search for: c2t1d0

...e old value. I tryed zpool export and zpool import but it didn''t resolve my problem. bash-3.00# format Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c0d1 <DEFAULT cyl 6523 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci-ide at 1,1/ide at 0/cmdk at 1,0 1. c2t1d0 <NETAPP-LUN-7340-22.00GB> /iscsi/disk at 0000iqn.1992-08.com.netapp%3Asn.13510595203E9,0 Specify disk (enter its number): ^C bash-3.00# zpool list NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CAP HEALTH ALTROOT TEST 9,94G 93K 9,94G 0% ONLINE - What can I do that zpool show ne...

...drive. My setup: Compaq DL380 Host OS: CentOS 4.3 (x86) VMware Server Guest OS: Solaris Nevada Build 39 Host Memory: 4GB Guest Memory: 1.5GB Disks: 3 x 300GB Seagate SATA II drives (with ~25GB carved out of each for the Host OS) -- The commands I ran: [b]bash-3.00# zpool create sata raidz c2t0d0 c2t1d0 c2t2d0 bash-3.00# zpool list NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT sata 838G 108K 838G 0% ONLINE - bash-3.00# zpool status pool: sata state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM...

...atus: One or more devices contains corrupted data. action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-5E config: moonside FAULTED corrupted data raidz1 FAULTED corrupted data c2t0d0 ONLINE c2t1d0 ONLINE c2t2d0 ONLINE c2t3d0 ONLINE c2t4d0 FAULTED corrupted data c2t5d0 ONLINE c2t6d0 ONLINE Thanks, ZFS. One disk (at most, one disk and attempting to use a different SCSI connector) blew up my RAID-Z1. That''s...wonderfu...

If it''s of interest, I''ve written up some articles on my experiences of building a ZFS NAS box which you can read here: http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/ I used CIFS to share the filesystems, but it will be a simple matter to use NFS instead: issue the command ''zfs set sharenfs=on pool/filesystem'' instead of ''zfs set

I was trying to simply test bandwidth that Solaris/ZFS (Nevada b63) can deliver from a drive, and doing this: dd if=(raw disk) of=/dev/null gives me around 80MB/s, while dd if=(file on ZFS) of=/dev/null gives me only 35MB/s!?. I am getting basically the same result whether it is single zfs drive, mirror or a stripe (I am testing with two Seagate 7200.10 320G drives hanging off the same interface

I have a lot of people whispering "zfs" in my virtual ear these days, and at the same time I have an irrational attachment to xfs based entirely on its lack of the 32000 subdirectory limit. I''m not afraid of ext4''s newness, since really a lot of that stuff has been in Lustre for years. So a-benchmarking I went. Results at the bottom:

...n.com/msg/ZFS-8000-D3 scrub: resilver completed with 0 errors on Wed Mar 7 10:57:05 2007 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0...

In my testing, I''ve found the following error: zpool status -v pool: local state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the entire pool from backup. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-8A scrub: none requested

...resolved the I/O problems and have a healthy zpool: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM archive ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d4 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d5 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d3 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d7 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d3 ONLINE 0...

1. I have a 4x18GB drive setup as RAIDZ. Now when thinking about it in terms of RAID5 I would expect to get (4-1)x18 worth of drive space, but DF -h shows 4x18. Is this a bug or do I not understand? 2. Once again thinking in RAID5 terms if I have 4X18GB and 12X9GB drives and I want to make a RAIDZ of all of them I would expect the 18GB to be treated at 9GB so the RAIDZ would be 16X9GB. Is

Hello, I have a Dell 2950 with a Perc 5/i, two 300GB 15K SAS drives in a RAID0 array. I am considering going to ZFS and I would like to get some feedback about which situation would yield the highest performance: using the Perc 5/i to provide a hardware RAID0 that is presented as a single volume to OpenSolaris, or using the drives separately and creating the RAID0 with OpenSolaris and ZFS? Or

...0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz DEGRADED 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 UNAVAIL 42 63 0 cannot open errors: No known data errors And below is some info from /var/adm/m...

...disks. [b]bash-3.00# zpool status sata pool: sata state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM sata ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors bash-3.00# zfs list sata/data NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT sata/data 16.9G 533G 16.9G /data[/b] Error: [b]Jun 13 19:33:01 mathrock-opensolaris pseudo: [...

...which one was going to be at the top of the totem pole. From now on I only want JBOD! Works even better when I export each disk in my array as a single raid0 x14 then create the zpool :) #zpool create -f vol0 c2t1d12 c2t1d11 c2t1d10 c2t1d9 c2t1d8 c2t1d7 c2t1d6 c2t1d5 c2t1d4 c2t1d3 c2t1d2 c2t1d1 c2t1d0 spare c2t1d13 > >> The storedge shelf has 14 FC 72gb disks attached to a solaris snv_68. >> >> I was thinking that since I cant export all the disks un-raided out to the >> solaris system that I would instead: >> >> (on the 6130) >> Create 3 raid5 vol...

...0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open errors: No known data errors This message posted from opensolaris.org

...on-disk version. action: The pool can be imported using its name or numeric identifier, though some features will not be available without an explicit ''zpool upgrade''. config: z ONLINE raidz1 ONLINE c1t1d0 ONLINE c2t1d0 ONLINE c1t6d0 ONLINE c1t4d0 ONLINE c2t3d0 ONLINE raidz1 ONLINE c2t4d0 ONLINE c2t6d0 ONLINE c1t3d0 ONLINE c2t5d0 ONLINE c1t5d0 ONLINE ssh access available. how does one fr...

...0 61.9M 0 c0t1d0s7 - - 1.02K 0 61.9M 0 c0t2d0s7 - - 1.02K 0 62.0M 0 c0t3d0s7 - - 1.02K 0 62.0M 0 c1t0d0s7 - - 1.01K 0 61.9M 0 c2t0d0s7 - - 1.02K 0 62.0M 0 c2t1d0s7 - - 1.02K 0 61.9M 0 ------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- "iostat -Mnx 2" extended device statistics r/s w/s Mr/s Mw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 1044.8 0.5 61.7 0.0 0.1 14.3 0.1 13.6 4...

...: 114942 pages dumped, compression ratio 4.24, dump succeeded rebooting... Format output ------------------ # format Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c2t0d0 <DEFAULT cyl 6527 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci15d9,1611 at 5/disk at 0,0 1. c2t1d0 <DEFAULT cyl 6527 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci15d9,1611 at 5/disk at 1,0 2. c3t0d0 <ATA-ST31000340NS-SN03-931.51GB> /pci at 0,0/pci10de,376 at a/pci1033,125 at 0/pci11ab,11ab at 4/disk at 0,0 3. c3t1d0 <ATA-ST31000340NS-SN03-931.51GB>...