search for: c4t4d0

...0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0...

...eopened but I post it here since some people where seeing something similar. Example and attached zdb output: filer01a:/$ uname -a SunOS filer01a 5.11 snv_130 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris filer01a:/$ zpool create zpool01 raidz2 c4t0d0 c4t1d0 c4t2d0 c4t4d0 c4t5d0 c4t6d0 filer01a:/$ zpool create zpool01 raidz2 c4t0d0 c4t1d0 c4t2d0 c4t4d0 c4t5d0 c4t6d0 filer01a:/$ zfs list zpool01 NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zpool01 123K 5.33T 42.0K /zpool01 filer01a:/$ df -h /zpool01...

...STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypooladas DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t8d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open c4t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t10d0 ONLINE 0 0...

...versions. scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t5d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t2d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0p0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors Thanks for any help. -------------- next...

...0 0 spare DEGRADED 0 0 0 c6t6d0 DEGRADED 0 0 0 too many errors c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ... spares c4t0d0 INUSE currently in use c4t4d0 AVAIL Strange thing is, that for more than 3 month there was no single error logged with any drive. IIRC, before u4 I''ve seen occasionaly a bad checksum error message, but this was obviously the result from the wellknown race condition of the marvell driver when havy writes took plac...

...c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0...

Just look at this. I thought all the restarting resilver bugs were fixed, but it looks like something odd is still happening at the start: Status immediately after starting resilver: # zpool status pool: rc-pool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine

...0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0...

...state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM backup ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t9d0 ONLINE...

...c8t35d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-5 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t9d0...

...ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > spares > > c4t4d0 AVAIL > > c7t4d0 AVAIL

...only 12 of them all populated - system has three AOC-SAT2-MV8 cards plugged into 6 mini-sas backplanes - card1 ("c3") - bp1 (c3t0d0, c3t1d0) - bp2 (c3t4d0, c3t5d0) - card2 ("c4") - bp1 (c4t0d0, c4t1d0) - bp2 (c4t4d0, c4t5d0) - card3 ("c5") - bp1 (c5t0d0, c5t1d0) - bp2 (c5t4d0, c5t5d0) - system has one Barcelona Opteron (step BA) - the one with the potential look-aside cache bug... - though its not clear this is related... My First Thought To...

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

...#39;'zpool replace''. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P scrub: resilver in progress, 4.66% done, 12h16m to go config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM bigpool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ON...

...ith 8gig of ram and two Sun SAS controllers, attached two sas-jbods with 8 SATA-HDDs each und created a zfs pool as a raid 10 by doing something like the following: [i]zpool create zfs_raid10_16_disks mirror c3t0d0 c4t0d0 mirror c3t1d0 c4t1d0 mirror c3t2d0 c4t2d0 mirror c3t3d0 c4t3d0 mirror c3t4d0 c4t4d0 mirror c3t5d0 c4t5d0 mirror c3t6d0 c4t6d0 mirror c3t7d0 c4t7d0[/i] the i set "noatime" and ran the following filebench tests: [i] root at sun1 # ./filebench filebench> load fileserver 12746: 7.445: FileServer Version 1.14 2005/06/21 21:18:52 personality successfully loaded 12746: 7...

Hello. We''re currently using a Sun Blade1000 (2x750MHz, 1G ram, 2x160MB/s mpt scsi buses, skge GigE network) as a NFS backend with ZFS for distribution of free software like Debian (cdimage.debian.org, ftp.se.debian.org) and have run into some performance issues. We are running SX snv_48 and have run with a raidz2 with 7x300G for a while now, just added another 7x300G raidz2 today but