search for: callgenerated

I've recently come across two pieces of code using calls to callGeneric() inside the definition of a method. In both cases, it appears to me that the callGeneric call could be replaced with a "real" call to the generic, say foo(x) instead of callGeneric(x) inside method foo. My understanding from the docs is that when called with arguments, it is just like calling the actual

Hello, I've stumbled upon following problem, when trying to overload the methods for group Math for an S4-class which contains functions as slots. setClass("NumFunction", representation = list(fun = "function")) NumFunction <- function(f) new("NumFunction", fun = f) square <- function(x) x^2 NF <- NumFunction(square)

There seems to be an issue with passing "..." to callGeneric(), because it assumes that the call can be evaluated in the parent frame. Due to lazy evaluation, that is often not going to work for arguments that are simply passed down via "...". Here is an example: setClass("A", contains = "character") setClass("B", contains =

I recently encountered this and was wondering if someone could explain what happened. Basis of question involves what the difference between the calls makes as the end result is the same: > identical(matrix(1:8, nrow = 1), array(1:8, c(1, 8))) TRUE If I run the code below as shown, I get the following: > foo(1:8, 4) foo (vector, numeric) val = 4 foo (matrix, ANY) val = 500 foo

I have classes A and B, where B contains A. In the implementation of the group generic for B I would like to use the corresponding group generic for A. Is there a way to do that? I would also appreciate any comments if what I'm trying to do seems like the wrong approach. Here's a stripped down example: setClass("A",

Dear all, This problem came up initially while debugging a function, but it seems to be a more general problem of R. I hope I'm wrong, but I can't find another explanation. Let me illustrate with the raster package. For an object "RasterLayer" (which inherits from Raster), there is a method xyValues defined with the signature

Folks: This is a question about the S4 formal class system. Suppose I have a class, 'foo', defined by: setClass('foo',representation(dat='matrix', id='character') ) I wish to define a '[' method for foo that will extract from the 'dat' slot. I would have thought that the following would work, but it doesn't:

Dear UseRs, Setting methods for groups ("compare" in this case) does not work properly. Once one method is set ,redefining it or even removing does not change the behavior: setClass("foo" ,representation(range="numeric") ) #[1] "foo" setMethod("Compare",c(e1="ANY",e2="foo"), function(e1,e2){ browser()

Hi all, After all these years, I am finally porting some R-2.3.1-based S4 object code to R-2.6.1, dealing with all the S4 object system changes that came in R-2.4.0. I've run across what appears to be some sort of ommission in the implementation of callNextMethod() when used with primitives having group generic methods. In a stock R-2.6.1 patched (happens to be running on AMD64/RHEL 4, but

Hi, I found the following on Windows 2000/NT R Version 1.9.1 (2004-06-21) (also Version 1.9.0): The S4 group "Math" doesn't work as documented; i.e., "log", "log10", "gamma" and "lgamma" are included in the documentation but don't work. See example code below. Moreover, what about 'genericForPrimitive' which is used in

I get an error when using self-defined (not standard) functions with mapply with S4 objects from the raster package that I develop: "Error in as.character(sys.call(sys.parent())[[1]]) : cannot coerce type 'closure' to vector of type 'character'". Does anyone understand why? The problem is illustrated below. Thanks, Robert > # First a general example that works

Hello. This question concerns the Methods package. I have created a new class and am trying to set a method for it for S4 group generic "Summary". I have run into some signature problems. An example: > setClass("track", representation(x="numeric", y="character")) [1] "track" > setGeneric("max", group="Summary")

I have some code where the primary dispatching is on other parameters so I'd like not to have to create a set of functions for "matrix" and another duplicate set for "array". But the class union technique isn't working as implemented below and I don't have my Green book with me. How do I fix my infinite recursion problem?

Hi the list I define a class A (slot a and b), a class C (slot c and d) and a class E that inherit from A and B. I define print(A) and print(B). For print(C), I would like to use both of them, but I do not see how... Thanks for your help... Christophe ---------------------------------------------------------------- Ce message a ete envoye par IMP, grace a l'Universite Paris 10 Nanterre

The Complex group generic for S4 methods is not working: > setClass('foo', representation(z='complex')) [1] "foo" > setMethod('Complex', 'foo', function(z) callGeneric(z@z)) [1] "Complex" > Arg(new('foo', z=1+0i)) Error in Arg(new("foo", z = 1 + (0+0i))) : non-numeric argument to function > The fix is

Is it possible for S4 to (continue) dispatch to a class created during dispatching? The code below doesn't work; is this not possible or have I ommitted something? Concept was to create a SEXP with R_AllocatePtr, give it a class attribute, and continue dispatch. Example code below omits multiple parameters that can be different types. Essentially, any parameter would be converted to an

Dear all, In R-devel I have noticed the new approach for the "ts" class in the package "methods". the "structure" behaviour of "ts" is not always kept when one uses "ts" objects and objects of classes which extend the virtual class "structure". As a short example: ## this works fine setClass("foo", representation(header =

What a delicious example! (I'm taking the liberty of sharing it with r-devel, since it raises some good issues.) You have two questions, presumably: 1 - how could the order of the setMethod calls make a difference in the results? 2 - what's causing the infinite loop & how could it be avoided, reliably? Second question first. The danger sign is the "vector" method:

Hi all, I'm using Asterisk 1.0.9-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC8o on box A with a TE410P (EuroISDN cpe) connected to another similar asterisk box B acting as EuroISDN master. I'm performing some load tests by contiously feeding up to concurrent 30 call files to /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/ on box A which inititate via a dialplan context/extension a outbound call (redirected via chan_local) to

Hi I am having difficulty with setMethod(). I have a "brob" class of objects whose representation has two slots: "x" and "positive". Slot "x" (double) holds the log of a number and slot "positive" (logical) its sign. The idea is that large numbers can be handled. I'm trying to implement a log() method using an analogue of the