Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "casttest".
2010 Aug 05
1
[LLVMdev] possible miscompilation of openssl on x86-64
...ot the
right person to start debugging it...
Thanks,
John Regehr
../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./bftest
testing blowfish in raw ecb mode
testing blowfish in ecb mode
testing blowfish set_key
testing blowfish in cbc mode
testing blowfish in cfb64 mode
testing blowfish in ofb64
../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./casttest
ecb cast error encrypting for keysize 128
got :9B 8C 2F F3 49 DB 70 23
expected:23 8B 4F E5 84 7E 44 B2
ecb cast error encrypting for keysize 80
got :D5 3F 3D 1D F4 5E E0 65
expected:EB 6A 71 1A 2C 02 27 1B
ecb cast error encrypting for keysize 40
got :4E 15 A4 62 87 EB 0A A2
expected:7...
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...ession/C/PR640
SingleSource/Regression/C++/short_circuit_dtor
SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray
SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarraymalloc
SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest1
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest2
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ManyArguments
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-03-NotTest
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-19-DivTest
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-02-C...
2004 Jun 21
4
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
...sts as expected
6 ( 1%) tests unexpected FAIL
58 ( 6%) tests unexpected PASS
--- TESTS WITH UNEXPECTED
OUTCOMES -------------------------------------------
Feature.mc.basictest : XPASS
Feature.mc.calltest : XPASS
Feature.mc.casttest : XPASS
Feature.mc.cfgstructures : XPASS
Feature.mc.constexpr : XPASS
Feature.mc.constexprbad : XPASS
Feature.mc.constpointer : XPASS
Feature.mc.forwardreftest...
2004 Jun 20
0
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
Thanks Vladimir. That's great! Glad you got it working.
BTW, the failures you're seeing have been experienced by Chris and I as
well. Chris is diligently working on making the LLVM processing more
consistent so he track down the problem. A week ago or so, these tests
passed at 100%.
Reid.
On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 15:50, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote:
> In attached file.
>
> Vladimir
2004 Jun 20
2
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
In attached file.
Vladimir
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test2004_06_20.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 88488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040620/98042f01/attachment.obj>
2004 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
...needs to be
updated somehow to reflect this...
-Chris
> --- TESTS WITH UNEXPECTED
> OUTCOMES -------------------------------------------
>
> Feature.mc.basictest : XPASS
>
> Feature.mc.calltest : XPASS
>
> Feature.mc.casttest : XPASS
>
> Feature.mc.cfgstructures : XPASS
>
> Feature.mc.constexpr : XPASS
>
> Feature.mc.constexprbad : XPASS
>
> Feature.mc.constpointer : XPASS
&...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...e/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football | * | * |
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-04-22-Switch | * | * |
SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-31-LongShifts | * | * |
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3 | * | * |
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-19-CodegenBug | * | * |
SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-07-17-INT-To-FP | * | * |
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest | 0.0024 596 0.0022 * 0.0021 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest | 0.0039 1580 0.0080 * 0.0077 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest1 | 0.0016 552 0.0020 * 0.0020...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest | 0.0040 580 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest | 0.0040 1600 0.0120 * 0.0080 | 0.00 0.00 0.01 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest1 | 0.0040 536 0.0040 * 0.0000...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest | 0.0033 588 0.0018 * 0.0018 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest | 0.0042 1592 0.0065 * 0.0103 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest1 | 0.0025 544 0.0016 * 0.0015...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest | 0.0011 612 0.0013 * 0.0011 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest | 0.0015 1608 0.0051 * * | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * * | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest1 | 0.0007 576 0.0010 * 0.0010...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...00 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest |
> 0.0000 624 0.0000 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest |
> 0.0000 1508 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.01 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest1 |
> 0.0100 608 0.0000 * ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...n/a n/a
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-
> ArgumentTest | 0.0000 624 0.0000
> * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 *
> 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-
> CastTest | 0.0000 1508 0.0000
> * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.01 *
> 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-
> CastTest1 | 0.0100 608 0.0000
&...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...tachment.sh>
-------------- next part --------------
IRFile NumFunctionsTotal InitialSize MergedNoPatch TimeNoPatch SizeNoPatch MergedWithPatch TimeWithPatch SizeWithPatch
2002-04-17-PrintfChar.ll 2 2172 0 0.00 2163 0 0.00 2163
2002-05-02-ArgumentTest.ll 2 3164 0 0.01 3155 0 0.01 3155
2002-05-02-CastTest1.ll 1 2121 0 0.01 2112 0 0.01 2112
2002-05-02-CastTest2.ll 2 3803 0 0.01 3794 0 0.01 3794
2002-05-02-CastTest3.ll 1 2938 0 0.01 2929 0 0.01 2929
2002-05-02-CastTest.ll 2 11291 0 0.01 11282 0 0.01 11282
2002-05-02-ManyArguments.ll 2 4222 0 0.01 4213 0 0.01 4213
2002-05-03-NotTest.ll 3 6111 0 0.01 61...