search for: cappe

I am currently trying to use LLVM (version 3.2) to generate code for a cluster where each node in the cluster will be running a 64-bit X86 chip, but *not* necessarily the same version of the X86 chip throughout the cluster. I am specifying that I want Position-Independent Code produced because the generated machine code may get moved (before it is executed) to a different logical address that

...+ if test -L $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/oggz$$p ; then \ + $(RM) $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/oggz$$p ; \ fi ; \ done -- Resent, since it did not make it to the list the first time. For the record, new (hopefully) working conf: [format] subjectprefix = PATCH/liboggz [sendemail] from = Vincent Cappe <vcappe at gmail.com> to = Ogg Development <ogg-dev at xiph.org> to = Conrad Parker <conrad at metadecks.org> cc = Vincent Cappe <vcappe at gmail.com>

Hello, Our OS is AIX 6100-06-05-1115 and SAMBA version is 3.3.12.0 We have two network interfaces with different IPs. Now we restrict SAMBA active in onf of the interface. SWAT and smbd can start. But nmbd and winbindd processes can't start. And there is below warning info in log.nmbd and log.winbindd. Please give your suggestions and thx. pekwj42a-> # cat /usr/lib/smb.conf # Samba

FYI, since this is probably of interest to subscribers of this mailing list also. Robert N M Watson ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 22:55:40 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: trustedbsd-audit@TrustedBSD.org, K?vesd?n G?bor <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu>, current@freebsd.org

This is a follow-up on a thread from last year requesting that openssh indicate which authorized key was accepted during a login as opposed to just logging that a key was accepted... Here's the old message: It is possible for ~user/.ssh/authorized_keys to have multiple entries. It would be quite helpful if openssh would enhance the log to indicate WHICH key was

Dear 6-STABLE users, In the next 2-3 weeks, I plan to MFC support for CAPP security eventing auditing from 7-CURRENT to 6-STABLE. The implementation has been running quite nicely in -CURRENT for several months. Right now, I'm just waiting on a confirmation from Sun regarding formal allocation of a BSM header version number so as to avoid accidental version number conflicts in the

Dear 6-STABLE users, In the next 2-3 weeks, I plan to MFC support for CAPP security eventing auditing from 7-CURRENT to 6-STABLE. The implementation has been running quite nicely in -CURRENT for several months. Right now, I'm just waiting on a confirmation from Sun regarding formal allocation of a BSM header version number so as to avoid accidental version number conflicts in the

Hi, I am considering installing several `servers' in a facility that needs to conform with the products listed at: DSD Approved Products http://www.dsd.gov.au/infosec/evaluation_services/epl/dap.html As far as i can see freebsd performs above and beyond, for all the required criteria in the act. Can we see freebsd listed as an approved product in the near future? Best Regards, Jason - RF

Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of Update 2 for the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 family of products, including: - Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium, POWER, S/390 and zSeries - Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium - Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 4 for x86, AMD64/EM64T, Itanium - Red Hat Desktop 4 for x86 and AMD64/EM64T Craig

We have several dozen production Linux servers and I would like to have better control over what files are changed, by whom, when they were changed, etc. Because these are all production servers that are in use 24x7, we do not have the luxury of simply doing a clean build, taking md5sums of each file, and then doing fresh installations. I need a system that can take in-place snapshots of each

Hi everybody, I have several VMs running on Xenserver 6.5 I have 2 samba servers (1 DC & 1 Fileserver). They are both running Debian Linux 8.2 Jessie. I'm using the samba debian package (4.1.17) My VM has 8G RAM and 4 vCPU How can i test if the performances are quite good or not? with reading/writing Could I have better performance with the latest samba release? thanks Pierre --

Hello all, I love CentOS, but I am seriously regretting selecting Centos 4.4 for my production hosting servers. The current situation with CentOS 4.4 and being stuck at Apache 2.0.52 is a huge problem because of the new requirements for the Credit Card industry PCI scan. Apache 2.0.52 does not pass PCI compliance scans. which means no ecommerce on any of these servers - MAJOR ISSUE. So my

First, I hope that this message is not considered flame bait. As someone who has used FreeBSD for for 5+ years now, I have a genuine interest in the integrity of our source code. Second, I hope that this message is not taken as any form of insult or finger pointing. Software without bugs does not exist, and I think we all know that. Acknowledging that point and working to mitigate the risks

Under Solaris 10 on a 4 core Sun Ultra 40 with 20GB RAM, I am setting up a Sun StorageTek 2540 with 12 300GB 15K RPM SAS drives and connected via load-shared 4Gbit FC links. This week I have tried many different configurations, using firmware managed RAID, ZFS managed RAID, and with the controller cache enabled or disabled. My objective is to obtain the best single-file write performance.