Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "c1t8d0".
Did you mean:
c1t0d0
2009 Dec 28
0
[storage-discuss] high read iops - more memory for arc?
...8.6? ?
> 0.0???69.1???1? 98
> c1t5d0
> >???406.3? ? 0.0? ?
> 1.8? ? 0.0? 0.0 32.1? ?
> 0.0???79.0???1 100 c1t6d0
> >???404.3? ? 0.0? ?
> 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 31.9? ?
> 0.0???78.8???1 100 c1t7d0
> >???404.1? ? 0.0? ?
> 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 34.0? ?
> 0.0???84.1???1 100 c1t8d0
> >???407.1? ? 0.0? ?
> 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 31.2? ?
> 0.0???76.6???1 100 c1t9d0
> >???407.5? ? 0.0? ?
> 2.0? ? 0.0? 0.0 33.2? ?
> 0.0???81.4???1 100 c1t10d0
> >???402.8? ? 0.0? ?
> 2.0? ? 0.0? 0.0 33.5? ?
> 0.0???83.2???1 100 c1t11d0
> >???408.9? ? 0.0? ?
>...
2009 Dec 24
1
high read iops - more memory for arc?
...33.0 0.0 81.3 1 100 c1t4d0
414.2 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 69.1 1 98 c1t5d0
406.3 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 79.0 1 100 c1t6d0
404.3 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 31.9 0.0 78.8 1 100 c1t7d0
404.1 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 84.1 1 100 c1t8d0
407.1 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 31.2 0.0 76.6 1 100 c1t9d0
407.5 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 33.2 0.0 81.4 1 100 c1t10d0
402.8 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 33.5 0.0 83.2 1 100 c1t11d0
408.9 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 32.8 0.0 80.3 1 100 c1t12d0
9.6 10.8 0.1...
2010 Sep 29
10
Resliver making the system unresponsive
...complete.
scan: resilver in progress since Wed Sep 29 14:03:52 2010
1.12T scanned out of 5.00T at 311M/s, 3h37m to go
82.0G resilvered, 22.42% done
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
data01 DEGRADED 0 0 0
raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t10d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t11d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t12d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t13d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t14d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2-...
2007 Jul 31
0
controller number mismatch
...1 0.1 1.1 1 5 c1t2d0
2.2 78.2 128.7 209.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 1 4 c1t3d0
1.8 81.2 107.4 217.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 1 5 c1t4d0
1.8 78.2 107.4 209.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 1 5 c1t5d0
0.5 53.7 32.0 106.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.6 0 3 c1t8d0
0.5 51.8 32.0 106.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.7 0 3 c1t9d0
0.2 52.5 10.7 106.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.3 0 3 c1t10d0
0.3 51.3 21.3 107.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.5 0 3 c1t11d0
0.3 52.3 21.3 107.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.7 0 3 c1t12d0
$ zpool iostat -v 6...
2007 Jul 18
1
Converting exisitng ZFS pool to MPxIO
...0
c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
I''ve done some testing with a v880 and ZFS seems to support MPxIO with no issues:
% zpool status
pool: data2
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE...
2010 Aug 19
0
Unable to mount legacy pool in to zone
...9;'ve inherited this solaris 10 system with a sun storedge attached.
pool: tol-pool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tol-pool ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t10d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
spare ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t11d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t13d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t12d...
2007 Jan 09
2
ZFS Hot Spare Behavior
I physically removed a disk (c3t8d0 used by ZFS ''pool01'') from a 3310 JBOD connected to a V210 running s10u3 (11/06) and ''zpool status'' reported this:
# zpool status
pool: pool01
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices could not be opened. Sufficient replicas exist for
the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state.
action: Attach the
2009 Mar 28
53
Can this be done?
I currently have a 7x1.5tb raidz1.
I want to add "phase 2" which is another 7x1.5tb raidz1
Can I add the second phase to the first phase and basically have two
raid5''s striped (in raid terms?)
Yes, I probably should upgrade the zpool format too. Currently running
snv_104. Also should upgrade to 110.
If that is possible, would anyone happen to have the simple command
lines to