search for: c2t3d0

...ion: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-5E config: moonside FAULTED corrupted data raidz1 FAULTED corrupted data c2t0d0 ONLINE c2t1d0 ONLINE c2t2d0 ONLINE c2t3d0 ONLINE c2t4d0 FAULTED corrupted data c2t5d0 ONLINE c2t6d0 ONLINE Thanks, ZFS. One disk (at most, one disk and attempting to use a different SCSI connector) blew up my RAID-Z1. That''s...wonderful. I try rebooting to see if it becomes less confused...

1. I have a 4x18GB drive setup as RAIDZ. Now when thinking about it in terms of RAID5 I would expect to get (4-1)x18 worth of drive space, but DF -h shows 4x18. Is this a bug or do I not understand? 2. Once again thinking in RAID5 terms if I have 4X18GB and 12X9GB drives and I want to make a RAIDZ of all of them I would expect the 18GB to be treated at 9GB so the RAIDZ would be 16X9GB. Is

Hi there, i''m building a small NAS with 5x1TB Disks. The disks contains at the moment some data, ntfs as the fs and aren''t a raid. Now my im wondering if its possible to add the parity later. So that i add step by step one disk to the pool. And when i add the last disk, i enable the parity. (i have only one another 1 tb disk to backup the files) Thank you for you replies and

...graded state. action: Replace the device using ''zpool replace''. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-4J scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM testpool DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1-0 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d1 UNAVAIL 9 132 0 experienced I/O failures spares c2t3d2 AVAIL errors: No known data errors

...d with 0 errors on Wed Mar 7 10:57:05 2007 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0...

...NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM pool1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 .... c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares...

In my testing, I''ve found the following error: zpool status -v pool: local state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the entire pool from backup. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-8A scrub: none requested

...te: ONLINE status: ONLINE scrub: scrub completed with 0 errors on Sun Jul 15 10:58:33 2007 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t9d0 ONLINE 0...

Hello, I have a Dell 2950 with a Perc 5/i, two 300GB 15K SAS drives in a RAID0 array. I am considering going to ZFS and I would like to get some feedback about which situation would yield the highest performance: using the Perc 5/i to provide a hardware RAID0 that is presented as a single volume to OpenSolaris, or using the drives separately and creating the RAID0 with OpenSolaris and ZFS? Or

...0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz DEGRADED 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 UNAVAIL 42 63 0 cannot open errors: No known data errors And below is some info from /var/adm/messages: Aug 29 12:42:08 localhost marvell88sx: [ID 812917 kern.warning] WARNING: marvell88sx...

...er, though some features will not be available without an explicit ''zpool upgrade''. config: z ONLINE raidz1 ONLINE c1t1d0 ONLINE c2t1d0 ONLINE c1t6d0 ONLINE c1t4d0 ONLINE c2t3d0 ONLINE raidz1 ONLINE c2t4d0 ONLINE c2t6d0 ONLINE c1t3d0 ONLINE c2t5d0 ONLINE c1t5d0 ONLINE ssh access available. how does one free segment(offset=77984887808 size=66560) on a pool that won''t import?

...STATE READ WRITE CKSUM NOTE local ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 Internal SATA on left side c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 Internal SATA on right side c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 External SATA disk 1 in box on top c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 External SATA disk 2 in box on top spares c2t5d0 AVAIL External SATA disk 3 in box on top errors: No known data errors The above wou...

I have a lot of people whispering "zfs" in my virtual ear these days, and at the same time I have an irrational attachment to xfs based entirely on its lack of the 32000 subdirectory limit. I''m not afraid of ext4''s newness, since really a lot of that stuff has been in Lustre for years. So a-benchmarking I went. Results at the bottom:

Where can I find a list of supported multipath drivers for ZFS? Keith McAndrew Senior Systems Engineer Northern California SUN Microsystems - Data Management Group <mailto:Keith.McAndrew at SUN.com> Keith.McAndrew at SUN.com 916 715 8352 Cell CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information of SUN

...ZFS-8000-9P scrub: resilver completed after 1h7m with 0 errors on Fri Jan 9 09:57:46 2009 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM backup ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 5 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 1 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 1 0 c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 2 0 c2t6d0 ONLINE 0 2 0 c2t7d0 ONLINE 0 2 0 c2t8d0 ONLINE 0 3 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0...

I was trying to simply test bandwidth that Solaris/ZFS (Nevada b63) can deliver from a drive, and doing this: dd if=(raw disk) of=/dev/null gives me around 80MB/s, while dd if=(file on ZFS) of=/dev/null gives me only 35MB/s!?. I am getting basically the same result whether it is single zfs drive, mirror or a stripe (I am testing with two Seagate 7200.10 320G drives hanging off the same interface

I currently have a 7x1.5tb raidz1. I want to add "phase 2" which is another 7x1.5tb raidz1 Can I add the second phase to the first phase and basically have two raid5''s striped (in raid terms?) Yes, I probably should upgrade the zpool format too. Currently running snv_104. Also should upgrade to 110. If that is possible, would anyone happen to have the simple command lines to