Displaying 20 results from an estimated 22 matches for "callargs".
2011 Sep 22
2
[LLVMdev] How to const char* Value for function argument
...* call = dyn_cast<CallInst>(cast<Value>(I));
if (!call) continue;
Function* callee = call->getCalledFunction();
if (!callee && !callee->isDeclaration()) continue;
if (callee->getName() != func2.getName()) continue;
SmallVector<Value*, 16> callargs(call->op_begin(), call->op_end());
callargs.insert(callargs.begin(),
ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(context),
call->getNumArgOperands()));
callargs.insert(callargs.begin(), callee->getName());
CallInst* newcall = CallInst::Create(launch, callargs, "&q...
2011 Sep 22
0
[LLVMdev] How to const char* Value for function argument
...= call->getCalledFunction();
if (!callee && !callee->isDeclaration()) continue;
if (callee->getName() != func2.getName()) continue;
SmallVector<Value*, 16> callargs(call->op_begin(), call->op_end());
callargs.insert(callargs.begin(),
ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt32Ty(context),
call->getNumArgOperands()));...
2004 Jul 12
1
[LLVMdev] %lf specifier
The SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs.c test uses the %lf format specifier
for printf. However, "man printf" does not specify what this means. Shouldn't
the following patch be applied?
- Volodya
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: callargs.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 146...
2008 Jun 19
0
playwith 0.8-55
playwith package version 0.8-55 is now on CRAN.
It provides a GTK+ interface for interacting with R plots.
Screenshots of some examples are online at:
http://code.google.com/p/playwith/wiki/Screenshots
Changes in Version 0.8-55
o argument `parameters`: automatically constructs
widgets to control parameter values appearing in the call.
o default action when dragging on the plot is zoom.
2008 Jun 19
0
playwith 0.8-55
playwith package version 0.8-55 is now on CRAN.
It provides a GTK+ interface for interacting with R plots.
Screenshots of some examples are online at:
http://code.google.com/p/playwith/wiki/Screenshots
Changes in Version 0.8-55
o argument `parameters`: automatically constructs
widgets to control parameter values appearing in the call.
o default action when dragging on the plot is zoom.
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...edShift
SingleSource/Regression/C/2008-01-07-LongDouble
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2008-01-29-ParamAliasesReturn
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2011-03-28-Bitfield
SingleSource/Regression/C/badidx
SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack
SingleSource/Regression/C++/BuiltinTypeInfo
SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs
SingleSource/Regression/C/casts
SingleSource/Regression/C/compare
SingleSource/Regression/C/ConstructorDestructorAttributes
SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice
SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/class_hierarchy
SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ConditionalExpr
SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_co...
2017 Feb 26
2
samba-tool domain classicupgrade smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument)
...ct.c:2529
result = <optimized out>
call = 0x7ffff7ab3530 <type_call>
#17 0x00007ffff7af2036 in do_call (nk=<optimized out>, na=<optimized out>, pp_stack=0x7fffffffd1f0,
func=<optimized out>)
at /usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Python/ceval.c:4626
callargs = <optimized out>
kwdict = {'credentials': <credentials.Credentials at remote 0xc23620>}
result = 0x0
#18 call_function (oparg=<optimized out>, pp_stack=0x7fffffffd1f0) at
/usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Python/ceval.c:4431
func = <optimized out>...
2017 Feb 16
2
samba-tool domain classicupgrade smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument)
On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote:
> Anyone?
Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 862 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...ngleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionBitfields | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-03-15-IndirectGoto | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-VolatileError...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | 0.0172 3328 0.0153 * 0.0147 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs | 0.0031 884 0.0035 * 0.0034 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | 0.0078 4252 0.0194 * 0...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | 0.0160 3312 0.0080 * 0.0120 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs | 0.0000 884 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | 0.0120 4304 0.0200 * 0...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | 0.0197 3300 0.0138 * 0.0125 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs | 0.0037 880 0.0070 * 0.0027 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | 0.0076 4296 0.0155 * 0...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack | 0.0066 3160 0.0066 * 0.0067 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs | 0.0014 912 0.0021 * 0.0021 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | 0.0032 4324 0.0122 * *...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
... 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack |
> 0.0000 4820 0.0200 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs |
> 0.0000 928 0.0100 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/casts |
> 0.0000 3612 0.0100 * ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...- n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> bigstack | 0.0000 4820
> 0.0200 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00
> * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> callargs | 0.0000 928
> 0.0100 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00
> * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> casts | 0.0000 3612
>...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make