llvm dev - Jul 2008 - [LLVMdev] Shared libs?

Cyrille Berger wrote:
> Unfortunately it's not fixed in 2.3 :(
That's indeed unfortunate. On x86-64 the Pure interpreter currently is a
7MB behemoth, and most of that is LLVM. ;-) On 32 bit I have all that
stuff in a separate runtime library, resulting in a 27K interpreter
executable. It goes without saying that this makes a world of a
difference. I don't care if LLVM is a shared library itself, and I
understand the reasons speaking against that, but it should at least be
linkable into a dll.
> [1] http://www.opengtl.org/download/X86JITInfo.cpp.pic.patch
Cool, many thanks! That's exactly what I've been looking for. :) If you
do get around updating the patch for 2.3, it would be very kind if you
could let me know.

Thanks,
Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag

Hi,
> Cool, many thanks! That's exactly what I've been looking for. :) If
you
> do get around updating the patch for 2.3, it would be very kind if you
> could let me know.
I have updated the patch for llvm 2.3, and open a bug report to follow the 
status on this subject: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2514

-- 
Cyrille Berger

Cyrille Berger wrote:
> I have updated the patch for llvm 2.3, and open a bug report to follow the 
> status on this subject: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2514
Great, many thanks! So now I just have to make Pure compile with LLVM
2.3. :) I see in the release notes that some classes have changed
(notably the LLVMBuilder stuff), is there a porting guide available
somewhere?

Albert

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de
WWW:    http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag