search for: casttest3

All SingleSource and MultiSource tests failed in last run of FreeBSD nighttester (and in previous). Mostly with error: ---8X--------------------- gcc -O3 Output/2002-05-02-CastTest3.llc-ls.s -lm -o Output/2002-05-02-CastTest3.llc-ls /var/tmp//ccwC1BGs.o(.text+0x14): In function `main': : undefined reference to `__llvm_getGlobalCtors' /var/tmp//ccwC1BGs.o(.text+0x2b): In function `main': : undefined reference to `__llvm_getGlobalDtors' /var/tmp//ccwC1BGs.o(.t...

...Source tests failed in last run of FreeBSD > nighttester (and in previous). > Mostly with error: This looks like your crtend.a file did not get built correctly. Try doing make clean/make install in llvm/runtime/ again. -Chris > ---8X--------------------- > gcc -O3 Output/2002-05-02-CastTest3.llc-ls.s -lm -o > Output/2002-05-02-CastTest3.llc-ls > /var/tmp//ccwC1BGs.o(.text+0x14): In function `main': > : undefined reference to `__llvm_getGlobalCtors' > /var/tmp//ccwC1BGs.o(.text+0x2b): In function `main': > : undefined reference to `__llvm_getGlobalDtors'...

...malloc SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest1 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest2 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ManyArguments SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-03-NotTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-19-DivTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-02-CastTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-02-CastTest2 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-19-CodegenBug SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-10-09-A...

...e/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-04-22-Switch | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-31-LongShifts | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3 | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-19-CodegenBug | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-07-17-INT-To-FP | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar...

...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest2 | 0.0018 652 0.0029 * 0.0028 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3 | 0.0023 660 0.0029 * 0.0027 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ManyArguments | 0.0026 660 0.0026 * 0.0023...

...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest2 | 0.0000 656 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3 | 0.0000 668 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ManyArguments | 0.0000 660 0.0040 * 0.0000...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest2 | 0.0030 648 0.0023 * 0.0063 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3 | 0.0079 680 0.0025 * 0.0025 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ManyArguments | 0.0028 656 0.0021 * 0.0021...

...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest2 | 0.0010 684 0.0014 * 0.0016 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3 | 0.0009 688 0.0015 * 0.0015 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ManyArguments | 0.0012 680 0.0015 * 0.0014...

...01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest2                              | > 0.0000 736      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3                              | > 0.0000 684      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ManyArguments                          | > 0.0000 696      0.0000      *          ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02- > CastTest2 | 0.0000 736 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02- > CastTest3 | 0.0000 684 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02- > ManyArguments | 0.0000 696 0.0000 &g...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...eNoPatch SizeNoPatch MergedWithPatch TimeWithPatch SizeWithPatch 2002-04-17-PrintfChar.ll 2 2172 0 0.00 2163 0 0.00 2163 2002-05-02-ArgumentTest.ll 2 3164 0 0.01 3155 0 0.01 3155 2002-05-02-CastTest1.ll 1 2121 0 0.01 2112 0 0.01 2112 2002-05-02-CastTest2.ll 2 3803 0 0.01 3794 0 0.01 3794 2002-05-02-CastTest3.ll 1 2938 0 0.01 2929 0 0.01 2929 2002-05-02-CastTest.ll 2 11291 0 0.01 11282 0 0.01 11282 2002-05-02-ManyArguments.ll 2 4222 0 0.01 4213 0 0.01 4213 2002-05-03-NotTest.ll 3 6111 0 0.01 6102 0 0.01 6102 2002-05-19-DivTest.ll 3 3553 0 0.01 3544 0 0.01 3544 2002-08-02-CastTest2.ll 2 2144 0 0.01 2135...