search for: cates

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 65 matches for "cates".

Did you mean: gates
2000 Jul 04
1
Documentation bug (is.R). (PR#590)
Full_Name: Giacomo Catenazzi Version: 1.0.1 OS: Linux (Debian) Submission from: (NULL) (129.132.9.24) >From is.R documentation: `if (exists(is.R) && is.function(is.R) && is.R()) {' ` '## R-specific code `} else {' ` '## S-version of code `}' It should be writen as '' exists("is.R") '' (is.R must be
2018 Mar 05
2
Fts solr and https
Hi, Dovecot 2.2.32-34 FreeBSD 10.4 Solr 7.2.1(Centos 6) When I try to use https to connect to solr, I get error when a self-signed certificate: Mar 3 05:15:47 server dovecot: indexer-worker(email at domain.com): Received invalid SSL certificate: self signed certificate: /C=Country/ ST=State/L=Location/O=Organization/OU=Organizational Unit/CN=solr.domain.com Mar 3 05:15:47 server dovecot:
2017 Oct 12
4
Discourage the weights= option of lm with summarized data
OK. We have now three suggestions to repair the text: - remove the text - add "not" at the beginning of the text - add at the end of the text a warning; something like: "Note that in this case the standard estimates of the parameters are in general not correct, and hence also the t values and the p value. Also the number of degrees of freedom is not correct. (The parameter
2004 Jun 21
0
Error compiling festival
Hi, I had followed the installation-guide to festival http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+festival+installation speech-tools compiles OK, but I got this error when compiling asterisk if I compile without the patch it compiles, but of cause did'nt work with asterisk. any clue ? /Hans-Henrik Andresen Making in directory src/modules/base ... making dependencies -- modules.cc
2017 Oct 09
2
Discourage the weights= option of lm with summarized data
Yes. Thank you; I should have quoted it. I suggest to remove this text or to add the word "not" at the beginning. Arie On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Viechtbauer Wolfgang (SP) <wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote: > Ah, I think you are referring to this part from ?lm: > > "(including the case that there are w_i observations equal to y_i and
2007 Dec 04
1
dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1
Everyone, Looks like my Centos 5.0 mail server upgraded automatically last night to 5.1. It appears to have worked normally until about 16:00 CST when dovecot began to fail. I have rebooted the system to be able to use the 5.1 kernel, but dovecot still continues to fail. Has anyone else made this observation? My log entries are below Thanks in advance!!!! Greg Ennis
2002 Aug 13
2
Additional printer drivers
...ocal/samba/printers write list = @ntadmin,root guest ok = Yes [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No Brett Cates Network Administrator Campbell Health System The difference between e-mail and regular mail is that computers handle e-mail, and computers never decide to come to work one day and shoot all the other computers. -Jamais Cascio, 1995 --------------------------------------------------------...
2017 Dec 03
1
Discourage the weights= option of lm with summarized data
Peter, This is a highly structured text. Just for the discussion, I separate the building blocks, where (D) and (E) and (F) are new: BEGIN OF TEXT -------------------- (A) Non-?NULL? ?weights? can be used to indicate that different observations have different variances (with the values in ?weights? being inversely proportional to the variances); (B) or equivalently, when the elements of
2018 Mar 19
0
Fts solr and https
Hello, Excuse me, Is dovecot really unable to work with solr through https ? I tried to change ssl_client_ca_dir and ssl_client_ca_file, but nothing. Alex 2018-03-05 21:56: > Hi, > > Dovecot 2.2.32-34 > FreeBSD 10.4 > > Solr 7.2.1(Centos 6) > > > When I try to use https to connect to solr, I get error when a > self-signed certificate: > > Mar 3
2017 Oct 08
2
Discourage the weights= option of lm with summarized data
Indeed: Using 'weights' is not meant to indicate that the same observation is repeated 'n' times. As I showed, this gives erroneous results. Hence I suggested that it is discouraged rather than encouraged in the Details section of lm in the Reference manual. Arie ---Original Message----- On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl wrote: Using
2017 Nov 28
0
Discourage the weights= option of lm with summarized data
My local R-devel version now has (in ?lm) Non-?NULL? ?weights? can be used to indicate that different observations have different variances (with the values in ?weights? being inversely proportional to the variances); or equivalently, when the elements of ?weights? are positive integers w_i, that each response y_i is the mean of w_i unit-weight observations
2017 Nov 28
0
Discourage the weights= option of lm with summarized data
Since the three posters agree (only) that there is a bug, I propose to file it as a bug, which is the least we can do now. There is more to it: the only other case of a change in the Reference Manual which I know of, is also about the weights option! This is in coxph. The Reference Manual version 3.0.0 (2013) says about coxph: " ... If weights is a vector of integers, then the estimated
2013 May 28
3
Nueva consulta
Hola buenas tardes: Vuelvo a solicitar su ayuda porque no puedo saber que pasa. Estoy usando el documento 'Regresión Logística Categor/Tema 4 Cate.pdf como guía y el ejemplo que ustedes conocen de los cangrejos (crab.txt). Cargo los datos, los guardo en un data frame llamado tabla; al pedir tabla[1:5,] obtengo: color spine width satell weight 1 3 3 28.3 8 3050 2 4
2017 Oct 09
0
Discourage the weights= option of lm with summarized data
AFAIR, it is a little more subtle than that. If you have replication weights, then the estimates are right, it is "just" that the SE from summary.lm() are wrong. Somehow, the text should reflect this. It is of some importance when you put glm() into the mix, because you can in fact get correct results from things like y <- c(0,1) w <- c(49,51) glm(y~1, weights=w,
2006 Aug 09
3
categorical data
Dear List, I neeed a grouped list with two sort of categorical data. I have a data .frame like this. year cat. b c 1 2006 a1 125 212 2 2006 a2 256 212 3 2005 a1 14 12 4 2004 a3 565 123 5 2004 a2 156 789 6 2005 a1 1 456 7 2003 a2 786 123 8 2003 a1 421 569 9 2002 a2 425 245 I need a list with the sum of b and c for every year and every cat (a1, a2 or a3) in this year. I had used the tapply
2012 Sep 13
10
access key error
I am getting following error while run my rails app in my server ActionView::Template::Error (You did not provide both required access keys. Please provide the access_key_id and the secret_access_key.): -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to
2008 Feb 06
0
kruskal's MONANOVA algorithm
I am trying to obtain the Kruskal (1964) secondary least-squares monotonic transformation of a rank variable given 4 categorical variables in order to obtain optimal transformation for regression. The academic problem assigned is to compare R, SPSS (Conjoint Analysis), and SAS' proc transreg in speed and accuracy. Currently, SAS and SPSS are giving similar results, but R's are quite
2011 Apr 22
1
convert string to variable
Hello, Is it possible to convert a string to a variable? I have a set of names: > stocks [1] "ACCELL" "AHOLD" "AJAX" "ARCADIS" "BALLAST" "BAM.GROEP" [7] "BESI" "BETER.BED" "BINCKBANK.NV" "BOSKALIS" "CATE" "CROWN.V.GELDER" And a
2011 Nov 14
1
.jinit() : Cannot create Java virtual machine
Dear all, when using .jinit() I get the message .jinit() : Cannot create Java virtual machine (-1). The details: I am using the Dismo package.Dismo has a function 'maxent' that communi-cates with this program(MaxEnt).MaxEnt is available as a stand-alone Java program. It is normal when I execute the command : "jar <- paste(system.file(package="dismo"), "/java/maxent.jar", sep='')" when I execute the function: xm <- maxent(predictors...
2007 Dec 04
1
[Fwd: dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1]
Everyone, Looks like my Centos 5.0 mail server upgraded automatically last night to 5.1. It appears to have worked normally until about 16:00 CST when dovecot began to fail. I have rebooted the system to be able to use the 5.1 kernel, but dovecot still continues to fail. Has anyone else made this observation? My log entries are below Thanks in advance!!!! Greg Ennis