search for: c4t2d0

I have seen conflicting examples on how to create zpools using full disks. The zpool(1M) page uses "c0t0d0" but OpenSolaris Bible and others show "c0t0d0p0". E.g.: zpool create tank raidz c0t0d0 c0t1d0 c0t2d0 c0t3d0 c0t4d0 c0t5d0 zpool create tank raidz c0t0d0p0 c0t1d0p0 c0t2d0p0 c0t3d0p0 c0t4d0p0 c0t5d0p0 I have not been able to find any discussion on whether (or when) to

...: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rc-pool DEGRADED 0 0 0 mirror DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 5.56M resilvered replacing DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4t2d0s0/o FAULTED 1.71M 23.3M 0 too many errors c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 5.43M resilvered c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 5.55M resilvered And a few minutes later: # zpool status pool: rc-pool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has...

...data1 UNAVAIL insufficient replicas raidz1 UNAVAIL insufficient replicas c0t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c0t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c1t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c1t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c4t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c4t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c5t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c6t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c6t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data spare DEGRADED c7t2d0 UNAVAIL cannot open...

Hi, once I created a zpool of single vdevs not using mirroring of any kind. Now I wonder if it''s possible to add vdevs and mirror the currently existing ones. Thanks, budy -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

...NE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 replacing DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4t6d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0...

...0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0...

...he process of replacing a raidz1 of four 500GB drives with four 1.5TB drives on the third one I ran into an interesting issue. The process was to remove the old drive, put the new drive in and let it rebuild. The problem was the third drive I put in had a hardware fault. That caused both drives (c4t2d0) to show as FAULTED. I couldn''t put a new 1.5TB drive in as a replacement - it''d still show as a faulted drive. I couldn''t remove the faulted since you can''t remove a drive without enough replicas. You also can''t do anything to a pool in the process of...

...ly be reopened but I post it here since some people where seeing something similar. Example and attached zdb output: filer01a:/$ uname -a SunOS filer01a 5.11 snv_130 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris filer01a:/$ zpool create zpool01 raidz2 c4t0d0 c4t1d0 c4t2d0 c4t4d0 c4t5d0 c4t6d0 filer01a:/$ zpool create zpool01 raidz2 c4t0d0 c4t1d0 c4t2d0 c4t4d0 c4t5d0 c4t6d0 filer01a:/$ zfs list zpool01 NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zpool01 123K 5.33T 42.0K /zpool01 filer01a:/$ df -h /zpool01...

...20 19 1.57M 824K c5t1d1 - - 20 24 1.40M 838K c8t227C0001559A761Bd0 - - 5 101 403K 4.63M mirror 618G 78.3G 133 60 6.23M 361K c6t3d2 - - 40 27 3.21M 903K c4t2d0 - - 23 81 1.91M 2.98M c8t221200015599F2CFd0 - - 6 108 442K 4.71M mirror 613G 83.2G 110 51 3.66M 337K c6t3d3 - - 36 25 2.72M 906K c5t2d1 -...

...FS-8000-2Q scrub: resilver completed after 0h0m with 0 errors on Mon Nov 24 20:06:48 2008 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypooladas DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t8d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot o...

...c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE...

...zpool status is not effected under opensolaris root at yoda:~/bin# zpool status pool: backup state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM backup ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t8d0 ONLINE...

...c8t33d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t34d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t35d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-5 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-6...

...t; c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t3d0 ONLINE...

...c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0 ON...

(i use the term loosely because i know that zfs likes whole volumes better) when installing ubuntu, i got in the habit of using a separate partition for my home directory so that my data and gnome settings would all remain intact when i reinstalled or upgraded. i''m running osol 2008.11 on an ultra 20, which has only two drives. i''ve got all my data located in my home directory,

Well this is a new one.... Illumos/Openindiana let me add a device as a hot spare that evidently has a different sector alignment than all of the other drives in the array. So now I''m at the point that I /need/ a hot spare and it doesn''t look like I have it. And, worse, the other spares I have are all the same model as said hot spare. Is there anything I can do with this or

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

...stalled the latest Solaris 10 on a x4200 with 8gig of ram and two Sun SAS controllers, attached two sas-jbods with 8 SATA-HDDs each und created a zfs pool as a raid 10 by doing something like the following: [i]zpool create zfs_raid10_16_disks mirror c3t0d0 c4t0d0 mirror c3t1d0 c4t1d0 mirror c3t2d0 c4t2d0 mirror c3t3d0 c4t3d0 mirror c3t4d0 c4t4d0 mirror c3t5d0 c4t5d0 mirror c3t6d0 c4t6d0 mirror c3t7d0 c4t7d0[/i] the i set "noatime" and ran the following filebench tests: [i] root at sun1 # ./filebench filebench> load fileserver 12746: 7.445: FileServer Version 1.14 2005/06/21 21:18:5...

Hello. We''re currently using a Sun Blade1000 (2x750MHz, 1G ram, 2x160MB/s mpt scsi buses, skge GigE network) as a NFS backend with ZFS for distribution of free software like Debian (cdimage.debian.org, ftp.se.debian.org) and have run into some performance issues. We are running SX snv_48 and have run with a raidz2 with 7x300G for a while now, just added another 7x300G raidz2 today but