search for: callarg

...* call = dyn_cast<CallInst>(cast<Value>(I)); if (!call) continue; Function* callee = call->getCalledFunction(); if (!callee && !callee->isDeclaration()) continue; if (callee->getName() != func2.getName()) continue; SmallVector<Value*, 16> callargs(call->op_begin(), call->op_end()); callargs.insert(callargs.begin(), ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(context), call->getNumArgOperands())); callargs.insert(callargs.begin(), callee->getName()); CallInst* newcall = CallInst::Create(launch, callargs, "&...

...= call->getCalledFunction(); if (!callee && !callee->isDeclaration()) continue; if (callee->getName() != func2.getName()) continue; SmallVector<Value*, 16> callargs(call->op_begin(), call->op_end()); callargs.insert(callargs.begin(), ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(context), call->getNumArgOperands()));...

The SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs.c test uses the %lf format specifier for printf. However, "man printf" does not specify what this means. Shouldn't the following patch be applied? - Volodya -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: callargs.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 14...

...e only if a time.vector was not specified. o concept of the "main function" which accepts typical plot arguments (xlim, ylim, main, etc) -- not necessarily the top-level call. By default, a depth-first search is used to find a function that accepts `xlim` or `...`. o callArg() now uses standard evaluation by default, rather than quoting its argument. Old code will need to be changed! o use RGtk2 rather than gWidgets for edit.call and edit.annotations because gWidgets is very slow. o reasonable guess for data points and labels with ggplot::qplot() o ena...

...e only if a time.vector was not specified. o concept of the "main function" which accepts typical plot arguments (xlim, ylim, main, etc) -- not necessarily the top-level call. By default, a depth-first search is used to find a function that accepts `xlim` or `...`. o callArg() now uses standard evaluation by default, rather than quoting its argument. Old code will need to be changed! o use RGtk2 rather than gWidgets for edit.call and edit.annotations because gWidgets is very slow. o reasonable guess for data points and labels with ggplot::qplot() o ena...

...edShift SingleSource/Regression/C/2008-01-07-LongDouble SingleSource/Regression/C++/2008-01-29-ParamAliasesReturn SingleSource/Regression/C++/2011-03-28-Bitfield SingleSource/Regression/C/badidx SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack SingleSource/Regression/C++/BuiltinTypeInfo SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs SingleSource/Regression/C/casts SingleSource/Regression/C/compare SingleSource/Regression/C/ConstructorDestructorAttributes SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/class_hierarchy SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ConditionalExpr SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_c...

...ct.c:2529 result = <optimized out> call = 0x7ffff7ab3530 <type_call> #17 0x00007ffff7af2036 in do_call (nk=<optimized out>, na=<optimized out>, pp_stack=0x7fffffffd1f0, func=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Python/ceval.c:4626 callargs = <optimized out> kwdict = {'credentials': <credentials.Credentials at remote 0xc23620>} result = 0x0 #18 call_function (oparg=<optimized out>, pp_stack=0x7fffffffd1f0) at /usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Python/ceval.c:4431 func = <optimized out>...

On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > Anyone? Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 862 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:

...ngleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionBitfields | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-IndirectGoto | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-VolatileError...

...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | 0.0172 3328 0.0153 * 0.0147 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs | 0.0031 884 0.0035 * 0.0034 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | 0.0078 4252 0.0194 *...

...0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | 0.0160 3312 0.0080 * 0.0120 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs | 0.0000 884 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | 0.0120 4304 0.0200 *...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | 0.0197 3300 0.0138 * 0.0125 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs | 0.0037 880 0.0070 * 0.0027 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | 0.0076 4296 0.0155 *...

...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | 0.0066 3160 0.0066 * 0.0067 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs | 0.0014 912 0.0021 * 0.0021 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | 0.0032 4324 0.0122 *...

...      0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack                                       | > 0.0000 4820     0.0200      *                0.0100      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.03 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs                                       | > 0.0000 928      0.0100      *                0.0100      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/casts                                          | > 0.0000 3612     0.0100      *...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...- n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/ > bigstack | 0.0000 4820 > 0.0200 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 > * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/ > callargs | 0.0000 928 > 0.0100 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 > * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/ > casts | 0.0000 3612 >...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make