search for: c1t4d0

...to set up a RAIDZ for the 750 GB and mirror for the 320 GB and add it all to the same pool. I tested detaching a drive and it seems to seriously mess up the entire pool and I can''t figure out a way to recover. # zpool create mypool raidz c1t1d0 c1t2d0 c1t3d0 # zpool add -f mypool mirror c1t4d0 c1t5d0 # zpool status pool: mypool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 O...

Hi, Is it possible to convert a zfs pool from a concatenation of 2 disks to a 2 way mirror without backing up the data, re-creating the pool and restoring it. i.e diskA,diskB ----> mirror(diskA,diskB) Thanks, Jeff

New server build with Solaris-10 u5/08, on a SunFire t5220, and this is our first rollout of ZFS and Zpools. Have 8 disks, boot disk is hardware mirrored (c1t0d0 + c1t1d0) Created Zpool my_pool as RaidZ using 5 disks + 1 spare: c1t2d0, c1t3d0, c1t4d0, c1t5d0, c1t6d0, and spare c1t7d0 I am working on alerting & recovery plans for disks failures in the zpool. As a test, I have pulled disk c1t6d0, to see what a disk failure will look like. "zpool status -v mypool" Still reports disk c1t6d0 as ONLINE. "iostat -En" also does...

...0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0...

...- 457 0 47.3M 0 c1t1d0 - - 457 0 47.4M 0 c0t6d0 - - 456 0 47.4M 0 c0t4d0 - - 458 0 47.4M 0 c1t3d0 - - 463 0 47.3M 0 raidz1 518G 970G 1.40K 0 174M 0 c1t4d0 - - 434 0 44.7M 0 c1t6d0 - - 433 0 45.3M 0 c0t3d0 - - 445 0 45.3M 0 c1t5d0 - - 427 0 44.4M 0 c0t5d0 - - 424 0 44.3M 0 ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----...

...add internal c0t1d0 zpool add internal c0t2d0 zpool add internal c0t3d0 zpool add internal c0t4d0 zpool add internal c0t5d0 zpool add internal c0t6d0 zpool add internal c0t7d0 zpool add internal c1t0d0 zpool add internal c1t1d0 zpool add internal c1t2d0 zpool add internal c1t3d0 zpool add internal c1t4d0 zpool add internal c1t5d0 zpool add internal c1t6d0 zpool add internal c1t7d0 ./bonnie++ -d /internal/ -s 8g -u0 -f Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/...

Hi there, i''m building a small NAS with 5x1TB Disks. The disks contains at the moment some data, ntfs as the fs and aren''t a raid. Now my im wondering if its possible to add the parity later. So that i add step by step one disk to the pool. And when i add the last disk, i enable the parity. (i have only one another 1 tb disk to backup the files) Thank you for you replies and

...idz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2...

Ciao, the rot filesystem of my thumper is a ZFS with a single disk: bash-3.2# zpool status rpool pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c0t7d0 AVAIL c1t6d0 AVAIL c1t7d0

...1.5? ? > 0.0???78.5???1 100 c1t1d0 > >???421.2? ? 0.0? ? > 2.0? ? 0.0? 0.0 30.4? ? > 0.0???72.3???1? 98 > c1t2d0 > >???403.9? ? 0.0? ? > 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 32.0? ? > 0.0???79.2???1 100 c1t3d0 > >???406.7? ? 0.0? ? > 2.0? ? 0.0? 0.0 33.0? ? > 0.0???81.3???1 100 c1t4d0 > >???414.2? ? 0.0? ? > 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 28.6? ? > 0.0???69.1???1? 98 > c1t5d0 > >???406.3? ? 0.0? ? > 1.8? ? 0.0? 0.0 32.1? ? > 0.0???79.0???1 100 c1t6d0 > >???404.3? ? 0.0? ? > 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 31.9? ? > 0.0???78.8???1 100 c1t7d0 > >???404.1? ? 0.0? ? &g...

...0.0 0.0 16.0 0 1 c1t0d0 401.7 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 31.5 0.0 78.5 1 100 c1t1d0 421.2 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 30.4 0.0 72.3 1 98 c1t2d0 403.9 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 32.0 0.0 79.2 1 100 c1t3d0 406.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 33.0 0.0 81.3 1 100 c1t4d0 414.2 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 69.1 1 98 c1t5d0 406.3 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 79.0 1 100 c1t6d0 404.3 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 31.9 0.0 78.8 1 100 c1t7d0 404.1 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 84.1 1 100 c1t8d0 407.1 0.0 1.9 0....

...0 c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0...

Hi, I wanted to add a disk to the tank pool to create a mirror. I accidentally used zpool add ? instead of zpool attach ? and now the disk is added. Is there a way to remove the disk without loosing data? Or maybe change it to mirror? Thanks, Martijn -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

I was recently evaluating much the same question but with out only a single pool and sizing my disks equally. I only need about 500GB of usable space and so I was considering the value of 4x 250GB SATA Drives versus 5x 160GB SATA drives. I had intended to use an AMS 5 disk in 3 5.25" bay hot-swap backplane. http://www.american-media.com/product/backplane/sata300/sata300.html I priced

...1 0.1 1.4 1 6 c1t0d0 2.0 76.8 118.1 208.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.2 1 4 c1t1d0 1.7 79.0 106.7 216.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 1 5 c1t2d0 2.2 78.2 128.7 209.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 1 4 c1t3d0 1.8 81.2 107.4 217.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 1 5 c1t4d0 1.8 78.2 107.4 209.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 1 5 c1t5d0 0.5 53.7 32.0 106.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.6 0 3 c1t8d0 0.5 51.8 32.0 106.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.7 0 3 c1t9d0 0.2 52.5 10.7 106.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.3 0 3 c1t10d0 0.3 51.3 21.3...

...c1t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors Now I want to add two more mirrors to that pool because the V880 has more drives to offer, that are not used at the moment. So I''d like to add in a mirror of c1t1d0 and c1t4d0 : # zpool add -f neptune_rpool c1t1d0 cannot label ''c1t1d0'': EFI labeled devices are not supported on root pools. OKay .. I can live with that. # prtvtoc -h /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0 | fmthard -s - /dev/rdsk/c1t1d0s0 fmthard: New volume table of contents now in place. # prtvtoc -h /d...

...data DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 spare DEGRADED 0 0 2.89M c0t1d0 REMOVED 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 59.3G resilvered...

...fig: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 I''ve done some testing with a v880 and ZFS seems to support MPxIO with no...

...c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ON...

...fig: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz DEGRADED 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0...