->copies & folders->cc these > email addresses > > When I do a "reply all" I do not get cc'ed. > Just did,...

(Sorry for CC'ing piles of people, but didn't want folks to miss this in the mailing list churn.) See the subject. The problem is in the target-independent code generator and especially in the x86 backend. I would like to fix it. This will be a mechanical change just organizing code in a way that makes...

Hello all, In https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq0q1hfzidg, Adam Nemet (cc'ed) describes optimization remarks and some future plans for the project. I had a few follow-up questions: 1. As an example of future work to be done, the talk mentions expanding the set of optimization passes that emit remarks. However, the Clang User Manual mentions that "optimization r...

...t main(int argc, char** argv) { 20 RemotePtr a(A); 21 RemotePtr b(B); 22 23 #pragma unroll 4 24 for(int i=0; i<4; ++i) { 25 a.at(i) += b.at(i); 26 } 27 28 return 0; 29 } It's given that pointer a, in each object of the class RemotePtr, is the only pointer that can access the array pointed by it. So, I tried __remote int* __restrict a; (line 9) construct to tell Clang the same. This doesn't seem to work and I see no noliass in the generated IR. Specifically, I want lines 23-26 optimized assuming no aliasing between A and B. Any reason why Clang shouldn't...

Hi David, > Any word on this making 3.0? 3.0 already branched, and since this is not a regression, this will most probably go into 3.1. Maybe Bill (CC'ed) being the release manager has other opinion on this. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Hi team, I have uploaded a new package for blktap-utils on mentors.d.n [1] that resolves two bugs. One of them is RC [2] and was reported by me yesterday. I have CC'ed debian-backports list also because bug [2] affects users that use backported kernels in wheezy and use blktap-utils. Changes since the last upload: * Fix failing to call io_setup with EINVAL (Closes: #760504). * Add uuid-dev dependency in blktap-dev package (Closes: #738720). * A...

incoming-centos at rjl.com wrote: > Is the folder that you have selected inside of an account whose email > address is exactly the same as the one that get's cc'ed?? I could see > where if the messages were forwarded to a different email account, it > would do this. If this is not the case, go into > edit->preferences->advanced-config->config editor (like th...

Hi, Does anyone know why this (https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-September/117814.html <https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-September/117814.html>) change might be failing Herald’s pre-merge check on Windows? CC’ed River since he is the last person to touch the line with the error. Best, —Daniel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200529/b6d9e3f0/attachment.html>

Unfortunately https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-loop-parallel-accesses-metadata is not a solution here. A loop-parallel access does not imply non-aliasing. The obvious case is when only reading from a location, but even when a location is written to I'd be careful to deduce that they do not alias since it might be a "benign data race" or the value n...

...t;> > >> The current limit is set at 10 for llvm-commits. It sounds like that > is too > >> low. > >> > >> Does anyone that uses Phabricator have an idea of how much to increase > this > >> limit? Would 20 suffice, or are more people than that CC'ed on > Phabricator > >> emails? > > > > I'm not exactly sure why Phab should need a higher limit. I've seen a > > few Phab emails come through with a list as long as my arm - but I > > don't know why that happens. Anyone know where those are comi...

Apologies: didn't notice how old this thread is before replying. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > [+CC Matthias, Quentin] > > Inter-procedural register allocation can be a big win, but my estimate > is that it will be challenging to complete within one summer unless > you're already familiar with LLVM's register allocator. > > I've CC'ed some people who can give you...

...irt is not really ovirt's people concern. > > The thing is qemu can do ceph rbd in EL7, libvirt does not, > although support seems to be there and a simple rebuild enables > it. Was hoping you guys know more. > > Lucian I'd suggest to ask this on the virt-sig of centOS (cc'ed). Why is there no rbd support in el7 libvirt? I don't know, maybe the virt repo guys from centos can rebuild it (they already do rebuild libvirt afaik, another flag might not hurt them ). HTH - -- Mit freundlichen Gr??en / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Servic...

Hi Vivek, [+CC Matthias, Quentin] Inter-procedural register allocation can be a big win, but my estimate is that it will be challenging to complete within one summer unless you're already familiar with LLVM's register allocator. I've CC'ed some people who can give you some more detailed informat...

In message <19991122110826.A23851 at wdawson-sun.sbs.siemens.com>, Willard Dawson writes: >I just tried to compile, this time with openssh-1.2pre14, openssl-0.9.4 >and egd-0.6. I get considerably further along, but still not completely >compiled. Here are the last bits: > >gcc -g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DETCDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\" -DSSH_PR >OGRAM=\"/usr/local/bin/ssh\" -DASKPASS_PROGRAM=\"/usr/local/libexec/ssh/ssh-as >kpass\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c bsd-daemon.c >bsd-daemon.c: In function `daemon': >bsd-daemon.c:70:...

Hello, I got this information from the manufacturer of my ups Kobian/Mercury and were tested wtih powstatd on Linux (Works OK). Now i want to configure it with NUT and i didn't have any luck (it always says OB) Initiliasation for monitoring: RTS = 1 (High) Main power fail: CTS = 0 (Low) Batter low: DCD = 0 (Low) Kill UPS: DTR = 0 (Low) How would the ups.conf look like? Reagards, Lep

...gt; Someone else emailed about that to me earlier today. > > The current limit is set at 10 for llvm-commits. It sounds like that is too > low. > > Does anyone that uses Phabricator have an idea of how much to increase this > limit? Would 20 suffice, or are more people than that CC'ed on Phabricator > emails? I'm not exactly sure why Phab should need a higher limit. I've seen a few Phab emails come through with a list as long as my arm - but I don't know why that happens. Anyone know where those are coming from? Maybe it's people using Herald to subsc...

...tion using > restructured text and not HTML. > > What steps do I need to take to get libc++ a Sphinx builder and get > the required changes made for libcxx.llvm.org? To add a documentation builder for the buildbot infrastructure here are the basic steps. 0. Check with Dmitri Gribenko (CC'ed) that he is happy to host another builder for the libcxx documentation on his build slave. If not you will have to find another buildbot slave to use when you add an entry to ``_get_documentation_builders()`` in step 3. 1. Add support for building the docs in the CMake build for libcxx. Use...

...<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Brian Gesiak via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> In https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq0q1hfzidg, Adam Nemet (cc'ed) describes >> optimization remarks and some future plans for the project. I had a few >> follow-up questions: >> >> 1. As an example of future work to be done, the talk mentions expanding the >> set of optimization passes that emit remarks. However, the Clang U...

...#39;ve raised this issue a couple of times in the last few weeks. >> >> >> >> In practice this has a detrimental effect to the development workflow >> >> because it means that code is being seen only by a small group of >> >> individuals who have web accounts. The code isn't hitting llvm-commits >> or >> >> cfe-commits where the majority of code maintainers use the mailing >> lists for >> >> review. >> >> >> >> At this point I think Phabricator should be disabled and patches >> s...

...x. On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 3:46 PM Praveen Velliengiri < praveenvelliengiri at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Geoff, > Gathering from past, I remember that the ORCv2 doesn't support thread > local variable but not sure what is the current status now. What platform > you are on? > CC'ed (Lang hames) he knows exactly what is the status. > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 18:39, Geoff Levner via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I am in the process of porting our ORC code to ORC v2 and LLJIT. Now that >> I have worked around a problem...