search for: callfram

Hi Talin, I have some questions below. If these topics have already been discussed in earlier threads, kindly point me there. I'm aware of your GC proposal, but the rest is new to me. On Jul 1, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Talin wrote: > Garbage collection is still way too difficult. The biggest problem is the inability to track SSA values - it requires the frontend to generate very inefficient and

Hello, i am trying to disable reserved call frame from the x86 backend, by setting hasReservedCallFrame function, in lib/Target/X86/X86RegisterInfo.cpp to always return false. When doing this i get the correct frame size, and the sub/add rsp instructions around the call correctly, but it seems that the offsets from rsp are not correctly updated between the sub instruction and the call. Is this so...

...GICustomOperandRenderer and GISDNodeXFormEquiv. [r322582](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL322582). * The RISC-V backend gained frame pointer elimination and codegen for the RV32M extension. [r322839](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL322839), [r322843](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL322843). * AArch64 will now omit callframe setup/destroy when not needed. [r322917](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL322917). ## Clang commits * Clang gained support for soft-float RISC-V ABI lowering. [r322494](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL322494). * ARMv8.2-A FP16 scalar intrinsics have been added. [r323006](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL323006)....

So I've been using LLVM for about 4 years now, and I've posted a lot on this list about specific issues. What I would like to do is step back for a moment and give my "big picture" assessment of LLVM overall, particularly with respect to developing a "managed" language like Java / C# or my own language, Tart. Obviously, I feel that LLVM is the best choice out there,

I ran into an interesting issue with `evalq` (and also `eval(quote(...))`): ???? f <- function() { ?????? list( ???????? sys.parent(1), ???????? evalq(sys.parent(1)), ???????? evalq((function() sys.parent(2))()),? # add an anon fun layer ???????? evalq((function() sys.parent(1))()) ?????? ) ???? } ???? res <- f() ???? str(res) ???? ## List of 4 ???? ##? $ : int 0???????? # sys.parent(1)

...invoke a specified restart if one is available and return without signaling an error if no such restart is found. Contributed by Lionel Henry in PR#17598. * str(x) now shows the length of attributes in some cases for a data frame x. * Rprof() gains a new argument filter.callframes to request that intervening call frames due to lazy evaluation or explicit eval() calls be omitted from the recorded profile data. Contributed by Lionel Henry in PR#17595. * The handling of ${FOO-bar} and ${FOO:-bar} in Renviron files now follows POSIX shells (at lea...

...invoke a specified restart if one is available and return without signaling an error if no such restart is found. Contributed by Lionel Henry in PR#17598. * str(x) now shows the length of attributes in some cases for a data frame x. * Rprof() gains a new argument filter.callframes to request that intervening call frames due to lazy evaluation or explicit eval() calls be omitted from the recorded profile data. Contributed by Lionel Henry in PR#17595. * The handling of ${FOO-bar} and ${FOO:-bar} in Renviron files now follows POSIX shells (at lea...

...invoke a specified restart if one is available and return without signaling an error if no such restart is found. Contributed by Lionel Henry in PR#17598. * str(x) now shows the length of attributes in some cases for a data frame x. * Rprof() gains a new argument filter.callframes to request that intervening call frames due to lazy evaluation or explicit eval() calls be omitted from the recorded profile data. Contributed by Lionel Henry in PR#17595. * The handling of ${FOO-bar} and ${FOO:-bar} in Renviron files now follows POSIX shells (at lea...