search for: c1t1d0

...uot;zpool status poolname" to determine component disks, if you don''t already know those details: # zpool status pool: pool state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM pool ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors pool: rpool state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors...

Hi, When deploying ZFS in cluster environment it would be nice to be able to have some SSDs as local drives (not on SAN) and when pool switches over to the other node zfs would pick up the node''s local disk drives as L2ARC. To better clarify what I mean lets assume there is a 2-node cluster with 1sx 2540 disk array. Now lets put 4x SSDs in each node (as internal/local drives). Now

...es and 2x 320 GB hard drives available, and I want to set up a RAIDZ for the 750 GB and mirror for the 320 GB and add it all to the same pool. I tested detaching a drive and it seems to seriously mess up the entire pool and I can''t figure out a way to recover. # zpool create mypool raidz c1t1d0 c1t2d0 c1t3d0 # zpool add -f mypool mirror c1t4d0 c1t5d0 # zpool status pool: mypool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0...

...0 c1t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors Now I want to add two more mirrors to that pool because the V880 has more drives to offer, that are not used at the moment. So I''d like to add in a mirror of c1t1d0 and c1t4d0 : # zpool add -f neptune_rpool c1t1d0 cannot label ''c1t1d0'': EFI labeled devices are not supported on root pools. OKay .. I can live with that. # prtvtoc -h /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0 | fmthard -s - /dev/rdsk/c1t1d0s0 fmthard: New volume table of contents now in place. # pr...

Hi, Given two disk c1t0d0 (DISK A) and c1t1d0 (DISK B)... 1/ Standard install on DISK A. 2/ zfs boot install on DISK B. 3/ I change the boot order and my zfs boot works fine. 4/ I install grub on the mbr of DISK B 5/ I disconnect and replace DISK A with DISK B 6/ Reboot, get the grub menu select Solaris ZFS and it panics that it cannot mo...

...0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0...

I intended to add a disk as a hot spare to a zpool but inadvertently added as an equal partner of the entire pool. i.e. zpool add ataarchive c1t1d0 instead of zpool add ataarchive spare c1t1d0 This is a zpool on an X4500 with 4 raidz2''s configured. From my reading of previous threads, the ZFS FAQ and the wikipedia entry, it looks as though the only way I can remove the disk now is to destroy the zpool and then rebuild it. Is this s...

...d: No space left on device collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [bin/ntlm_auth] Error 1 --- end snip --- WOW! Look at this! bash-2.05# df -h /<path_to_samba_source> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /<path_to_samba_source> 944M 929M 0 100% /usr/c1t1d0 --- BUT, after a make clean: /<path_to_samba_source> 944M 29M 858M 4% /usr/c1t1d0

...ty operations bandwidth pool used avail read write read write ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- z 1.06T 3.81T 2.92K 0 360M 0 raidz1 564G 2.86T 1.51K 0 187M 0 c0t1d0 - - 457 0 47.3M 0 c1t1d0 - - 457 0 47.4M 0 c0t6d0 - - 456 0 47.4M 0 c0t4d0 - - 458 0 47.4M 0 c1t3d0 - - 463 0 47.3M 0 raidz1 518G 970G 1.40K 0 174M 0 c1t4d0 - - 434 0 44.7M...

If it''s of interest, I''ve written up some articles on my experiences of building a ZFS NAS box which you can read here: http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/ I used CIFS to share the filesystems, but it will be a simple matter to use NFS instead: issue the command ''zfs set sharenfs=on pool/filesystem'' instead of ''zfs set

...c1t0d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE...

As mentioned last night, we''ve been reviewing a proposal for hot spare support in ZFS. Below you can find a current draft of the proposed interfaces. This has not yet been submitted for ARC review, but comments are welcome. Note that this does not include any enhanced FMA diagnosis to determine when a device is "faulted". This will come in a follow-on project, of which some

New server build with Solaris-10 u5/08, on a SunFire t5220, and this is our first rollout of ZFS and Zpools. Have 8 disks, boot disk is hardware mirrored (c1t0d0 + c1t1d0) Created Zpool my_pool as RaidZ using 5 disks + 1 spare: c1t2d0, c1t3d0, c1t4d0, c1t5d0, c1t6d0, and spare c1t7d0 I am working on alerting & recovery plans for disks failures in the zpool. As a test, I have pulled disk c1t6d0, to see what a disk failure will look like. "zpool status -v...

...++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++ zpool create internal c0t0d0 zpool add internal c0t1d0 zpool add internal c0t2d0 zpool add internal c0t3d0 zpool add internal c0t4d0 zpool add internal c0t5d0 zpool add internal c0t6d0 zpool add internal c0t7d0 zpool add internal c1t0d0 zpool add internal c1t1d0 zpool add internal c1t2d0 zpool add internal c1t3d0 zpool add internal c1t4d0 zpool add internal c1t5d0 zpool add internal c1t6d0 zpool add internal c1t7d0 ./bonnie++ -d /internal/ -s 8g -u0 -f Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- -Per...

...c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0...

...the root volume from an existing svm mirror to a zfs root. The machine is a Sun V880 (SPARC) running nv_96, with OBP version 4.22.34 which is AFAICT the latest. The svm mirror was constructed as follows / d4 m 18GB d14 d14 s 35GB c1t0d0s0 d24 s 35GB c1t1d0s0 swap d3 m 16GB d13 d13 s 16GB c1t0d0s3 d13 s 16GB c1t1d0s3 /var d5 m 8.0GB d15 d15 s 16GB c1t0d0s1 d25 s 16GB c1t1d0s1 I removed c1t1d0 from the mirror: # metadetach d4 d24 # metaclear d24 # metadetach...

...gt; 0.0? ? 0.0???0???0 > c0t0d0 > >? > 4898.3???34.2???23.2? > ? 1.4? 0.1 385.3? ? > 0.0???78.1???0 1246 c1 > >? ???0.0? ? 0.8? > ? 0.0? ? 0.0? 0.0? 0.0? ? > 0.0???16.0???0???1 > c1t0d0 > >???401.7? ? 0.0? ? > 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 31.5? ? > 0.0???78.5???1 100 c1t1d0 > >???421.2? ? 0.0? ? > 2.0? ? 0.0? 0.0 30.4? ? > 0.0???72.3???1? 98 > c1t2d0 > >???403.9? ? 0.0? ? > 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 32.0? ? > 0.0???79.2???1 100 c1t3d0 > >???406.7? ? 0.0? ? > 2.0? ? 0.0? 0.0 33.0? ? > 0.0???81.3???1 100 c1t4d0 > >???414.2? ? 0.0? ? &g...

...9;d decided to break the mirror of the root disks for some very strange reason). It still shows: raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 replacing UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas c1t1d0s0/o OFFLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open So I am pretty sure it''ll hang again sometime soon. What is interesting though is that this is on x4500-02, and all our previous troubles mailed to the list was regarding our first x4500....

...0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c0t0d0 4898.3 34.2 23.2 1.4 0.1 385.3 0.0 78.1 0 1246 c1 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 0 1 c1t0d0 401.7 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 31.5 0.0 78.5 1 100 c1t1d0 421.2 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 30.4 0.0 72.3 1 98 c1t2d0 403.9 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 32.0 0.0 79.2 1 100 c1t3d0 406.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 33.0 0.0 81.3 1 100 c1t4d0 414.2 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 69.1 1 98 c1t5d0 406.3 0.0 1.8 0....

...fig: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0...