search for: c0t1d0

...re devices are missing from the system. action: The pool cannot be imported. Attach the missing devices and try again. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-6X config: data UNAVAIL missing device raidz1 DEGRADED c0t0d0 ONLINE c0t1d0 ONLINE replacing ONLINE c0t2d0 ONLINE c0t7d0 ONLINE c0t3d0 UNAVAIL cannot open c0t4d0 ONLINE c0t5d0 ONLINE c0t6d0 ONLINE Additional devices are known to be part of this pool, t...

...led 03 June 2008 Installed from DVD as ZFS boot filesystems 1 SAN disk attached from IBM SVC using DS8300 storage. 2 - 1 port Qlogic cards attached to McData 6064 Directors Here''s my questions: 1. After the install I created a zfs mirror of the root disk c0t0d0 to c0t1d0, format shows the mirrored disk with sectors instead of cylinders, is this normal or correct? Is there a way to reverse this back to cylinders if it is not? Same goes for the external disk pool using SAN disk from the IBM SVC. 2. After enabled MPxIO (stmsboot -e), the 2 root disks now have MPxI...

I have seen conflicting examples on how to create zpools using full disks. The zpool(1M) page uses "c0t0d0" but OpenSolaris Bible and others show "c0t0d0p0". E.g.: zpool create tank raidz c0t0d0 c0t1d0 c0t2d0 c0t3d0 c0t4d0 c0t5d0 zpool create tank raidz c0t0d0p0 c0t1d0p0 c0t2d0p0 c0t3d0p0 c0t4d0p0 c0t5d0p0 I have not been able to find any discussion on whether (or when) to add the "p0" to the disk name while creating whole disk zpools. In my case, I will have 9 disks in Raid-Z3 (home...

...csi intiators I should switch over to 2008.05. I thought I would simply just be able to install 2008.05 over top of Sol10U5 and import / upgrade the pool and move on. Indeed I probably can do that, but it didn''t quite go as planned... So under U5, the boot devices (mirrored w/ SVM) were c0t1d0 and c5t0d0, I exported the zpool and rebooted. Through the ILOM''s Java console I mounted the 2008.05 iso and booted from it. When the OS came online, I quickly started the installer and selected the device labeled c0t1d0 to as the installation target.... this was rather stupid on my part...

...ol configuration: # zpool status -v pool: maxPool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM maxPool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0...

I have a 9-bay JBOD configured as a raidz2. One of the disks, which is on-line and fine, needs to be swapped out and replaced. I have been looking though the zfs admin guide and am confused on how I should go about swapping out. I though I could put the disk off-line, remove it, put a new disk in, and put on-line. Does this sound right? Any help would be great Thanks Chris This message

...e member driver of rpool. Infact, solaris2 partition can be more then one in each Hard Disk, so we also can use the RAW driver like : c0t0d0p1 (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0p1) ,c0t0d0p2 (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0p2) as the member driver to create a new zpool : Morpho at egoodbrac1:~# zpool create dpool raidz c0t0d0p1,c0t1d0,c0t2d0 This command can successful create a new raidz pool named dpool and c0t0d0p1 means the RAW drive of the first solaris2 partition of the system disk (c0t0d0),c0t1d0 and c0t2d0 is another 2 RAW disk. But ,If you understand , in logic the member driver of rpool c0t0d0s0 should same with c0t0d...

...0.0 5.8 0.8 15.8 75 80 capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read write read write ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- z 1.06T 3.81T 2.92K 0 360M 0 raidz1 564G 2.86T 1.51K 0 187M 0 c0t1d0 - - 457 0 47.3M 0 c1t1d0 - - 457 0 47.4M 0 c0t6d0 - - 456 0 47.4M 0 c0t4d0 - - 458 0 47.4M 0 c1t3d0 - - 463 0 47.3M 0 raidz1 518G 970G 1.40K 0 174M...

...sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP 16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ csmith-desktop,8G,,,190853,95,119364,42,,,245770,28,421.4,1,16,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++ zpool create internal c0t0d0 zpool add internal c0t1d0 zpool add internal c0t2d0 zpool add internal c0t3d0 zpool add internal c0t4d0 zpool add internal c0t5d0 zpool add internal c0t6d0 zpool add internal c0t7d0 ./bonnie++ -d /internal/ -s 8g -u0 -f Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- -Per...

...that it cannot open one of the replicas: # raidctl RAID Volume RAID RAID Disk Volume Type Status Disk Status ------------------------------------------------------ c0t0d0 IM OK c0t0d0 OK c0t1d0 OK c0t2d0 IM OK c0t2d0 OK c0t3d0 OK # zpool status -x pool: dpool state: FAULTED status: One or more devices could not be opened. There are insufficient replicas for the pool to continue functioning. acti...

...c0t0d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE...

...r Priority: P1 Component: other AssignedTo: ajscarp at yahoo.com ReportedBy: darrenm at opensolaris.org QAContact: hua.tang at sun.com CC: zfs-crypto-discuss at opensolaris.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 # zpool create -f tank mirror c0t0d0 c0t1d0 log c7t0d0 cache c6t0d0 # zpool set keysource=raw,file:///root/tank.key tank Invalid keysource change. # zpool key -l tank Key Load Error: Invalid keysource property value. However if a keysource was set at pool creation ''zpool set'' can perform the valid changes. # pktool gen...

...idz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2...

...12 hours ago and the x4500 is still down. I think they have it at single-user prompt resilvering again. (I also noticed they''d decided to break the mirror of the root disks for some very strange reason). It still shows: raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 replacing UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas c1t1d0s0/o OFFLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open So I am pretty sure it''ll hang again sometime soon. What...

OK, I''ve been putting off this question for a while now, but it eating at me, so I can''t hold off any more. I have a nice 8 gig memory stick I''ve formated with the ZFS file system. Works great on all my Solaris PC''s, but refuses to work on my Sparc processor. So I''ve formated it on my Sparc machine (Blade 2500), works great there now, but not on

...oks like this bash-3.00# zpool status pool: data1 state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0...

...0 0 0 c1t17d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t23d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-5 REMOVED 0 0 0 c1t20d0 REMOVED 0 0 0 c8t18d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 (resilvering) c1t21d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 logs c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c8t18d0 INUSE currently in use errors: No known data errors Thanks for any insights. -Scott -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

1. I have a 4x18GB drive setup as RAIDZ. Now when thinking about it in terms of RAID5 I would expect to get (4-1)x18 worth of drive space, but DF -h shows 4x18. Is this a bug or do I not understand? 2. Once again thinking in RAID5 terms if I have 4X18GB and 12X9GB drives and I want to make a RAIDZ of all of them I would expect the 18GB to be treated at 9GB so the RAIDZ would be 16X9GB. Is

...urations are not recommended. ZFS might work properly on such devices, but less-than-optimal performance might be the result".. so with this in mind. ZFS vs UFS/SVM: UFS File systems are created using SVM ZFS File systems are created using the disks. So using the same disks eg.... c0t0d0 / c0t1d0 / c0t2d0 / c0t3d0 1) Create STRIPE 2) Create Mirror 3) Create RAID-5 And run bunch of performance tests. We''re using SWAT for measuring I/O. -D This message posted from opensolaris.org

I updated an i386 system to b39 yesterday, and noticed this when running iostat: r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0.0 0.5 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0 0 c0t0d0 0.0 0.5 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0 0 c0t1d0 0.0 65.1 0.0 119640001.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 2 c0t2d0 0.0 65.1 0.0 119640090.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 2 c0t3d0 c0t2d0 and c0t3d0 are members of a ZFS pool, all other filesystems are UFS. the numbers for all non-ZFS disks are sane, and zpool iostat reports sane nu...