Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "c9t2d0".
Did you mean:
c0t2d0
2010 Feb 27
1
slow zfs scrub?
...c8t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2-2 ONLINE 0 0 0
c9t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c9t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c9t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c9t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c9t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c9t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c9t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
logs
mirror-3 ONLINE 0 0 0
c10d1...
2011 Feb 06
1
Drive id confusion
...d about drive IDs. The "c5t0d0"
names are very far removed from the real world, and possibly they''ve
gotten screwed up somehow. Is devfsadm supposed to fix those, or does
it only delete excess?
Reason I believe it''s confused:
zpool status shows mirror-0 on c9t3d0, c9t2d0, and c9t5d0. But format
shows the one remaining Seagate 400GB drive at c5t0d0 (my initial pool
was two of those; I replaced one with a Samsung 1TB earlier today). Now
the mirror with three drives in is my very first mirror, which has to
have the one remaining Seagate drive in it (given that I...
2010 Nov 06
10
Apparent SAS HBA failure-- now what?
...one, 9h52m to go
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
uberdisk1 UNAVAIL 55 0 0 insufficient replicas
raidz2 UNAVAIL 112 0 0 insufficient replicas
c9t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c9t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c9t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c10t0d0 UNAVAIL 43 30 0 experienced I/O failures
c10t1d0 REMOVED 0 0 0
c10t2d0 ONLINE 74 0 0
c11t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c11t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: 1 data errors,...
2010 Oct 19
8
Balancing LVOL fill?
...3 1.22M 56.1K
c8t6d0 - - 35 3 1.22M 56.1K
c8t7d0 - - 34 3 1.22M 56.1K
raidz2 12.0T 631G 101 7 6.50M 294K
c9t0d0 - - 39 3 1.56M 58.7K
c9t1d0 - - 39 3 1.56M 58.7K
c9t2d0 - - 39 3 1.56M 58.7K
c9t3d0 - - 39 3 1.56M 58.7K
spare - - 472 42 7.16M 83.9K
c9t4d0 - - 39 3 1.56M 58.7K
c9t7d0 - - 0 259 2 6.85M
c9t5d0 - - 39...
2010 Oct 16
4
resilver question
Hi all
I''m seeing some rather bad resilver times for a pool of WD Green drives (I know, bad drives, but leave that). Does resilver go through the whole pool or just the VDEV in question?
--
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
roy at karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres
2010 Nov 01
6
Excruciatingly slow resilvering on X4540 (build 134)
Hello,
I''m working with someone who replaced a failed 1TB drive (50% utilized),
on an X4540 running OS build 134, and I think something must be wrong.
Last Tuesday afternoon, zpool status reported:
scrub: resilver in progress for 306h0m, 63.87% done, 173h7m to go
and a week being 168 hours, that put completion at sometime tomorrow night.
However, he just reported zpool status shows: