search for: c2t2d0

...OOT export 254G 230K 254G 0% ONLINE - root # echo |format Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c2t0d0 <DEFAULT cyl 35497 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 7b,0/pci1022,7458 at 11/pci1000,3060 at 2/sd at 0,0 1. c2t2d0 <DEFAULT cyl 35497 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 7b,0/pci1022,7458 at 11/pci1000,3060 at 2/sd at 2,0 Specify disk (enter its number): Specify disk (enter its number): :root # zpool create export mirror c2t0d0s5 c2t2d0s5 invalid vdev specification use ''-f'' to ov...

...it literally took over 5 minutes to give me console login. Commands took at least 5s between being typed and appearing in console - it was obvious something insane was going on. Load average was 6.33, and fmd was taking most of the CPU. zpool status took about 10 minutes to tell me that it thought c2t2d0 was missing and that c2t4d0 was corrupt, thereby screwing me. Wait, what. I didn''t touch that disk, what''s going on here. I try to convince ZFS that the disk is there and usable via zpool online moonside c2t2d0, but it just claims the pool is inaccessable (great, thanks ZFS). I...

Hi, yesterday evening I tried to upgrade my Ultra 60 to 2009.06 from SXCE snv_98. I can''t use AI Installer because OpenPROM is version 3.27. So I built IPS from source, then created a zpool on a spare drive and installed OS 2006.06 on it To make the disk bootable I used: installboot -F zfs /usr/platform/`uname -i`/lib/fs/zfs/bootblk /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s0 using the executable from my new

If it''s of interest, I''ve written up some articles on my experiences of building a ZFS NAS box which you can read here: http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/ I used CIFS to share the filesystems, but it will be a simple matter to use NFS instead: issue the command ''zfs set sharenfs=on pool/filesystem'' instead of ''zfs set

1. I have a 4x18GB drive setup as RAIDZ. Now when thinking about it in terms of RAID5 I would expect to get (4-1)x18 worth of drive space, but DF -h shows 4x18. Is this a bug or do I not understand? 2. Once again thinking in RAID5 terms if I have 4X18GB and 12X9GB drives and I want to make a RAIDZ of all of them I would expect the 18GB to be treated at 9GB so the RAIDZ would be 16X9GB. Is

...My setup: Compaq DL380 Host OS: CentOS 4.3 (x86) VMware Server Guest OS: Solaris Nevada Build 39 Host Memory: 4GB Guest Memory: 1.5GB Disks: 3 x 300GB Seagate SATA II drives (with ~25GB carved out of each for the Host OS) -- The commands I ran: [b]bash-3.00# zpool create sata raidz c2t0d0 c2t1d0 c2t2d0 bash-3.00# zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT sata 838G 108K 838G 0% ONLINE - bash-3.00# zpool status pool: sata state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM...

Hi there, i''m building a small NAS with 5x1TB Disks. The disks contains at the moment some data, ntfs as the fs and aren''t a raid. Now my im wondering if its possible to add the parity later. So that i add step by step one disk to the pool. And when i add the last disk, i enable the parity. (i have only one another 1 tb disk to backup the files) Thank you for you replies and

...0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t0d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open errors: No known data errors James Dickens uadmin.blogspot.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.op...

In my testing, I''ve found the following error: zpool status -v pool: local state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the entire pool from backup. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-8A scrub: none requested

Where can I find a list of supported multipath drivers for ZFS? Keith McAndrew Senior Systems Engineer Northern California SUN Microsystems - Data Management Group <mailto:Keith.McAndrew at SUN.com> Keith.McAndrew at SUN.com 916 715 8352 Cell CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information of SUN

Hello, I have a Dell 2950 with a Perc 5/i, two 300GB 15K SAS drives in a RAID0 array. I am considering going to ZFS and I would like to get some feedback about which situation would yield the highest performance: using the Perc 5/i to provide a hardware RAID0 that is presented as a single volume to OpenSolaris, or using the drives separately and creating the RAID0 with OpenSolaris and ZFS? Or

...0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz DEGRADED 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 UNAVAIL 42 63 0 cannot open errors: No known data errors And below is some info from /var/adm/messages: Aug 29 12:42:08 localhost marvell88sx...

...sata state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM sata ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors bash-3.00# zfs list sata/data NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT sata/data 16.9G 533G 16.9G /data[/b] Error: [b]Jun 13 19:33:01 mathrock-opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: lofi0 Jun 1...

...mpleted with 0 errors on Sun Sep 23 04:16:33 2007 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM NOTE local ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 Internal SATA on left side c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 Internal SATA on right side c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 External SATA disk 1 in box on top c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 External SATA disk 2 in box on top spares c2t5d0 AVAIL Ext...

I have a lot of people whispering "zfs" in my virtual ear these days, and at the same time I have an irrational attachment to xfs based entirely on its lack of the 32000 subdirectory limit. I''m not afraid of ext4''s newness, since really a lot of that stuff has been in Lustre for years. So a-benchmarking I went. Results at the bottom:

...place''. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P scrub: resilver completed after 1h7m with 0 errors on Fri Jan 9 09:57:46 2009 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM backup ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 5 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 1 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 1 0 c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 2 0 c2t6d0 ONLINE 0 2 0 c2t7d0 ONLINE 0 2 0 c2t8d0 ONLINE 0...

I was trying to simply test bandwidth that Solaris/ZFS (Nevada b63) can deliver from a drive, and doing this: dd if=(raw disk) of=/dev/null gives me around 80MB/s, while dd if=(file on ZFS) of=/dev/null gives me only 35MB/s!?. I am getting basically the same result whether it is single zfs drive, mirror or a stripe (I am testing with two Seagate 7200.10 320G drives hanging off the same interface

I currently have a 7x1.5tb raidz1. I want to add "phase 2" which is another 7x1.5tb raidz1 Can I add the second phase to the first phase and basically have two raid5''s striped (in raid terms?) Yes, I probably should upgrade the zpool format too. Currently running snv_104. Also should upgrade to 110. If that is possible, would anyone happen to have the simple command lines to