search for: cautiously

I'm sure many are running ext4 FS's in production, but just want to be re-assured that there are not currently any major issues before starting a new project that looks like it will be using ext4. I've previously been using xfs but the software for this project requires ext3/ext4. I'm always very cautious before jumping onto a new FS, (new in the sense it is officially supported

...I can readily do: education.wife <- factor(education.wife, labels=factorlabels) But this breaks: education.man <- factor(education.man, labels=factorlabels) because none of the families have a husband who went beyond college. I get around this problem in a limited way by: cautiously <- function(x, labels) { factor(x, labels=factorlabels[as.numeric(levels(factor(x)))]) } education.man <- cautiously(education.man, labels=factorlabels) Now I get: > table(education.man) School College 4 4 > table(education.wife)...

Dear list, has anyone written a package/function in R for computing a point- biserial resp. biserial correlation? Thanks in advance Bernd

Is it possible to emulate a unionfs with zfs and zones somehow? My zones are sparse zones and I want to make part of /usr writable within a zone. (/usr/perl5/mumble to be exact) I can''t just mount a writable directory on top of /usr/perl5 because then it hides all the stuff in the global zone. I could repopulate it in the local zone but ugh that is unattractive. I''m hoping

I'm running Dovecot on a Debian system which recently has been failing on an assert(). I have a spam mailbox that if I try and open (from any client), the imap process dies and this is written to the error logs: Dec 21 18:57:11 theronge imap(mronge): file imap-bodystructure.c: line 278 (part_parse_headers): assertion failed: (part->physical_pos >= input->v_offset -

I have a script that goes wrong because I assumed that seq.int would return integers. Below please see it does not unless user is super cautious about inserting "L" with inputs. I think seq.int should do coercion for me before returning the sequence. > xx <- seq.int(1,10) > class(xx) [1] "integer" > is.integer(xx) [1] TRUE > xx <- seq.int(1,10, 2) >

LLVMers, The 2.6 code freeze is this friday, August 21, at 9pm PDT. All major changes should be checked into SVN at this time. Please monitor the buildbots closely for any failures. I ask you to be very cautious with what you commit to svn over the next few days. This is not the time to be adding experimental code :) Please help us keep LLVM as stable as possible over the next few days.

Hi, I''ve just built rpm''s for puppet-0.23.1 - since there were a few people who had trouble with the update for 0.23.0 (the change in config files requires a bit of rpm trickery), I decided to be a little more cautious in how I push the new packages. So far, new packages are (or, will be shortly) available in rawhide, Fedora 7 updates-testing, and in my yum repos for

At office I'm cautiously introducing R to be used as the basic statistical program, getting rid of licensed stuff or reducing the amount of it. The aim of R would be to run generic statistical programs built & "consumed" when needed and some static procedure dealing with time-series. Now, we have substantiall...

Am 2018-05-30 um 18:22 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 2018-05-30 um 17:36 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> On Wed, 30 May 2018 17:22:56 +0200 >> "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> can / should I test this with 3.6.25 already? >>> Unfortunately I don't have a valid ADS user/pw yet

On 15/06/2015 17:46, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 14.06.2015, 10:46 +0100 schrieb Mark: >> Since upgrading to Debian Wheezy > ... >> # 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf >> # OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-kirkwood armv5tel Debian 7.8 > > So it's dovecot from the backports. > Didn't you notice that since about 2 months there's now jessie out? I did.

Hello. I am Liu Chi(??) from Peking University, China. I am planning to join GSoC. I am interested in Xapian and looking forward to find something interesting in GSoC 2014 Project Ideas List. The topic of "Clustering of Search Results" looks interesting and I think it suits me. I have been involved in a project that aims to clustering tweets based on the text similarity and user

Then how about enable these flags for -O2? I want to hear from other people cc'ed, and I may be too cautious, but I'd hesitate to define a new ELF section if there's other mean already available to achieve the same thing. On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > Not all users compile their code with -ffunction-sections and >

Since we don't know much about the calling environment, which might have a limited stack, might be taking input from untrusted sources, or we might not have other stack protections enabled, it's best to be cautious about using unbounded stack allocations. We're not in fact using them in libnbd, but this change prevents them from being added in future. --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file

Hello list, I've recently been working with LibreSSL on CentOS 7 and I thought I'd share it. I would be cautious about using it on production servers, but it seems to be behaving itself for me. https://librelamp.com/ I packaged it to install in parallel with OpenSSL rather than replace it. Apache (2.4.16), MariaDB (5.5.45) and PHP (5.6.12) complete the lamp stack. With MariaDB I

Hai, Sorry for the late reply. Here its just apt-get distupgrade --autoremove --purge Without the autoremove libldb1 is not removed so libldb2 can be installed. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stefan G. Weichinger via samba > Verzonden: zaterdag 30 november 2019 20:33 > Aan: samba at

Greetings, I've been wondering about the index format and backwards compatibility. We're using the dev version (for chert) and each svn up means that any indexes created prior to this revision cannot be read. Is this purely a cautious move to prevent errors, and, barring any obvious index format changes, can I safely force the current revision to read existing indexes? eg, by

Hi I've searched the archives and was not able to find an anwser. I have unzipped syslinux into my C: drive instead of putting it into its own directory. Being cautious I do not want to delete all matching files/directories in the syslinux zip file that match in the C: drive. Afraid that syslinux might have overwritten some with a syslinux version. I do not have a clue. Can someone tell me

I have configured my GS HT-486 for "send dtmf" in audio, and on the asterisk box, sip.conf has dtmfmode set to inband. Everything seems to be working fine, however, I see my console get flooded with the following warning: "dsp.c:1467 ast_dsp_process: Unable to process inband DTMF on 256 frames" Should I be cautious about them or just ignore? Better still, what should I do

An ext3 patch against linux 2.4.10 is at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ This patch is *lightly tested* - ie, it boots and does stuff. The changes to ext3 are small, but the kernel which it patches has recently changed a lot. If you're cautious, please wait a couple of days. The patch retains the buffer-tracing code. This will soon be broken out into a separate patch to make