search for: cberger

On Monday 14 June 2010, Nathan Jeffords wrote: > I built the list by hand though trial and error. I'm not sure if and how > llvm-config works with cmake. Its seems now that I got the > right dependencies in the right order, there have been no > ongoing maintenance issues. I use llvm-config with cmake, for this I wrote a FindLLVM.cmake file [1], it provides a FIND_LLVM_LIBS macro

...known component name: pic16codegen. And, llvm-config --libs core only returns -lLLVMCore (it should return -lLLVMSystem and -lLLVMSupport). And thank you for FindLLVM.cmake. When I have working llvm-config script, I'll use it. Thanks. Sam On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Cyrille Berger <cberger at cberger.net> wrote: > On Monday 14 June 2010, Nathan Jeffords wrote: > > I built the list by hand though trial and error. I'm not sure if and how > > llvm-config works with cmake. Its seems now that I got the > > right dependencies in the right order, there have been...

I built the list by hand though trial and error. I'm not sure if and how llvm-config works with cmake. Its seems now that I got the right dependencies in the right order, there have been no ongoing maintenance issues. On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:32 PM, sam lee <skynare at gmail.com> wrote: > Ah, thank you so much. > How did you get the list of target_link_libraries() ? > Did you

On Friday 24 October 2008, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Apart from me, I only know of one person that tried CMake, and it was by > accident. Well I tried it on linux, and it sounds like it worked. Well llvm was build without error, but since I prefer to stick to released llvm, I didn't if the results of the compilation was usuable ;) -- Cyrille Berger

On Monday 09 June 2008, Albert Graef wrote: > Unfortunately, that approach doesn't work on x86-64 with LLVM 2.2, > since some parts of the LLVM JIT apparently contain non-relocatable > code; I hope that this will be fixed in the forthcoming LLVM 2.3. Unfortunately it's not fixed in 2.3 :( I made a patch ([1]) for 2.2 and gave it to one of the developer, I guess he forgot about

Hi, > Cool, many thanks! That's exactly what I've been looking for. :) If you > do get around updating the patch for 2.3, it would be very kind if you > could let me know. I have updated the patch for llvm 2.3, and open a bug report to follow the status on this subject: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2514 -- Cyrille Berger

On Sunday 18 May 2008, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> writes: > > [snip] > > > Others have suggested alternative build systems before like cmake. > > Apparently cmake can autogenerate VC++ and Xcode project files from > > the same thing that it builds from on unix systems. > > cmake creating VC++ project files does not appeal